|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: EskWIREDEskWIRED Date: Jul 14, 2008 14:05
Hey bub - you got some 'splaining to do.
You were asked a bunch of questions about your seemingly dishonest
postings. Did you hide under your covers and hope that everyone would
forget?
Clue: You will either have to explain yourself, or it will be assumed
that you knowingly told some tall tales, and used the decalogue as toilet
paper.
Is your pride so important that you cannot admit an error?
Is your Faith so weak that you must rely upon untruths to justify it?
Is your ego so fragile that you cannot face the situation?
There's souls out there that need saving! We need you to come clean!
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel
|
| |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
|
Author: lsenderslsenders Date: Jul 14, 2008 14:10
> Hey bub - Â you got some 'splaining to do.
>
> You were asked a bunch of questions about your seemingly dishonest
> postings. Â Did you hide under your covers and hope that everyone would
> forget? Â
>
> Clue: Â You will either have to explain yourself, or it will be assumed
> that you knowingly told some tall tales, and used the decalogue as toilet
> paper.
>
> Is your pride so important that you cannot admit an error?
>
> Is your Faith so weak that you must rely upon untruths to justify it?
>
> Is your ego so fragile that you cannot face the situation?
>
> There's souls out there that need saving! We need you to come clean!
>
Not at all. Unlike some people, I actually have a life outside of the ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: EskWIREDEskWIRED Date: Jul 15, 2008 06:08
>> Hey bub - Â you got some 'splaining to do.
>>
>> You were asked a bunch of questions about your seemingly dishonest
>> postings. Â Did you hide under your covers and hope that everyone would
>> forget? Â
>>
>> Clue: Â You will either have to explain yourself, or it will be assumed
>> that you knowingly told some tall tales, and used the decalogue as toilet
>> paper.
>>
>> Is your pride so important that you cannot admit an error?
>>
>> Is your Faith so weak that you must rely upon untruths to justify it?
>>
>> Is your ego so fragile that you cannot face the situation?
>>
>> There's souls out there that need saving! We need you to come clean!
>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.41Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: lsenderslsenders Date: Jul 15, 2008 14:43
>
> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being thousands
> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible, which
> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>
Not a lie. I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
in the
attic to find sources for you. I noted that I wasn't quoting from
reference
source but from memory.
>
> You have plenty of time to post your whacky theories about cosmology, and
> to tell long, rambling lies about some unnamed guy who (you assured us)
> KNOWS THE TRUTH that stars were never born.
>
Sticks and stones will break my bones
but words will never hurt me.
You sure have a propensity for calling people liars. Why is that?
>
> You have plenty of timeto post an apologetic explanation of why you
> believe (it is irrelevant that you fell flat on your face)....
|
| Show full article (2.04Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: EskWIREDEskWIRED Date: Jul 15, 2008 15:13
>>
>> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being thousands
>> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible, which
>> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>>
> Not a lie. I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
> in the
> attic to find sources for you.
Google is your friend. Your excuse is lame. When I googled, I found
NOTHING remotely similar to your claim.
Indeed, rather than 5,000 complete manuscripts that predate 200 AD, there
seem to be none. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
There is no truth whatsoeve in your memory, not even something that could
be twisted into resembling truth.
If you want to rely on memory, go ahead. But ISTM that you have trouble
distinguishing your memory from your desires.
|
| Show full article (4.11Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: lsenderslsenders Date: Jul 16, 2008 14:48
> In alt.religion.christian lsend...@ hotmail.com wrote: >
>>> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being thousands
>>> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible, which
>>> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>
>> Not a lie. Â I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
>> in the
>> attic to find sources for you.
>
> Google is your friend. Â Your excuse is lame. Â When I googled, I found
> NOTHING remotely similar to your claim.
>
I posted off of what I had studied and presented papers for in
school. Sure,
google is easy but that wasn't my reference. The research I did for
one of
my classes is all locked away. I thought is was in the attic in one ...
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: RalphRalph Date: Jul 16, 2008 16:03
>
> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being thousands
> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible, which
> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>
Not a lie. I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
in the
attic to find sources for you. I noted that I wasn't quoting from
reference
source but from memory.
Reply: If you find that reference in your notes you need to post it. I want
to know which theist idiot wrote that.
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: RalphRalph Date: Jul 16, 2008 18:04
> In alt.religion.christian lsend...@ hotmail.com wrote: >
>>> You had plenty of time to post your fantasies about there being
>>> thousands
>>> and thousands and thousands of comlete manuscripts of your bible,
>>> which
>>> was nothing but a baldfaced lie.
>
>> Not a lie. I just don't have the time to go through all my notes up
>> in the
>> attic to find sources for you.
>
> Google is your friend. Your excuse is lame. When I googled, I found
> NOTHING remotely similar to your claim.
>
I posted off of what I had studied and presented papers for in ...
|
| Show full article (2.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
