Gunner Asch wrote:

And what price did your eggs bring at market, sir?

ah wrote:

Aratzio wrote:

[
If you’re a complete idiot like Usenet’s Tom Brewer and think a
roll back bar in a history based CAD modeler is a good enough tool and
that the manufacturing world needs more “experts” like Matt Lombard


]-Jon_Banquer http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/

Jon,

Please post one instance where I ever said anything along the lines of
"a roll back bar in a history based CAD modeler is a good enough
tool".

I have corrected you a number of times but you still continue to lie
claiming I said a roll back bar is all that is needed or a roll back
bar is good enough. I never said it.

All I said was that you were a beginner (and you were) having beginner
problems and you should post specifics about your issues where more
experienced users could come forward and help you.

Of course you never did just like you never posted;

http://militarybodyarmor.blogspot.com/ - Watch the full length video
of the video that might prevent obama presidency. Sexual Relations
with Obamas Aides located includes " Audio Files " and full gallery.?

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:07:14 -0800 (PST), barn_rubble@excite.com
wrote:

Barn,

I must admit I was a little disturbed when you raised the bar with
your elf dancing video. However I feel much better now after my recent
visit to Jon's blob.

I was on the Jon-the-Donk-Bandqueer's blog running up his impossible
to run up counter when I noticed I am mentioned in the same paragraph
as Matt Lombard. I am honored to be mentioned on the DONKERS HOME PAGE
on the same page, in the same paragraph, same sentence with a
SolidWorks Expert and Author of the SolidWorks Bible's.

You can lose... or you can read the Jon Banquer blog. ;>)

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

As many of us are aware, even though insufficient numbers of the
bond holders refused to exchange their secured debt
[collateralized bonds] for equity [stock] in GMAC, especially
those with other peoples money at risk such as PIMCO [Bill Gross]
(and no offsetting or overriding interest in GM and/or Cerberus)
and thus meet the *MINIMUM* capital:debt ratio requirements, the
Federal Reserve citing “unusual and exigent circumstances
affecting the financial markets,” approved GMAC as a one bank
holding company. [The FDIC insured GMAC bank].

ASAIK none of the media has called for wage/benefit cuts for the
GMAC workers or salary/bonus caps for the executives.

It appears that if you wear Big Smith or Red Cap clothes and
steel toed shoes [even Red Wings] at work you make too much
money, while if your wear Prada or Armani clothes and Gucci
shoes, the problem was you weren't paid enough.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRlALpvxQyZo&refer=home
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2008/200812/20081215/article_384496.htm

Note that GMAC is jointly owned by GM and Cerberus, and now has
acceses to the FRB's "magic money machine."

BottleBob wrote:

It works ok but does anyone make them with a left-hand thread?
RR

clutch@lycos.com wrote:

Do you remember the old TV show "Combat"?
I was just a kid but recognized the "bandages" they pulled out of their
kits.
RR