|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Gunner AschGunner Asch Date: Oct 15, 2007 21:53
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:44:24 +0200, Monika Krug
wrote:
>Gunner schrieb:
>
>> Current proven oil fields are running out. Hardly all the oil on the
>> planet.
>>
>> There are untold numbers of unproven reserves.
>
>Now think about why those oil fields have not been found yet. Because
>they are so far underground, in difficult areas, in porous stone and so
>on. It will be really really difficult and expensive to get it out of
>there.
Actually...not true for the most part. Yes, some are in remote places
indeed. However thats not been an issue...look at the North Slope
The oil companies have developed recovery technologies that have made
getting oil out of the ground possible in fields that 30 yrs ago were
impossible. Not to mention reworking existing oil fields.
|
| Show full article (2.91Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Gunner AschGunner Asch Date: Oct 15, 2007 21:54
>Monika Krug wrote:
>> Gunner schrieb:
>>
>>> Current proven oil fields are running out. Hardly all the oil on the
>>> planet.
>>>
>>> There are untold numbers of unproven reserves.
>>
>> Now think about...
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des angesmariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges Date: Oct 15, 2007 22:10
In article 4ax.com>,
Gunner Asch NOSPAM.earthlink.net> wrote:
>>Now think about why those oil fields have not been found yet. Because
>>they are so far underground, in difficult areas, in porous stone and so
>>on. It will be really really difficult and expensive to get it out of
>>there.
> Each time the price of oil has gone up enough to warrant further
> exploration, they do. When there is no reasonable profit margin, they
> hold off. Currently we are experienceing a small boom in oil
> exploration here in California, as well as around the planet.
alright
exponentially increasing prices will have no effect on the overall economy
> Spending money on research is hardy a negative to any economy if its
> done by the private sector.
try to find any modern technology without some government funded research
arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconsciousness of odd bodkins
sacramento - political pigsty of the western world
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des angesmariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges Date: Oct 15, 2007 22:19
In article 4ax.com>,
Gunner Asch NOSPAM.earthlink.net> wrote:
> Do you hold the same negative feelings about information from an
> environmentalist group?
what are they selling? what are the researchers shilling?
> A quick Google brings up a myrid number of hits
in the real world how many successful wells?
arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconsciousness of odd bodkins
sacramento - political pigsty of the western world
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Monika KrugMonika Krug Date: Oct 16, 2007 07:16
Gunner Asch schrieb:
> Now if you have reason to believe that the writers are bought and paid
> for by British Petroluem now is the time to present the data.
The reason to believe this is that ad in the top right corner I mentioned.
Monika.
--
Chuck Norris knows location AND speed of that particle.
E-mail address is valid until 4 weeks after the expiration date. Use
@arcor.de instead.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: §ñühw¤£f§ñühw¤£f Date: Oct 16, 2007 07:18
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:54:37 -0400
Dogma Talk-n-Dog..com> wasted precious bandwith with:
> §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:17:58 -0400
>> Dogma Talk-n-Dog..com> wasted precious bandwith with:
>> >>> finite is a good thing, the sooner the better. I'm going to buy
>>> two SUV's.
>>
>> Read Ed Abbey's Monkey Wrench Gang and you'll get the feeling
>> that you're not the first to have thought of that.
>>
>
> Great, we have a CONSENSUS...
Get a pie chart to illustrate your claims.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kirk GordonKirk Gordon Date: Oct 16, 2007 17:33
Window Licking wrote:
> Monika Krug wrote:
>
>> Gunner schrieb:
>>
>>> Current proven oil fields are running out. Hardly all the oil on the
>>> planet.
>>>
>>> There are untold numbers of unproven reserves.
>>
>>
>> Now think about why those oil fields have not been found yet. Because
>> they are so far underground, in difficult areas, in porous stone and
>> so on. It will be really really difficult and expensive to get it out
>> of there.
>>
>> Now who's destroying the US economy? Those people that say: Reduce
>> energy and fuel usage and invest now into wind, water, solar, tidal
>> and geothermic energy? Or those people that say: Let's go and live on
>> as we always did and as if there were no tomorrow? ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kirk GordonKirk Gordon Date: Oct 16, 2007 17:41
Aratzio wrote:
>
> So how does any conservative get behind a fuckknob like Shrub, failed
> business man, spoilt rich boy and support his kind of profligate
> spending?
By realizing that "conservative" doesn't have to mean stupid, or
republican, or "I only got two choices and they both sucked."
Right now, about half of the adult population of the US is running
for president in 2008. The states are fighting about when to hold
primaries. The parties are arguing about whether they even want to pay
attention to some of the primaries. There are big name, big budget
candidates. Little names and little budgets, too. And everything in
between. And still time, maybe, for more and better to get into the fray.
NOW is the time to start casting your ballots, your dollars, your
blog-notes, and everything else you can think of. At this point in the
process, the voters and contributors can actually make a difference.
But if you wait till November of next year, and then look around to see
what the choices are, you'll get screwed again, just like last time.
KG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Kirk GordonKirk Gordon Date: Oct 16, 2007 17:49
Aratzio wrote:
>
> *BOGGLE*
> Not unless we use the laser drill from Lost In Space. (I know it won't
> work, gases...)
>
> First, the hole drilled is too small to be of use in transfer of
> geothermal energy. So you need to drill a lot of them.
>
> Second, the cost of drilling to depths that allow for transfer of
> geothermal can only be born by governments with years to drill, each
> hole.
>
> I am sure there about 30 other reasons why that is a pipe dream.
Dude! (Or dudette, maybe. The name doesn't give me much of a clue.)
|
| Show full article (1.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
