|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Epi-SodeEpi-Sode Date: Feb 18, 2008 02:38
It's a quiet weekend - not many interesting posts in the last 48 hours,
so I thought I would liven things up a bit ...
I sense that theists demand of atheists that the athiests should prove
the non-existence of God by positive means rather than accepting the
demand by atheists that theists should prove the existence of God by the
same means. (Anybody who has ever tried it will realise that trying to
prove that something exists, when you have the evidence, is far easier
than trying to prove the alternative, or non-existence of something.)
So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
(Oh, if you want a scientific analogy, I will happily offer one: "Who
among you can demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that the Higgs boson
exists?". The answer (at least for the moment) is that no-one can.)
Have a great tirade!
|
| |
|
| | 132 Comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Feb 18, 2008 04:36
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:38:08 +0900, Epi-Sode excite.com> wrote:
>So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
>beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
Big bang.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
|
| |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: ZadokZadok Date: Feb 18, 2008 04:50
"Epi-Sode" <> wrote in message ...
> It's a quiet weekend - not many interesting posts in the last 48 hours,
> so I thought I would liven things up a bit ...
>
> I sense that theists demand of atheists that the athiests should prove
> the non-existence of God by positive means rather than accepting the
> demand by atheists that theists should prove the existence of God by the
> same means. (Anybody who has ever tried it will realise that trying to
> prove that something exists, when you have the evidence, is far easier
> than trying to prove the alternative, or non-existence of something.)
>
> So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
> beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
Religionists will avoid your post. As they have no evidence of anything.
If you were to do a quick look at the Argument from a negative theory,
you would quickly realize that asking for proof that something does not
exist
is nothing but a religionist ploy, so that they can avoid having to answer
that they have no evidence.
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: dukeduke Date: Feb 18, 2008 12:00
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:50:58 GMT, "Zadok" wrote:
>
>"Epi-Sode" <> wrote in message ...
>> It's a quiet weekend - not many interesting posts in the last 48 hours,
>> so I thought I would liven things up a bit ...
>>
>> I sense that theists demand of atheists...
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHimSheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Date: Feb 18, 2008 14:56
"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
news:nsuir3h972qt27m7jlkiib515pf5eo1hck@4ax.com...> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:38:08 +0900, Epi-Sode excite.com> wrote:
>>>So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
>>beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
>
> Big bang.
so what? your sky pixie went POOF
who created your sky pixie ?
> duke, brainwashed christian moron
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHimSheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Date: Feb 18, 2008 14:57
> And the Duck, answers Big Bang. The only Big Bang the Duck has ever heard
> was his mind slamming shut to avoid having to think.
LMAO, good one
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHimSheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim Date: Feb 18, 2008 14:59
> But it took the supreme creator to create the universe and all in it.
who created the supreme creator? the mega supreme creator?
who created the mega supreme creator ?
>
> Chuckles, z. I know this is still all over your head.
I know my comments are WAY over your head duke, you still believe the
HORSESHIT RAMBLINGS of superstitious cave dwellers and goat fuckers
> duke, brainwashed christian nutcase
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BIll MBIll M Date: Feb 18, 2008 11:37
"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
news:dsojr3p4k3bdr3iu507de1nbfh92rvrjr1@4ax.com...> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:50:58 GMT, "Zadok" wrote:
>
>>
>>"Epi-Sode" <> wrote in message ...
>>> It's a quiet weekend - not many interesting posts in the last 48 hours,
>>> so I thought I would liven things up a bit ...
>>>
>>> I sense that theists demand of atheists that the athiests should prove
>>> the non-existence of God by positive means rather than accepting the
>>> demand by atheists that theists should prove the existence of God by the
>>> same means. (Anybody who has ever tried it will realise that trying to
>>> prove that something exists, when you have the evidence, is far easier
>>> than trying to prove the alternative, or non-existence of something.)
>>>
>>> So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
>>> beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
>>
>>Religionists will avoid your post. As they have no evidence of anything. ...
|
| Show full article (1.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John SmithJohn Smith Date: Feb 18, 2008 18:05
"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
news:dsojr3p4k3bdr3iu507de1nbfh92rvrjr1@4ax.com...> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:50:58 GMT, "Zadok" wrote:
>
>>
>>"Epi-Sode" <> wrote in message ...
>>> It's a quiet weekend - not many interesting posts in the last 48 hours,
>>> so I thought I would liven things up a bit ...
>>>
>>> I sense that theists demand of atheists that the athiests should prove
>>> the non-existence of God by positive means rather than accepting the
>>> demand by atheists that theists should prove the existence of God by the
>>> same means. (Anybody who has ever tried it will realise that trying to
>>> prove that something exists, when you have the evidence, is far easier
>>> than trying to prove the alternative, or non-existence of something.)
>>>
>>> So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
>>> beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
>>
>>Religionists will avoid your post. As they have no evidence of anything. ...
|
| Show full article (1.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: MaryMary Date: Feb 18, 2008 23:49
"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
news:nsuir3h972qt27m7jlkiib515pf5eo1hck@4ax.com...> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:38:08 +0900, Epi-Sode excite.com> wrote:
>>>So I am happy to throw down the gauntlet: "Who among you can demonstrate
>>beyond reasonable doubt that God exists?"
>
> Big bang.
>
LOL. You think the big bang is evidence for your invisible sky pixie who
sits above the clouds watching as a bus load of children crash, doing
nothing to prevent it whilst loving them all the time? Moron.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
