Re: The Way of the KOOK Was: Looking like wwIII
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.machines.cnc only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: The Way of the KOOK Was: Looking like wwIII         

Group: alt.machines.cnc · Group Profile
Author: BottleBob
Date: Sep 30, 2006 11:23

Cliff wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:25:57 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Cliff wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:36:44 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have NO interest into getting into a long dawn out political
>>>>discussion.
>>>
>>> You started it.
>>
>>Cliff:
>>
>> *I* STARTED a political discussion?
>>
>> Nope.
>
> Looked like it to me .

Cliff:

Well, I'm sorry to say you were wrong once again.
>
>> This, yet again, illustrates one of the major differences
>>between us.
>>I make/change my opinions/conclusions/hypotheses to accommodate new
>>facts/evidence.
>
> IOW You had stated things that were wrong in the first place ... .

Nope.

But if new facts/evidence contradict old facts/evidence, then I'm
certainly willing to change my opinion/conclusions. That's the very
spirit of using the scientific method, to continually seek a closer
approximation of the truth.
>> Here are the facts in THIS case. My first post to this thread
>>was
>>where I changed the title from "Looking like wwIII" to "The Way of the
>>KOOK". And removed all the crossposted groups.
>> In that post I listed some of the comments that exited at "The Way of
>>the KOOK" website. There was nothing at all political about it. It was
>>just general statements about KOOK type behavior.
>> Sitting Duck then made the comment: "Sounds like our current
>>government." It THEN became political after his comment.
>
> The first mention of "political" seems to have been your
> "It's positive FORESIGHT that seems to be lacking in the political
> arena of BOTH parties, in my opinion of course. -- BottleBob "

You silly wabbit, that post was something like the *seventh* post after
Sitting Duck diverted the sub-thread into the political arena. Just
read the progression of posts.
You're really reaching if you're trying to imply that the word
"political" has to be mentioned for the conversation to be considered
political? LMAO!

The bottom line is that you were wrong when you claimed this particular
thread drift into the political area was started by ME. Let's see if
you have the honesty and integrity to admit your error.
>
> BTW, Why don't you mark your threads as "OT" & make BD happy?

BTW, Why don't YOU stop crossposting your partisan political views all
over usenet & make virtually everyone in a.m.cnc happy, eh?

45 Comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: "Philthy" Phil Allison up for net-kook award! Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007aus.electronics ·