On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:34:40 -0700, jon_banquer
yahoo.com> wrote:

Your biased opinions are not truth Jon. Your version of the truth is
often just your beginner clueless banquer rants, where you seem to
post every time your brain farts.

Tom

On Sep 9, 12:19 pm, brewe...@aol.com wrote:

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with
or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now
that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:08:40 -0700, jon_banquer
yahoo.com> wrote:

Kudos Jon, you finally learned how to properly quote.

How many years did it take you to learn?
Have to brake down and buy a video tutorial did ya?

Could have trained a retard in less time..........but comparing you to
a retard is giving retards the world over a bad name.

Tom

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:08:40 -0700, jon_banquer
yahoo.com> wrote:

Your version of stuttering Jon?

No original content to add or anyone to plagiarize eh?

Tom

Tom Brewer is a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is someone who
knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely
everything about nothing.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2007/07/spend-a-littleo.html#comment-76366100

jon_banquer yahoo.com> wrote:

How can that be Jon? I never said anything about "real price paid in
the market".

Care to explain?

Guess the real question is why YOU need to make false accusations?

Tom

Tom Brewer And Joe788 "Logic" Examined:

You purchase a new computer.

You post it's a fast wonderful computer that does a great job for the
software you're running at the time!

Three years go by.

You post the computer you purchased three years ago is slow and will
no longer do the job and that this computer now sucks at running your
cadcam software. You also post that you have moved on to a new
computer made by someone else and it's great!

Tom Brewer / Joe788 use these postings to try and make the case that
the person posting is an idiot.

It's not hard to see who the ignorant idiot's are.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2007/07/spend-a-littleo.html#comment-76366100

Tom Brewer:

So ignorant he can't even read the cover of the SolidWorks Bible which
says:

" Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Guess we can add this to the list of how fucking ignorant you truly
are Tommy Girl.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2007/07/spend-a-littleo.html#comment-76366100

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0470080132/ref=cm_cr_dp_synop/105...#R3DYGL928EQQIF

"As a Mechanical Engineer, MSME that's been out of college for ten
years, I find that I turn to reference books at least on a monthly
basis."

"In general, there is a lot of information in this book, but I find if
very difficulty to read, follow and understand."

"Sometimes, the most intelligent people have the hardest time
explaining and simplifying ideas and topics. The book is written for
the strong intermediate to advance user. The book does cover very
well; 3D Sketching and surface-modeling functions: Swept, Fill,
Freeform, Offset, Knit, Radiate, etc."

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2007/07/spend-a-littleo.html#comment-76366100

Jon,

As I pointed out earlier and numerous times that you have our
positions reversed. Nice try at revising your history but it's here
for all to see.

You take the position Jon from your pervious posts that SW-1998 you
liked, then after years of development, improvements and enhancements
you say SW-2006 is a "Complete Piece Of Shit".

Exhibit A:

"For the record I like SolidWorks" Jon Banquer April 10, 1998

Exhibit B:

"Without a doubt SaladWorks is a complete piece of shit" - Jon
Banquer - May 21, 2006

-------------------------

So please tell us what made SW-1998 good and SW-2006 such a piece of
shit?

-----------------------
Remember this?