Re: Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.history.future only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?         

Group: alt.history.future · Group Profile
Author: Robert
Date: Oct 4, 2007 20:10

who is katherine trimble????????????????
"Dan Goodman" iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:455001a9$0$15014$8046368a@newsreader.iphouse.net...
> You have the wrong newsgroup. This is not
> alt.bullshit.paranoid.rambling
>
>
> envyverminsareevil@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?
>>
>> A person, mistakenly think that she's in his friend list. However,
>> rather than denying it, she'll simply give a friendly reply.
>>
>>> Hi [My Friends' name]
>>>
>>> Many thanks for your message.
>>>
>>> Remind me what *** is again?
>>>
>>> There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Katherine
>>
>> Such mutual communication automatically make each person in the friend
>> list of another in a social networking site.
>>
>> Not suspicious of any problem, the person then build his business
>> network in a friendly manner to many of those in his list, which
>> unfortunately include the old hag.
>>
>> Soon, the beldam is engaged in serious slandering campaign the person.
>> She claimed that never communicated at all with the person, which is
>> false. She claimed that the person is spamming, the claim that does
>> not match the official rule. She also claimed that the person is
>> pretending to be her friend to get her friends.
>>
>> The accusation is absurd. Who the hell does she think she is that
>> anyone would pretend to be her friend? What makes her so arrogant?
>>
>> What sort of idiot cannot tell a different between someone trying to
>> be friendly to many people and someone trying to fraudulently get
>> extra credibility by pretending to be someone's friend?
>>
>> Thinking this is just a friendly misunderstanding, the person simply
>> explained to Katherine:
>>
>>> I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep
>>> in mind that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>>> each other network, which you can check, before saying anything
>>> about me. Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>>> something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>>> I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have
>>> understood and tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have
>>> really been friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to
>>> concentrate on.
>>
>> The beldam didn't stop. She got even madder.
>>
>> She kept making many false claims. She claimed that the person is a
>> robot with no public information. She said that she had never
>> communicated in any way to the person. She tried to portray that the
>> person has some fraudulent intent, friendless, and that nobody trust
>> the person. She claimed that the person is a nazi.
>>
>> All these are over a few friendly gestures to her friends.
>>
>> Now, put your self in the persons' shoe. What can he do to make her
>> leave him alone?
>>
>> Expert analysis suggests racism as her real motives. The person is
>> Asian and Katherine is white.
>>
>> She kept doing so after being told about the fallacy of the claim.
>> It's not until the truth is published that her tone start changing.
>> Then she raised totally different issues.
>>
>> That didn't left not many amicable options to deal with this kind.
>>
>> Guess she knew all along that the claim were false. She just didn't
>> expect anyone would publish the contrary. She's a time bomb. She had
>> gone the extra miles condemning a person for a few slight friendly
>> gesture, we'll never know what she'll do to anyone.
>>
>> It seems that her other much related real motive is best explained by
>> her very own words:
>>
>> "I do not like the way you ramp up your connections"
>>
>> It's quite unfortunate that the world is filled with envy vermins that
>> just get this thing against those more successful than them.
>>
>> The truth is they're simply uncompetitive. Hence, they craft lies and
>> prejudices against those who are. That's why we have so many nonsenses
>> justifying prohibition against so many consensual acts.
>>
>> Some have reasonable cases. Most can be appeased. But some, like the
>> beldam, should get the fuck out of the gene pool for good along with
>> all her kind for the sake of prosperity for all before they form
>> another Nazi party.
>>
>> It's very stupid trying to reason to such bigots for the same reason
>> we don't reason or negotiate with mosquitoes and germs. We just get
>> rid them.
>>
>> More effortlessly we should set one of the vermin as a sample to show
>> the rest their proper place. They hit, we hit harder; Those maggots
>> don't deserver higher level of communication.
>>
>> Currently our world is filled with unfair misery given to those who
>> are honestly successful. The mere acts of making honest money are
>> punishable by tax. Getting many chicks is also condemned. Yet, we have
>> to lock our doors in fear that someone will steal our properties
>> because governments protect thieves.
>>
>> Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success will
>> then simply be a bridge to gas chamber.
>>
>> Even if we let the worthless die and kill parasites, the market will
>> take care of everything anyway. Believing otherwise is practicing envy
>> bigotry.
>>
>> Yet, capitalists, out of benevolence have given more and more to those
>> who oppress them. Only capitalists patiently give the other cheek and
>> repay hatred and genocide with aids and helps often to ungrateful
>> angry mobs.
>>
>> When vermins like Katherine keeps being influential, it should be
>> about time all of us to stop playing nice. Keep doing otherwise means
>> having to realize that it's really fear and not benevolent or mercy
>> that motivate us.
>>
>> Long live freedom, competition, rationality, meritocracy, prosperity,
>> and proper alignment between individuals' interests to productivity as
>> a whole. The world will be a better place if all of her kind went
>> extinct.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Goodman
> All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
> John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.
> Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
> Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood
> Political http://www.dailykos.com/user/dsgood
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!