> On Aug 17, 12:18 pm, Lloyd emory.edu> wrote:> On Aug 17, 6:54 am, mrbawana2u gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>>> Take a look at the revised 1930 through 1950 data, and you'll find not
>>> only 4 of the 10 hottest years since 1880 occurring in the 1930s, but
>>> a 5YM "trend" similar to that building today to boot. You'll also
>>> notice a 2nd zenith is reached in 1940, followed by a gradual drop to
>>> below 1930 levels by 1950.

>

>> I see it's the Big Lie again. First, that correction only affected US
>> data; globally, 1998 is still the warmest. Secondly, the 1990s were
>> warmer than the 1930s. Thirdly, the hottest 5-year periods on record
>> have all been since 1990.

>
> Cite?
> ...

>>>>Why Would Anyone NASA's Trust Climate Data Now?

>>

>>>Because they've been honest enough to admit to a mistake, unlike AGW
>>>fans?

>>
>>They were very reluctant to do that.
>>
>>The fact remains that some of their workers changed things to support
>>AGW.
>>

>What - LQ's even infiltrating your favourite anti-AGW organisation? :)

> On Aug 17, 3:43 pm, Tunderbar gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Aug 17, 12:18 pm, Lloyd emory.edu> wrote:> On Aug 17, 6:54 am, mrbawana2u gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>

>

>>>> Take a look at the revised 1930 through 1950 data, and you'll find not
>>>> only 4 of the 10 hottest years since 1880 occurring in the 1930s, but
>>>> a 5YM "trend" similar to that building today to boot. You'll also
>>>> notice a 2nd zenith is reached in 1940, followed by a gradual drop to
>>>> below 1930 levels by 1950.

>

>>> I see it's the Big Lie again. First, that correction only affected US
>>> data; globally, 1998 is still the warmest. Secondly, the 1990s were
>>> warmer than the 1930s. Thirdly, the hottest 5-year periods on record ...