On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:08:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
hell.corn> transparently proposed:
>On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:27:26 -0800, hoofprints did the cha-cha, and
>screamed:
>> "Text Medium No. 5" wrote:
>>> Hail Eris! On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:38:55 -0800, hoofprints jabbered
>>> inanely:
>>>> "Text Medium No. 5" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I did my introduction differently, this time, because the k00ks are
>>>>> all so notorious that only the odd noob from some Welsh backwater
>>>>> might fail to recognise them.;-{P}
>>>>
>>>> The odd noob's might also 'fail' to recognize that YOU are the reason
>>>> why we need 'birth control'.
>>>
>>> You're not very good at telling apart a frogger from the frogged, are
>>> you.
>>
>> How can one be good at something, when they don't even bother to look at
>> headers?
>> As you are answering and asking this pointed question, I can only state
>> that you must have a reason for claiming that the post was a froggery. but
>> why would someone frog your account over a Kook of the Year voting ballot?
>
>It wasn't a ballot post that was forged or frogged, only a regular post.
>Attribution lines and .sigfiles give it away, too. _You_ are *easy*.
Goofy is the definition of usenet stupid.
--
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
