|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Doug WellerDoug Weller Date: Jan 14, 2008 00:46
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:28:42 -0500, in sci.archaeology, Cory Albrecht
wrote:
>Lars Wilson wrote, on 2008/01/13 13:59:
>>> Lars Wilson wrote, on 2008/01/11 04:57:
>>>
>>> Ah... because it was in the Bible it gets a free pass on verifiability by
>>> actual evidence?
>>>
>> No. Archaeologists, because of their prejudice are non-objective as far as
>> Biblical chronological reference. They are smart archaeologists but
>> inefficient to incompetent chronologists. THAT is part of the problem.
>... huge snippage ...
>
>So, Lars, I'm wondering why you posted this screed three separate times
>to three separate newsgroups? Not only that, but it's an exact repeat of
>your threaded reply to my reply to you in alt.history.sci.archaeology.
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: Lars WilsonLars Wilson Date: Jan 14, 2008 07:48
"Doug Weller" ramtops.removethis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ea8mo3hndp5f37rdsl923rvuolaic6172t@4ax.com...> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:28:42 -0500, in sci.archaeology, Cory Albrecht
> wrote:
>
>>Lars Wilson wrote, on 2008/01/13 13:59:
>>>> Lars Wilson wrote, on 2008/01/11 04:57:
>>>>
>>>> Ah... because it was in the Bible it gets a free pass on verifiability
>>>> by
>>>> actual evidence?
>>>>
>>> No. Archaeologists, because of their prejudice are non-objective as far
>>> as
>>> Biblical chronological reference. They are smart archaeologists but
>>> inefficient to incompetent chronologists. THAT is part of the problem.
>>... huge snippage ...
>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Doug WellerDoug Weller Date: Jan 14, 2008 08:27
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:48:50 -0600, in sci.archaeology, Lars Wilson wrote:
>
>"Doug Weller" ramtops.removethis.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:ea8mo3hndp5f37rdsl923rvuolaic6172t@4ax.com...>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:28:42 -0500, in sci.archaeology, Cory Albrecht
>> wrote...
|
| Show full article (2.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Lars WilsonLars Wilson Date: Jan 18, 2008 05:20
"Doug Weller" ramtops.removethis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:71too3lm3cim5gh91av937v3nj2dh34eh0@4ax.com...> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:44:40 -0600, in sci.archaeology, Lars Wilson wrote:
>>
> Legend. Not fact. Or rather story, not fact.
>
We're not talking about facts, we're talking about HISTORY. But even if
this is a legend, everybody knows part of the legend isn't that he wasn't
born yet when he was consulted. The legend represents him as an adult at
least. That's the issue.
But I can see where this is going.
You know sometimes you can have the perfect tapestry for a cold, blank wall.
But if there are no hooks in that wall, you still can't hang it. I learned
that from years of debating.
:>
|
| Show full article (1.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: joerevskeltonjoerevskelton Date: Jan 18, 2008 12:44
"Lars Wilson" embarqmail.com> wrote in message
news:IKGdnfwyCvs6Og3anZ2dnUVZ_ramnZ2d@giganews.com...>
> "Doug Weller" ramtops.removethis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:71too3lm3cim5gh91av937v3nj2dh34eh0@4ax.com...>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:44:40 -0600, in sci.archaeology, Lars Wilson
>> wrote:
>>>
>> Legend. Not fact. Or rather story, not fact.
>>
> We're not talking about facts, we're talking about HISTORY.
And history is made up of facts; not legands.
None of which is really relevant to sci.archaeology.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
