|
|
 Up |
  |
| Re: CROSS POSTING VIOLATION FROM KATHLEEN DICKSON- CT INMATE #321466 - SENT TO PRISON FOR ONLINE HARASSMENT - ON PROBATION TILL 12/6/06 - PLEASE REPORT HER TO GOOGLE FOR CROSS POSTING |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.flame.psychiatry · Group Profile
Author: Elected Newsgroup leader ChuckElected Newsgroup leader Chuck Date: Sep 21, 2006 08:13
Kathleen wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "LymeQ Ween" yahoo.com> Add to Address BookAdd to
> Address Book Add Mobile Alert
> Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
> yahoo.com. Learn more
> Subject:
>
> Formalized Physical and Psychological Abuse and Negligence by the
> Police, Yale, and Psychiatry
> To: "LymeQ Ween" yahoo.com>, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
> dhaar@courant.com, horgan@courant.com, NEMag@courant.com,
> bmiller@newstimes.com, eliot.spitzer@oag.state.ny.us, trvl@hotmail.com,
> rastro18@aol.com, billcurry@comcast.net, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
> amcguigan@rms-law.com, rjmurzyn@aol.com, Send an Instant Message
> paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message
> sidney_blumenthal@yahoo.com, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
> karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov,
> francam@ucia.gov, governor.rell@po.state.ct.us, fitzmas@gmail.com,
> patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, modelt1918@sbcglobal.net
> CC: Jgerberding@cdc.gov, conndcj@po.state.ct.us,
> executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com,
> news-tips@nytimes.com, dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline.net,
> trvl@hotmail.com, ubinas@courant.com, mas1@concentric.net,
> jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
> leonard.boyle@po.state.ct.us, FalNields@aol.com,
> bransfield@comcast.net, vtsherr@comcast.net, mcneilel@aol.com,
> oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer.com,
> scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, attorney.general@po.state.ct.us,
> patrick.clifford@jud.state.ct.us, thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us,
> cpoitras@courant.com, LoftusHome@cs.com
>
>
> New article about US crowd control weapons below.
>
> =============
> The Americal Psychiatric Association says NOTHING about the abuses at
> Abu Ghraib
> (because the torturers got all some of their ideas from psychiatrists),
> and they
> are nowhere on the new human rights movement being undertaken by Iran,
> Venezuela
> and the Non-Allied minority (poor) nation members of the UN.
>
> The only "ethical" concern the APA has, is that they should not get
> caught
> screwing their patients- See their website to confirm.
>
> APA says nothing about the abuse of black people, and that is because
> many of
> them are Republicans, because of the drug money and perks. Psych.org
> supported
> George W. Bush. Why? The Republican party represents the interests
> of the
> corporations rather than the interests of the people.
>
> Why would the self-alleged brain experts say nothing about all these
> abuses?
> They are many, many groups of
> people who hate psychiatrists. It's time to find
> out if any of the complainers have anything VALID to say in their
> complaints.
>
> The point of a democracy is to have such debates. The newspapers are a
> goof.
> They believe if a doctor says something, it must be right. This is no
> exaggeration, but what was ABUSIVELY explained to me by Bill Hathaway
> at the
> Hartford Courant.
>
> If I am BigPharma, and BigPharma tells *DOCTORS* what is a drug, how
> can doctors
> know more than BigPharma? Why don;t you hear this from other BigPharma
>
> employees? It's another culture. It's also about retiring a
> millionaire, many
> times over, from Pfizer, if you keep your mouth shut.
>
> Pfizer is right here in Lyme Central. Do we ever hear a word out of
> them as
> regards Lyme disease? NO.
>
> Except for the BLATANT LIES I was told by Pfizer's Mike Dunne, head of
> the
> Pfizer Infectious Diseases Division in New London, CT. He said they
> don't
> make
> TROVAN any more. Google TrovaZit.
> http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/trovazit.htm
>
> It is because of this relentless nonsense, and the fact that you can't
> get any
> FACTS published in the newspapers, as well as the incompetence and
> abuse of "law
> enforcement" that I have to keep informing you.
>
> Lyme is a permanent brain infection. It is a "relapsing fever"
> organism. It is
> not a knee-disease.
>
> The Hartford Courant never follows up on this to determine if what I
> say is
> true, by looking at the journal articles I reference. Why don't they
> ever pick
> up the phone and call Yale, and ask them what does this mean?
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids...
> "Neurological symptoms are common manifestations of Lyme disease..."
>
> So, if neurological disease is common, why did they come up with a
> knee-disease
> vaccine?
>
> Kathleen
> -----------------------------------------------
> Published on Wednesday, September 20, 2006 by CommonDreams.org
>
> Rumsfeld's Guinea Pigs: US Citizens at Risk for Military-Weapons
> Testing
> by Heather Wokusch
>
>
> It barely made news last week when Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne
> called for
> the testing of nonlethal weaponry on US citizens in crowd-control
> situations.
> According to Wynne, "If we're not willing to use it here against our
> fellow
> citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime
> situation."
>
> "War on terror" blowback hits Main Street.
>
> But
> it's naïve to think that once developed, US military weapons will
> only be
> used against foreign populations. The Bush administration's "you're
> with us
> or against us" mentality leaves little room for domestic dissent, and
> as the
> line blurs between military and national security technologies, folks
> back home
> will find themselves increasingly targeted.
>
> One example of a crowd-control device possibly coming to your hometown
> is
> Raytheon's Active Denial System heat-beam, which a US Air Force fact
> sheet
> describes as a "focused speed-of-light millimeter wave energy beam to
> induce an
> intolerable heating sensation." How long before a weapon like that is
> illicitly
> used for interrogations, let alone for torture?
>
> There's also the crowd-control Taser, an updated version of the "stun
> gun"
> already authorized for US government use against civilians. The Taser
> delivers a
> short-term electrical charge of 50,000 volts and though
> marketed as a non-lethal
> weapon, has been linked to a number of deaths. While the Taser's
> dart-firing
> technology is of little use for crowd control or on vehicles, a new
> laser
> version of the gun will reportedly be able to deliver a similar
> 50,000-volt
> shock across a crowd.
>
> In other words, protest rallies could soon become much more dangerous
> for those
> with medical conditions (such as heart problems) potentially
> exacerbated by
> electric shocks.
>
> If testing painful heat-beam and electric-shock weapons on hometown
> crowds seems
> a little farfetched, keep in mind that it wouldn't be the first time
> the
> government has used US citizens as guinea pigs for weapons experiments.
> In 2003,
> for example, the Pentagon admitted to having tested biological/chemical
> agents
> on 5,842 service members in secret trials conducted over a ten-year
> period
> (1962-73).
>
> In operations called Project 112 and Project SHAD, the Defense
> Department
> assessed its WMD capabilities on service members aboard Navy ships, and
> in all
> sorts of other despicable ways - including spraying a Hawaiian
> rainforest and
> parts of Oahu. All in all, tests were conducted in six states (Alaska,
> Florida,
> Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Utah) as well as in Canada, Britain and
> Panama.
>
> Many military personnel were not even informed when the toxic agents
> were being
> tested on them, and only decades later, as crucial documents slowly
> become
> declassified, have the veterans' health complaints been acknowledged.
>
> "Could never happen today," you might think, "too many legal
> protections for
> citizens in place." Think again.
>
> There's a tricky clause in Chapter 32/Title 50 of the United States
> Code (the
> aggregation of US general and permanent laws). Specifically, Section
> 1520a lists
> the following cases in which the Secretary of Defense can conduct a
> chemical or
> biological agent test
> or experiment on humans if informed consent has been
> obtained:
>
> (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic,
> pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
>
> (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic
> chemicals
> or biological weapons and agents.
>
> (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot
> control.
>
> The definition is a little too open-ended for comfort; apparently there
> are a
> lot of circumstances under which the Secretary of Defense can test
> chemical or
> biological agents on human beings, but at least informed consent has to
> be
> obtained in advance.
>
> Or does it. Get a load of Section 1515, another part of Chapter 32,
> this one
> entitled "Suspension; Presidential authorization": After November 19,
> 1969, the
> operation of this chapter, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by
> the
> President during the period of any war
> declared by Congress and during the
> period of any national emergency declared by Congress or by the
> President.
>
> You got it. If the President or Congress decides we're at war then
> the
> Secretary of Defense doesn't need anybody's consent to test
> chemical or
> biological agents on human beings. Gives one pause during these days of
> a
> perpetual "war on terror."
>
> It's not a stretch to wonder what kind of clandestine WMD tests the
> Defense
> Department could be conducting in the US right now, on military or
> civilian
> populations, without consent, let alone on populations abroad.
>
> It all boils down to this: If US citizens allow our government to pull
> out of
> international arms control agreements and invest billions in weaponry,
> and if we
> allow ourselves to live in a mindset of perpetual war, then we lose the
> right to
> be surprised when that war and those weapons are inevitably turned
> against us.
>
> Action Ideas:
>
> 1. To
> read a veteran's blog on "men and women used as guinea pigs in
> America's
> military experiments" visit http://testvets.blogsource.com/
>
> 2. Is a university or military facility in your area involved in
> biological
> weapons research? One resource to help you locate biodefense projects
> is Project
> Sunshine's "Map of High Containment and Other Facilities of the US
> Biodefense
> Program," under "Biodefense" at www.sunshine-project.org.
>
> 3. If Tasers are part of your local police force's arsenal you might
> want to
> ask some questions: What training do officers receive regarding how to
> use
> Tasers? In what situations is use authorized? Is it standard operating
> procedure
> to involve a medical responder to check on those who have received the
> Taser's
> strong electric jolt? Similar questions will need to be asked about the
>
> crowd-control version of the Taser, as soon as it is
> released.
>
> This article is partially excerpted from The Progressives' Handbook:
> Get the
> Facts and Make a Difference Now (Volume I) by Heather Wokusch. For more
> Action
> Ideas or to learn more about The Progressives' Handbook series, visit
>
> www.progressiveshandbook.com. Heather can also be reached at
> www.heatherwokusch.com
>
> ###
>
> Why keep checking for Mail? The all-new Yahoo! Mail shows you when
> there are new messages.
|
|
|
|
|
