>
> On 22 Aug 2008 23:26:31 GMT, The Chief Instigator io.com>
> wrote:
>

>>On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:01:26 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote:

>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:07:00 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
>>> Kittrell) wrote:
>>>

>>>>> You're going down, asu. Can't come up with anything better than a simple word
>>>>> error that would not be picked up by a spell checker?

>>>

>>>>Demonstrating, in one neat and tidy package, that 1) I can think (as
>>>>you asked)

>>>
>>> No evidence for that one.
>>>

>>>> and 2) I'm smarter than the average spell checker, but you are not.

>>>
>>> The word was spelled correctly.
>>>

>>>>I like it.

>>>
>>> Gotcha.

>>
>>Congratulations, Earl Weber, for demonstrating that you're illiterate in
>>your first language. Baton Rouge is definitely not being deprived.

>
> Was it his "has" instead of "had"?
>
> That's an easy one to do because the s and d keys are next to each
> other.
>
> But yes, he is an illiterate.
>
> But it wasn't as bad as the grammar flames I've occasionally had when
> I've used the subjunctive.