>>
>> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being thousands
>> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible, which
>> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>>
> Not a lie. I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
> in the
> attic to find sources for you.
Google is your friend. Your excuse is lame. When I googled, I found
NOTHING remotely similar to your claim.
Indeed, rather than 5,000 complete manuscripts that predate 200 AD, there
seem to be none. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
There is no truth whatsoeve in your memory, not even something that could
be twisted into resembling truth.
If you want to rely on memory, go ahead. But ISTM that you have trouble
distinguishing your memory from your desires.
I noted that I wasn't quoting from
> reference
> source but from memory.
What you said was that "I know it to be true".
>>
>> You have plenty of time to post your whacky theories about cosmology, and
>> to tell long, rambling lies about some unnamed guy who (you assured us)
>> KNOWS THE TRUTH that stars were never born.
>>
> Sticks and stones will break my bones
> but words will never hurt me.
Of course. You likely have been called on your lies and bullshit for many
years, and have become immune to any sense of shame.
You seemingly have discovered that flowery language and an appearance of
certainty is enough to bamboozle the unsophisticated, and you care
fuck-all about any other consequences of lying.
> You sure have a propensity for calling people liars. Why is that?
Bullshit. I call you a liar. I have no such propensity. What do you
base your charge upon? One example?
This conclusion of yours is further evidence that you are full of shit,
andthat nothing you say, NOTHING, is to be believed without confirmation.
Got any evidence that I have such a propensity? Or is it just wishful
thinking informing you that such a conclusion is justified?
>>
>> You have plenty of timeto post an apologetic explanation of why you
>> believe (it is irrelevant that you fell flat on your face).
>>
> Apologetics, look it up in a dictionary. And no, I didn't and don't
> have
> the time to give what it would take.
You run away when confronted. That is the mark of a coward. A lying
coward.
Explain yourself, or lots of readers will realize that you are fullof
shit, and that nothing you say should be believed without careful
verification.
>>
>> But when asked about your lies, you go into hiding. Â You make excuses. You
>> try to pretend that you are still someone whose word is to be trusted,
>> but that you are SO IMPORTANT and busy that you can't be bothered to
>> explain yourself.
>>
>> Everybody now knows that you tell blatent lies, and that nothing you say
>> can be trusted. Â You will have to deal with this situation, or forever be
>> a laughing stock. Going into hiding isn't going to work.
>>
>> Â And I don't have it tonight either. Â I've got five
>>
> I wonder how old you are.
50
You write like an immature 20 year old.
> Why are
> you so bitter and hard hearted?
I don't suffer fools gladly. Especially pompous, lying fools who try to
bamboozle the unsophisticated.
> Truth be told, you can be the world's greatest theologian and know
> every
> answer to every question, but that would be no proof that you knew the
> Truth.
Irrelevant. Beside the point. Not a defense for your lies.
And because it is all too easy to discern your nature, I'm
> sure you
> will try to elevate yourself (a delusion) by verbally attacking your
> quarry
> to belittle them. Standard grade school play ground tactics.
> Hint Hint. No one cares on the internet.
Clue: Fewer folks will believe your lies again, unless you explain
yourself.
-- The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always
so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
