|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: dankdank Date: Nov 5, 2007 09:10
What motivates psychologists who hypnotize clients and brainwash
them by implanting false memories of childhood abuse?
Has anyone done a psychological profile on these sick persons?
Are they delusional and really believe the memories they implant
are authentic? Were they molested themselves and believe they
are performing a public service by causing innocent people to be
accused of rape? Do they simply enjoy the sense of power they
get from totally fucking with a person's sense of reality?
I can understand a UFO-believer brainwashing someone to remember
being abducted by aliens, but in those cases there isn't any
accusation of a heinous crime against a real person (the aliens
conducting the anal probe are imaginary).
Oh, and has any psychologist ever been convicted for causing a
client to file false charges based on an implanted memory? What
is the law regarding this practice? I remember that the McMartin
pre-school case ended in acquittal, but I don't remember any
charges ever being brought against the psychologists who
"interviewed" the children and assured prosecutors that their
wild tales of hot air balloons and giraffes were true.
|
| |
|
| | 7 Comments |
|
|
Author: HoofprintsHoofprints Date: Nov 5, 2007 11:16
dank wrote:
>
> What motivates psychologists who hypnotize clients and brainwash
> them by implanting false memories of childhood abuse?
First, it isn't just psychologists who practice false memory
brainwashing.
It is done also by using puppets to get children to point to places
where adults have touched or other by social workers and other...
|
| Show full article (2.49Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: HoofprintsHoofprints Date: Nov 5, 2007 11:33
Hoofprints wrote:
>
> dank wrote:
>>
>> What motivates psychologists who hypnotize clients and brainwash
>> them by implanting false memories of childhood abuse?
>
> First, it isn't just psychologists who practice false memory
> brainwashing.
> It is done also by using puppets to get children to point to places
> where adults have touched or other by social workers and other
> counselors.
> If the child doesn't point to a certain point where they were supposedly
> touched, then some will take the lead and place the child's hand or
> finger in the place where they were supposedly touched by the adult or
> other.
> Other types of this hand over hand technique is done with patients who
> can't speak and are being taught to point to things on a keyboard on
> their wheelchairs or other attempting to get them to 'indicate' whether
> they want a glass of water, point here for yes, and point there for no. ...
|
| Show full article (3.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HoofprintsHoofprints Date: Nov 5, 2007 12:08
Hoofprints wrote:
>
> Hoofprints wrote:
>>
>> dank wrote:
>>>
>>> What motivates psychologists who hypnotize clients and brainwash
>>> them by implanting false memories of childhood abuse?
>>
>> First, it isn't just psychologists who practice false memory
>> brainwashing.
>> It is done also by using puppets to get children to point to places
>> where adults have touched or other by social workers and other
>> counselors.
>> If the child doesn't point to a certain point where they were supposedly
>> touched, then some will take the lead and place the child's hand or
>> finger in the place where they were supposedly touched by the adult or
>> other.
>> Other types of this hand over hand technique is done with patients who
>> can't speak and are being taught to point to things on a keyboard on ...
|
| Show full article (3.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: dankdank Date: Nov 5, 2007 12:20
Hoofprints wrote...
> So IMHO, even if the CT. were to 'film the child and the therapist' who
> is attempting to 'elicit' the response, the groundwork for this type of
> lawsuit can be laid _well in advance_ through the home environment and
> training techniques.
> The 'child' who wants to 'please' the parent and get a 'reward', will
> indicate exactly where the other parent showed them to point.
McMartin was an example of false memories being implanted in children,
but often it is adults who are victims of this technique, and the
"recovered" memories are of being abused as a child.
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HoofprintsHoofprints Date: Nov 5, 2007 15:12
dank wrote:
>
> Hoofprints wrote...
>> So IMHO, even if the CT. were to 'film the child and the therapist' who
>> is attempting to 'elicit' the response, the groundwork for this type of
>> lawsuit can be laid _well in advance_ through the home environment and
>> training techniques.
>> The 'child' who wants to 'please' the parent and get a 'reward', will
>> indicate exactly where the other parent showed them to point.
>
> McMartin was an example of false memories being implanted in children,
> but often it is adults who are victims of this technique, and the
> "recovered" memories are of being abused as a child.
>
> I remember reading something about several experiments on how the
> false memory technique works. Apparently it is difficult to implant
> a truly false memory, so an existing memory is isolated and then
> suggestive questioning fills in details that never occurred. One
> subject was able to remember posing for a photo with Bugs Bunny at
> Disneyland, while another subject had an innocent childhood memory ...
|
| Show full article (3.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Nov 5, 2007 18:40
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:10:28 -0800, dank nugget.org> wrote:
>What motivates psychologists who hypnotize clients and brainwash
>them by implanting false memories of childhood abuse?
>
>Has anyone done a psychological profile on these sick persons?
>Are they delusional...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: dankdank Date: Nov 8, 2007 14:47
Robert wrote...
> What motivates you to assume that there is an epidemic of false memory
> implantation (for which there is no evidence), rather than that there
> is an epidemic of sexual abuse of children (for which there is vast
> evidence, eg., the billions paid out to victims by the Catholic
> church) that is being covered up by the abusers, who use false memory
> syndrome as a cynical ploy to blame the victims?
I have no problem with REAL memories of abuse, though even those can't
really be introduced as evidence in court. The problem is when people
who had no memory of an incident suddenly "remember" it after a few
brainwashing sessions with a Dr. Phil headfucker. The extracted memory
is then used to prosecute someone decades after the alleged crime,
an accusation that is impossible to defend oneself against.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
