Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.folklore.computers only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.folklore.computers Profile…
 Up
Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Date: Mar 25, 2008 11:02

from IT project failures
http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/

recent thread:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008f.html#81 Is IT becoming extinct?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008f.html#87 Is IT becoming extinct?

Is IT becoming extinct?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=666

and from 20mar ...

Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau
http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=660

from above:

The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
initiative replacing paper-based data collection methods with
specialized handheld devices for the upcoming 2010 census. The Bureau
has not implemented longstanding Government Accountability Office (GAO)
recommendations and may therefore be forced to scrap the program. Harris
Corp., the contractor associated with this incompetently managed
initiative, was awarded a $600 million contract to develop the handhelds
and related software.
Show full article (1.29Kb)
40 Comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: hancock4
Date: Mar 26, 2008 19:55

On Mar 25, 2:02 pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
> The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
> initiative replacing paper-based data collection methods with
> specialized handheld devices for the upcoming 2010 census. The Bureau
> has not implemented longstanding Government Accountability Office (GAO)
> recommendations and may therefore be forced to scrap the program. Harris
> Corp., the contractor associated with this incompetently managed
> initiative, was awarded a $600 million contract to develop the handhelds
> and related software.

Go back to Hollerith cards.

Seriously, Census records from 1920 and 1930 are now available on
line. What's amazing is that though they're handwritten, they're
machine searchable, that is, type in a name and it will find the
person on a data form. Did modern reseachers have to key in all the
handwritten data? Was it machine encoded all along? (Alpha
processing didn't come along until the 1930s).
5 Comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: kkt
Date: Mar 28, 2008 11:32

hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
> On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
>
>> The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
>> initiative replacing paper-based data collection methods...
Show full article (1.15Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: Steve Ketcham
Date: Mar 28, 2008 14:55

In article zipcon.net>, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
>
>> On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
>>> initiative...
Show full article (1.34Kb)
2 Comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: kkt
Date: Mar 28, 2008 15:23

Steve Ketcham writes:
> In article zipcon.net>, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>
>> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>...
Show full article (1.52Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Date: Mar 28, 2008 15:53

In article zipcon.net>, kkt@zipcon.net says...
> Steve Ketcham writes:
>
>> In article zipcon.net>, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
>>>>> initiative replacing paper-based data collection methods with
>>>>> specialized handheld devices for the upcoming 2010 census. The Bureau
>>>>> has not implemented longstanding Government Accountability Office (GAO)
>>>>> recommendations and may therefore be forced to scrap the program. Harris
>>>>> Corp., the contractor associated with this incompetently managed
>>>>> initiative, was awarded a $600 million contract to develop the handhelds
>>>>> and related software.
>>>>
>>>> Go back to Hollerith cards.
>>>> ...
Show full article (1.68Kb)
no comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Date: Mar 28, 2008 19:28

In article moog.netaxs.com>, rogblake10
@iname10.com says...
> In article zipcon.net>, kkt wrote:
>> Hm. Somehow I thought the individual records were private.
>
> I've always refused to give the Census Bureau any information
> other than the number of people living in the household. That's
> all they are entitled to.

Not true.

--
Keith
no comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: William Hamblen
Date: Mar 28, 2008 20:10

On 28 Mar 2008 15:23:03 -0700, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>Steve Ketcham writes:
>
>> In article zipcon.net>, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne...
Show full article (1.83Kb)
no comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: Peter Flass
Date: Mar 29, 2008 05:41

kkt wrote:
> Steve Ketcham writes:
>
>
>>In article zipcon.net>, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mar 25, 2:02=A0pm, Anne & Lynn Wheeler garlic.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The US Census Bureau faces cost overruns up to $2 billion on an IT
>>>>>initiative replacing paper-based data collection methods with
>>>>>specialized handheld devices for the upcoming 2010 census. The Bureau
>>>>>has not implemented longstanding Government Accountability Office (GAO)
>>>>>recommendations and may therefore be forced to scrap the program. Harris
>>>>>Corp., the contractor associated with this incompetently managed
>>>>>initiative, was awarded a $600 million contract to develop the handhelds ...
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
Re: Billion-dollar IT failure at Census Bureau         


Author: William Hamblen
Date: Mar 29, 2008 07:13

On 29 Mar 2008 08:36:28 GMT, greymaus mail.com> wrote:
>On 2008-03-29, William Hamblen comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 28 Mar 2008 15:23:03 -0700, kkt zipcon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Steve Ketcham writes:
>>>
>>>> In article
Show full article (2.27Kb)
no comments
 
1 2 3 4 5