|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DeserTBoBDeserTBoB Date: May 13, 2008 19:52
You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
that his campaign said he'd lose by maybe 10 points....and that he's
losing now by almost 40. You also have to take a good look at who's
feeding Keith Olbermann his marching orders and talking points...he is
positively INCENSED that Hillary is not cowing to Obama! Must've been
all those black athletes he likes so much. Russert, OTOH, is more
circumspect..."ANYTHING could happen, and it usually does!", words
that visibly tweaked Olbermann, who seems to want to project the Jeff
Immelt-down party line..."shill Obama so McCain can beat him."
Meanwhile Terry McAuliffe elicited a sheepish grin and a couple of
trademark "HAA!"s from Chrissy Matthews, because he wouldn't cave to
Matthew's "she's gonna lose this, right?" questions...
|
| Show full article (1.56Kb) |
|
| | 22 Comments |
|
|
Author: BibsBroBibsBro Date: May 13, 2008 20:05
"DeserTBoB" rglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iekk24p2ou70nikdmt5dt2e95emhk62fjv@4ax.com...> You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
> that his campaign said he'd lose by maybe 10 points....and that he's
> losing now by almost 40. You also have to take a good look at who's
> feeding Keith Olbermann his marching orders and talking points...he is
> positively INCENSED that Hillary is not cowing to Obama! Must've been
> all those black athletes he likes so much. Russert, OTOH, is more
> circumspect..."ANYTHING could happen, and it usually does!", words
> that visibly tweaked Olbermann, who seems to want to project the Jeff
> Immelt-down party line..."shill Obama so McCain can beat him."
> Meanwhile Terry McAuliffe elicited a sheepish grin and a couple of
> trademark "HAA!"s from Chrissy Matthews, because he wouldn't cave to
> Matthew's "she's gonna lose this, right?" questions, instead painting
> Matthews for what he is...yet another hack pundit.
>
> Obuckwheat, for his part, seem to have a sudden case of camera shyness
> tonight as he gets his clock cleaned in WV, and the KY polls are
> looking like a repeat of the same thing while the OR polls show him
> starting to lose steam. Who has it right? Pat Buchanan, of all ...
|
| Show full article (1.95Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: David MoffittDavid Moffitt Date: May 13, 2008 20:10
"DeserTBoB" rglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iekk24p2ou70nikdmt5dt2e95emhk62fjv@4ax.com...
| You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that
%%%%%%%% What did you expect he was running in Robert KKK Byrd's (D) state. Even
if Hitlery wins all of the primaries in the future by the same margin Obama
will still get the nomination. ":o)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: lorad474lorad474 Date: May 13, 2008 20:15
On May 13, 8:05Â pm, "BibsBro" taxachusetts.com> wrote:> "DeserTBoB" rglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:iekk24p2ou70nikdmt5dt2e95emhk62fjv@4ax.com...
>>> You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
>> that his campaign said he'd lose by maybe 10 points....and that he's
>> losing now by almost 40. Â You also have to take a good look at who's
>> feeding Keith Olbermann his marching orders and talking points...he is
>> positively INCENSED that Hillary is not cowing to Obama! Â Must've been
>> all those black athletes he likes so much. Â Russert, OTOH, is more
>> circumspect..."ANYTHING could happen, and it usually does!", words
>> that visibly tweaked Olbermann, who seems to want to project the Jeff
>> Immelt-down party line..."shill Obama so McCain can beat him."
>> Meanwhile Terry McAuliffe elicited a sheepish grin and a couple of
>> trademark "HAA!"s from Chrissy Matthews, because he wouldn't cave to
>> Matthew's "she's gonna lose this, right?" questions, instead painting
>> Matthews for what he is...yet another hack pundit.
>
>> Obuckwheat, for his part, seem to have a sudden case of camera shyness ...
|
| Show full article (2.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Harold BurtonHarold Burton Date: May 13, 2008 20:16
In article 4ax.com>,
DeserTBoB rglobal.net> wrote:
> Who has it right? Pat Buchanan, of all
> people! "She can take California...Colorado...New
> Mexico...Nevada...and if she can take those, she can beat McCain!"
You haven't a clue.
Snicker.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: robwrobw Date: May 13, 2008 20:57
I bet if you asked Hillary whether she would have preferred to loose WV and
maintain her Superdelegate lead she'd have picked the latter.
Your thoughts?
"DeserTBoB" rglobal.net> wrote in message
news:iekk24p2ou70nikdmt5dt2e95emhk62fjv@4ax.com...> You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
> that his campaign said he'd...
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: scottsopersonscottsoperson Date: May 13, 2008 21:42
obama says we should play by the rules. the rules say superdelegates
can nominate hillary.
On May 13, 10:58Â pm, "robw" comcast.net> wrote:> I bet if you asked Hillary whether she would have preferred to loose WV and
> maintain her Superdelegate lead she'd have picked the latter.
...
|
| Show full article (2.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CliffBCliffB Date: May 13, 2008 21:58
On May 13, 10:52Â pm, DeserTBoB rglobal.net> wrote:> You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
> that his campaign said he'd lose by maybe 10 points....and that he's
> losing now by almost 40. Â You also have to take a good look at who's
> feeding Keith Olbermann his marching orders and talking points...he is
> positively INCENSED that Hillary is not cowing to Obama! Â Must've been
> all those black athletes he likes so much. Â Russert, OTOH, is more
> circumspect..."ANYTHING could happen, and it usually does!", words
> that visibly tweaked Olbermann, who seems to want to project the Jeff
> Immelt-down party line..."shill Obama so McCain can beat him."
> Meanwhile Terry McAuliffe elicited a sheepish grin and a couple of
> trademark "HAA!"s from Chrissy Matthews, because he wouldn't cave to
> Matthew's "she's gonna lose this, right?" questions, instead painting
> Matthews for what he is...yet another hack pundit.
>
> Obuckwheat, for his part, seem to have a sudden case of camera shyness
> tonight as he gets his clock cleaned in WV, and the KY polls are
> looking like a repeat of the same thing while the OR polls show him
> starting to lose steam. Â Who has it right? Â Pat Buchanan, of all
> people! Â "She can take California...Colorado...New ...
|
| Show full article (1.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: robwrobw Date: May 13, 2008 22:08
Obama has taken the lead in Superdelegates.
"scottsoperson" aol.com> wrote in message
news:37bea97d-2c25-4d59-ad75-a01c05cccc8e@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
obama says we should play by the rules. the rules say superdelegates
can nominate hillary.
On May 13, 10:58 pm, "robw" comcast.net> wrote:> I bet if you asked Hillary whether she would have preferred to loose WV
and
> maintain her Superdelegate lead she'd have picked the latter.
...
|
| Show full article (2.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Flash BazboFlash Bazbo Date: May 13, 2008 22:45
On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:52:24 -0700, DeserTBoB rglobal.net>
wrote:
>You just have to love her...clobbering Obama like that in a contest
>that his campaign said he'd lose by maybe 10 points....and that he's
>losing now by almost 40.
Then why did his campaign say he would be happy if he came in with
anything over 20%% of the vote? Even Olbermann expected a Clinton
blowout tonight.
http://cbs5.com/campaign08/west.virginia.results.2.723144.html
Obama was in the state on Monday, but it was clear he was looking
beyond the primary.
He said several days ago he expected Clinton to win by significant
margins both in West Virginia and Kentucky, which holds its primary
next week. And on Monday, he tried to set the bar of expectations
exceedingly low, suggesting that anything above 20 percent would
constitute a good showing.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
