say it ain't so, surely those upstanding,righteous,holier than thou,
bible thumping, brave, courageous, know it all hillbillies wouldn't lie
to the 50 million goobers who voted for them

LMAO,

it's beyond my ability to comprehend why GOD, that's THE GOD to yall heathen
hillbillies, would have created so many stupid mother fuckers,

and in just one part of one country, just think how many there are world
wide,

God has a sense of humor and he wanted intelligent people to have something
to laugh about

"HeadMuthaFookerInChargeThirteenSixtyNine" laughing.com> wrote
in message news:rUzlj.27818$8A4.13106@trnddc02...

Just some days ago,Rush came out in the open,in a clear and certain voice
spoke in favour for Mitt Romney.It was a clear endorsement.See how he
retreated on that,and I believe he really check out Mitt's character and
conservatisms.As fast as Ann Coulter dump Mitt Romney,Rush follows along.For
this time,they got it right.Kudos to their discernment.

Who is kidding who?To say that one's faith doesn't matter in Public
office,is like declaring Apostasy.Huck declares that his Faith drives
him.What is it that his Faith drive him to do?He had uttered,"Love your
neighbour as yourself".The agendas of any evangelicals is very clear.Serve
the country with honour,and discharge the duties faithfully and with
integrity so as to glorify the Lord Jesus,and live a clean testimony.In so
doing,others may see the greatness and goodness of the Master,Jesus Christ.

Gwinnett Daily Post ^ | 1-20-2008 | By John Linder

Posted on 01/22/2008 8:45:14 PM PST by nckerr

Huckabee presents the best choice for Reagan supporters

I was first elected to the Georgia House of Representatives 34 years ago. I
have watched this party change for a long time. Some changes have been
better than others.

Two years after that first election, I went to work on the Reagan campaign
for the Republican presidential nomination. I was one of the leaders of that
campaign in Georgia, and my friend, Paul Coverdell, led the establishment's
efforts to nominate President Ford.

It was the typical establishment-versus-interloper campaign. Most of the
friends I had made in the party were in the establishment. Most of them
thought the nomination of Ronald Reagan was not only impractical, but would
destroy our party.

Reagan had just served two terms as the governor of California. His record
was not all that conservative. He signed the biggest tax increase in the
history of the state. He got the best he could get with a Democrat-dominated
general assembly. He signed a bill legalizing abortion. But governors have
different challenges than presidents.

Yup.......It's a GOOD Question.........The Leftist Democrat Pukes are
trying to Blame It on President Bush........But that DOESN'T Hold
Water.........President Bush Didn't Order the Financial Institutions
to make Poor Lending Decisions..........I think America just got TOO
FAT & HAPPY, that's all..........But the Economy is ***STILL*** Doing
Just FINE Anyways...........Donchaknow..........Despite all the
Negative Talk from the Leftist Pukes.............Heehee...........

By Larry Elder

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com

"I'm writing to you on behalf of my son. In the simplest form, what
are the main differences between today's Democrats and Republicans? I
get too complicated with my explanations. I don't think these kids
really know the difference and just vote for a candidate because he is
young, or female, etc. Can you help?"

Sure.

What Republicans Believe, What Democrats Believe

Republicans believe hard work wins, and government should allow you —
to the fullest extent possible — to keep what you earn. Democrats
believe that success results from luck, chance and happenstance, and
therefore a just government takes from those who have and gives to
those who do not.

Republicans believe in a colorblind society determined by drive, work
ethic and talent. Democrats want a color-coordinated society. This
explains the support for race and gender-based preferences to
"correct" past sins and to create "diversity."

-Alaska
Anchorage
Fairbanks

-Arizona
Chandler

-California
Fresno
Los Angeles
San Diego
San Francisco
Sonoma County

-Connecticut
New Haven

-Illinois
Evanston
Cicero

-Massachusetts
Cambridge
Orleans

AN ISRAELI SOLDIER DESCRIBES THE SAVAGERY

My first Lebanon raid was in 1986. I was a 19-year-old Israeli
conscript, and my paratroop platoon was sent to a village whose name I can't
recall.... We broke down the door of a home, shoved the family aside, and
pulled a middle-aged man outside. After blindfolding him and tying his hands
behind his back, we took him to a secluded alley, forced him to his knees,
and put a gun to his head, threatening to shoot if he didn't talk. A U.N.
peacekeeper appeared and put an end to that incident, but there was more to
come.

The next day we performed a mock execution on a 10-year-old Lebanese boy. We
forced his family into the kitchen and dragged him to a nearby orchard. My
lieutenant pressed the child's face into the dirt while I jammed my rifle
against his skull.

Although the officer threatened to shoot his head off, the boy did not
respond, keeping silent...

I was a recent transfer from another unit, and my colleagues were more
familiar with the drill... The elderly, female, and young villagers were
trapped in their homes, ordered to observe a 24-hour curfew. Their men were
gathered in a central square, blindfolded, and hauled off for questioning.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/557551/sentence_lengths_for_terrorists_like...

Brooklyn-born, Islam-converted, Jose Padilla was sentenced to 17 years
and four months for conspiring to help Islamic Jihadist fighters,
according to Kirk Semple of The New York Times. Also according to
Semple, "The sentence was more lenient than the federal sentencing
guidelines recommended and was a blow to the government, which had
requested the maximum penalty of life imprisonment" for Padilla.

But in relative, superlative terms, how much of a sentence is too
lenient, too severe, or inappropriate to the crime?

In contrast at one end of the legal spectrum, a 2005 Justice
Department list of terrorism prosecutions reveals (according to Dan
Eggen and Julie Tate of The Washington Post) a median sentence for
thirty-nine recently convicted was eleven months. At the other end of
the spectrum are the convicted terrorists receiving or facing the
possibility of life sentences:

Also according to Eggen and Tate (and others),

Jan. 2003: British national Richard Reid received a life sentence for
attempting (his efforts thwarted by fellow passengers) to blow up with
a shoe bomb a plane as it flew from Paris to Miami.

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:22:12 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
yahoo.com> wrote:

The Left gives the figure of 40-50 million people with out health
insurance. They don't tell us that 10 million of that figure are not
citizens of the United States according to the census bureau, 17
million can afford their own insurance since they make over $50,000 a
year and 45 percent of the uninsured will be insured again within four
months, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The link posted here

http://www.iedm.org/main/show_editorials_en.php?editorials_id=293

Simpson wrote: