On Tue, 13 May 2008 18:14:20 -0800
Onideus Mad Hatter
backwater-productions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:33:50 -0700, Wolf 253
netscape.net>
> wrote:
> >>On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:10:07 -0500
>>"Jonathan Herr"
wi.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>> 'Menjy' wrote:
>>>> Bufford L. Hatchett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:39:33 -0400, "Foxx (in a box)"
>>>>>
nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 05:53:19 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>>>>
catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foxx (in a box) wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 05:28:48 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>>>>>>
catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foxx (in a box) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yada yada yada...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, interesting choice of nyms for your email addy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "dracosilver"...hmmm....sounds pretty damn furry to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. "Silver Dragon". Tell me, SilverDragon, how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long have you been a closet furry? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually it mainly came from partially from an old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> password (the color) and a mythical creature I tend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to like (dragon/draco)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do admit though, that I rather admire some the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fursuiter's skills. I know they're not real and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all, but with the amount of work that goes into some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the costumes, I can't help but think that they're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is *so* gay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ming-tard, new fag that you are, you probably have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking cl00 at all as to what we're even talking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about. You probably think a "fur suit" has something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do with mink coats and PETA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And just in case the clueless loser can't understand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you're saying...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a link to a fursuiter that I think really does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good costume-work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://jax.critter.net/coppermine/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You silly, silly little homo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What did you find so funny?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think a web page devoted to freaks who make squirrel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suits to wear while they're packing each others' fudge is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *normal*?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. What I do think is normal is that someone who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually has a skill and a gift is putting it to good use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen the photos of some of his suits, and actually I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think they're cool. Normally those mascot-y type things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you see at easter egg hunts and such creep me out (I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's due to the fact that their faces look have that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'dead/zoned out/lifeless' look about them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jax's fursuits/mascots have a sort of alive-ness about them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that make them seem less like a suit and more like a living
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> character. Take for example, the eyes in this closeup shot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a suit called 'BounderFox':
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That 'quality/realistic' look is IMO, the mark of a skilled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fursuiter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And also the mark of a grade A freak. What does he find so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repellent about his existence as a human being that he has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> basically converted his life into one big Halloween?
>>>>>>>>>>>> My guess would be that the "repellent" would be to
>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledgement that he is the same species as you. Please
>>>>>>>>>>>> take your moralistic problems elsewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no problem if Jonathomo and his pal Baby Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>> pump each other up the ass while dressed in squirrel suits?
>>>>>>>>>> What two consenting adults do in their own lives is of no
>>>>>>>>>> concern to me as long as no one else is being harmed. If they
>>>>>>>>>> want to dress up like squirrels and have sex, fine. If they
>>>>>>>>>> want to be a man and woman, fine. If they want to be two
>>>>>>>>>> right-wing religious nuts like Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes,
>>>>>>>>>> fine. The fact of the matter is that YOU shouldn't be bothered
>>>>>>>>>> by what OTHER people do if YOU aren't involved. Unless you've
>>>>>>>>>> been raped by said Baby Matthew in said squirrel suit then you
>>>>>>>>>> should stick to minding your own business. Elsewise, you show
>>>>>>>>>> yourself to be somewhat like a Jehovah's Witness who won't go
>>>>>>>>>> away or an illiterate solicitor who ignores the posted signs
>>>>>>>>>> and tries to sell your unwanted wares. Attempts to convert
>>>>>>>>>> those who do not or cannot be converted are futile. If you feel
>>>>>>>>>> that you must, pardon the furs, insist on beating a dead horse
>>>>>>>>>> then that is something that you'll need to come to accept as
>>>>>>>>>> your personal character flaw. If you are a man of
>>>>>>>>>> God/god(s)/some higher (state of) being AND if you accept that
>>>>>>>>>> all men/women/whatever will have to answer to that being then
>>>>>>>>>> what business is it of yours to try and dissuade them from
>>>>>>>>>> their chosen path in life? If someone has found that being a
>>>>>>>>>> fur or gay or whatever is true to their path in life then that
>>>>>>>>>> MUST be how they must be. If there is an afterlife or life
>>>>>>>>>> after the current one in which we live then we will most likely
>>>>>>>>>> answer for how we are now in that time. Even at that, it is
>>>>>>>>>> still not your job to "convert the heathens" so-to-speak. If
>>>>>>>>>> you are a reasonable person, which is questionable at this
>>>>>>>>>> point, you would find it best to realize that you and your
>>>>>>>>>> inflammatory opinions are not wanted here and will do little
>>>>>>>>>> good. Further aggravation to the people you're harassing and
>>>>>>>>>> yourself is counterproductive to everyone and their beliefs. I
>>>>>>>>>> would kindly ask you to please put an end to your unwanted
>>>>>>>>>> posts and leave. No threats or repercussions, just the
>>>>>>>>>> knowledge that you're a better person for leaving something
>>>>>>>>>> alone that you cannot change.
>>>>>>>>> Just as they are free to practice their lifestyle, I am
>>>>>>>>> certainly just as free to laugh at them. And it is fucking funny.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So are men of the cloth having sex with the altar boys. Oh,
>>>>>>>> wait. No it's not. Sorry to see the name change with the post.
>>>>>>>> Another one to add to the ignore filter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So really, your rant is one sided. You are all for freedom as long
>>>>>>> as it's yours and not someone else's. Regardless, I am still free
>>>>>>> to laugh at those who engage in lifestyles I find funny no matter
>>>>>>> how you feel about it..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm for freedom. I'm for freedom of blocking the ramblings of
>>>>>> people who don't know better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Better than what? You are free to espouse the fur suit lifestyle, as
>>>>> the other guy is to laugh at it. Me, I don't care either way. But I
>>>>> am bothered by the idea of invoking a Usenet Death Penalty against
>>>>> someone just because he finds the fur suit lifestyle amusing. It is
>>>>> at the very least hypocritical.
>>>>
>>>> I am beginning to get the feeling that, in the best interests of all,
>>>> I should report myself to my newsmaster for my part in this debacle.
>>>> Although I am really not sure what Mr Caputo will decide to do with
>>>> my account when I inform him that I am netcopping myself once again,
>>>> this time for laughing at a guy who dresses in a giant gerbil suit.
>>>
>>> Again with the gerbils. I bet OMH will have a blast making fun of this
>>> apparent gerbil fetish.
>
>>He's busy trying to explain to his MallWart supervisor how his UPA is
>>a separate thing from his work-a-day world :)
>
> My "supervisor" huh? And who is that exactly?
Well you could out yourself further, NaRciCisStIc pErSoNaLiTy b01.
Looks like more
> projection, after all, how could you speak so candidly about something
> you could have no knowledge of UNLESS you were me.
You've blabed all about your "great job", LuN471c.
Obviously you
> aren't me, so the only way you could know is if you were projecting
> your own life experiences. So tell us, Furfag, how did you explain
> your homoerotic furry escapades to your supervisor?
>
What super?
:)
