OH MY GOD!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.god only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.god Profile…
 Up
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: duke
Date: Aug 17, 2008 15:57

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:46:39 -0700, John Locke comcast.net>
wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:05:20 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:18:17 +0100, "Bill M" bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Can anyone supply ANY OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE REPRODUCIBLE EVIDENCE that Any
>>>GOD exists except in the imaginations of men???
>>
>>God is not in the imaginations of men. The one and only living God is real.
>>
>I wasn't aware that "God" was alive. In that case, can you please
>supply DNA samples.

It's not at all surprising that you're not familiar with the term "living God".
I've constantly and consistently pointed out to you that no other god ever so
much as lifted a finger.
Show full article (0.82Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Enkidu
Date: Aug 17, 2008 16:15

duke cox.net> wrote in
news:6saha49rgldpe27cge940urjfhr1tuvjh3@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu
> (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
>
>>In article 4ax.com> duke
>>cox.net> writes:
>>> On...
Show full article (1.46Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Enkidu
Date: Aug 17, 2008 16:19

duke cox.net> wrote in
news:v1bha4pvn7ahp1jrr6p4rgl4qottff6mje@4ax.com:
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Enkidu
Date: Aug 17, 2008 16:39

duke cox.net> wrote in
news:54bha4h787jd0jpermg21btpthjt2ebujh@4ax.com:
>>I wasn't aware that "God" was alive. In that case, can you please
>>supply DNA samples.
>
> It's not at all surprising that you're not familiar with the term
> "living God". I've constantly and consistently pointed out to you that
> no other god ever so much as lifted a finger.

What's he done in, say, the last 2000 years? Anyone walk on water, turn
loaves into fish?

--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been
searching for evidence which could support this.
-- Bertrand Russell
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Free Lunch
Date: Aug 17, 2008 17:27

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:54:44 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism:
>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
>Kittrell) wrote:
>
>>In article 4ax.com> duke cox.net> writes:
>>> On Fri, 15...
Show full article (1.26Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Free Lunch
Date: Aug 17, 2008 17:30

On 17 Aug 2008 23:19:34 GMT, Enkidu trashmail.net> wrote in
alt.atheism:
>duke cox.net> wrote in
>news:v1bha4pvn7ahp1jrr6p4rgl4qottff6mje@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:37:34 -0700 (PDT), modematic
>> operamail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Aug 15, 4...
Show full article (1.20Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Free Lunch
Date: Aug 17, 2008 17:31

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:57:31 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote in
alt.atheism:
Show full article (0.94Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: erikc
Date: Aug 17, 2008 20:10

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:57:31 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:46:39 -0700, John Locke comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:05:20 -0500, duke cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:18:17 +0100, "Bill M" bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can anyone supply ANY OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE REPRODUCIBLE EVIDENCE that Any
>>>>GOD exists except in the imaginations of men???
>>>
>>>God is not in the imaginations of men. The one and only living God is real.
>>>
>>I wasn't aware that "God" was alive. In that case, can you please
>>supply DNA samples.
>
>It's not at all surprising that you're not familiar with the term "living God".
>I've constantly and consistently pointed out to you that no other god ever so
>much as lifted a finger.
Show full article (1.49Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Jack
Date: Aug 18, 2008 07:31

"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
news:draha4tggq3dskheeo0tr44vsjoaij77g9@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:07:49 -0400, "Jack" yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"duke" cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:errba4h170l19sts0ug73lt1tm9l41pti7@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:18:17 +0100, "Bill M" bellsouth.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can anyone supply ANY OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE REPRODUCIBLE EVIDENCE that
>>>>Any
>>>>GOD exists except in the imaginations of men???
>>>
>>> God is not in the imaginations of men. The one and only living God is
>>> real.
>>>
>>If imaginations aren't real then what are they?
>
> Simple - God is not an imagination. ...
Show full article (0.75Kb)
no comments
Re: OH MY GOD!         


Author: Cary Kittrell
Date: Aug 18, 2008 10:33

In article <6saha49rgldpe27cge940urjfhr1tuvjh3@4ax.com> duke cox.net> writes:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
> Kittrell) wrote:
>
>>In article 4ax.com> duke cox.net> writes:
>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:18:17 +0100, "Bill M" bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can anyone supply ANY OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE REPRODUCIBLE EVIDENCE that Any
>>>>GOD exists except in the imaginations of men???
>>>
>>> God is not in the imaginations of men. The one and only living God is real.
>>>
>>
>>I'm curious here: what is your own private definition of "objective
>>verifiable reproducible evidence"?
>
> Technically - it's bullshit. A jury does not need either objective, or
> verifiable...
Show full article (1.44Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9