The deaf, dumb, and blind biofuel cultists have yet another heavy
issue to explain away!

A new study says corn ethanol biofuel production will cause a 10 to 34
percent increase in nitrogen pollution in the Mississippi and
Atchafalaya Rivers due to fertilizer run-off, thus increasing the size
of the "DEAD ZONE" in the Gulf of Mexico.

SEE news story at - http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jU6qItzJ1GYKP8nH0U2vO6ggZlag

STUDY ABSTRACT at - http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0708300105v1

"Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen
export by the Mississippi River"
Simon D. Donner*, and Christopher - Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS)

SEE 10 good reasons to oppose biofuels - http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html
- You will find a warehouse of facts and links here!

Christopher Calder

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT), "calderhome@yahoo.com"
yahoo.com> mumbled:

You are crazy and working for OPEC---but we KNEW that!

"Owl Cafe & Filling Station" wrote...

I take it you failed to read the article and look at the references.

Nothing short of 100%% biofuel will do anything to alter the oil / fuel crisis.

"The moment war is declared... the mass of the people, through
some spiritual alchemy, become convinced that they have willed
and executed the deed themselves. They then, with the exception
of a few malcontents, proceed to allow themselves to be regimented,
coerced, deranged in all the environments of their lives, and turned
into a solid manufactory of destruction toward whatever other people
may have, in the appointed scheme of things, come within the range
of the Government's disapprobation...
-- Randolph Bourne, "The State", 1918

"calderhome@yahoo.com" yahoo.com> wrote:

He ain't heavy Father. He's my Biofuel!

"David Morgan \(MAMS\)" m-a-m-s.comC/Odm> wrote:

Genome Man building critters to eat CO2 and shit High Test. Don' worry. Be
happy in your work.

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:20:09 GMT, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
m-a-m-s.comC/Odm> mumbled:

Wrong - a combination of several biofuels AND increased conservation
from highe mileage vehicles will do plenty.

On Mar 11, 12:43 am, "calderh...@yahoo.com" yahoo.com>
wrote:

Farmers downstream won't have to buy fertilizer. It's a win-win.

On Mar 11, 7:15 am, Owl Cafe & Filling Station wrote:

-----------------------
All of the biofuel schemes are dead ends, and that includes algae.
They all take way too much land and they all do way too much
environmental damage.

We have two choices.

1) Develop and use oil from American shale and hope the global
warming predictions are wrong.

OR

2) Use nuclear energy to produce either hydrogen gas or synthetic
fuels made from CO2 sucked right out of the atmosphere. Those are the
two choices, as solar, wind, tidal, etc., will never provide more than
20%% of our energy demands.

see: http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html

CC

"Lobby Dosser" verizon.net> offered in message...

"Hi-Test" as you say, along with other petroleum based fuels, are what need
to be eliminated. Were it not for the oil barons, the entire planet would be
running some 80%% on alternative energy sources by now. Money by way
of corporate profits from the rapage of American's pocketbooks, has now
purchased the corrupt US government while complacent people sleep.

Who killed the electric car? George W. Bush and Dick Cheney - oil crooks.

"My fellow Americans, major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the
battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed."
--George W. Bush, May 1, 2003

"Owl Cafe & Filling Station" wrote in message news:febdt3t1coh6jb4iu06k7tn7c7p3u952hf@4ax.com...