|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Winston Smith, American PatriotWinston Smith, American Patriot
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:36
"Taylor" nospam.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
> 2007: Another year of no domestic terror attacks and a good economy.
No domestic terror attacks???
Didn't we just have something in Omaha and Colorado???
Or do gun-crazed, red-state, Bush-loving morons committing mass murder not
qualify as domestic terrorists??
> "Gandalf Grey" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:47616c95$0$23778$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com...>> 2007: Another Year of War
>>
>> By Bob Burnett
>>
>> Created Dec 12 2007 - 10:01am
...
|
| Show full article (6.66Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Kevin CunninghamKevin Cunningham
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:36
On Dec 13, 12:36 pm, "Doorman" bellsouth.net> wrote:> "3883 Dead" finestplanet.com> wrote in message
>
> news:clq2m3le8u0329vubje7mlhlhikc5des49@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:09:37 -0600, "Doorman" bellsouth.net>
>> wrote:>
>>>> Obstruction of justice is crime even for Presidents and their stooges.
>
>>>And what was the crime that started all this?
>
>> Obstruction of justice, you moron.
>
> Obstruction of what? What crime were they looking at to obstruct?
>
> Was it illegal to fire the attorneys?
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: stjohnstjohn
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:36
> And the Band Played On: On Al Gore, the Nobel Prize, and Holocaust Deniers
>
> By Gregg Gordon
>
> Created Dec 12 2007 - 10:20am
>
>
> Early this morning, after reading the text of Al Gore's Nobel Prize
> acceptance speech on the web, I was puzzling over the comments section of
> that particular site, where several of the scientific equivalent of
> Holocaust deniers had weighed in.
I refuse to debate Holocaut deniers, creationists, global warming deniers
and members of the flat earth society. The debates over long over.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: qwertyqwerty
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:35
"ZNUYBV" hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:fuq2m39rr9iplu6ru47uhmr3vd2ghbaj9d@4ax.com...> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:57:35 -0600, "Doorman" bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>>>Monday, Oct. 1, 2001; 10:48 a.m. EDT
>>WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred
>>from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days
>>to
>>contest the order.
>>The court did not explain its reasons, but Supreme Court disbarment often
>>follows disbarment in lower courts.
>>In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and
>>he
>>paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was brought by a
>>committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.
>>
> Clinton: Don't Disbar Me
> LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Aug. 29, 2000(AP) President Clinton said Tuesday he
> should not be disbarred over his testimony in the Paula Jones sexual ...
|
| Show full article (2.07Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Harry HopeHarry Hope
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:35
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-newmark/iraqafghanistan-vets-de_b_76689.html
December 13, 2007
Iraq/Afghanistan Vets: Dept of Defense Penalizing Wounded Veterans
By Craig Newmark
Hey, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America is doing a lot of
heavy lifting for a lot of troops who are being abused by politicians
in high office. http://www.iava.org/
For example, some wounded vets aren't getting their full enlistment
bonuses:
Some of our injured troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are
facing a ridiculous and unnecessary obstacle.
Because they have been discharged early, they are not receiving their
full enlistment bonuses.
Some are even be asked to return payments they have already received.
A new bill that would ensure this does not continue is gaining
momentum in Congress, and lawmakers need to hear from civilians who
support it.
We can help our nations' veterans on this critical issue.
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Terrorized by BushTerrorized by Bush
Date: Dec 13, 2007 12:34
"ZNUYBV" hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:6j33m3ldp5ekanmdit9js3grqsasqlc43a@4ax.com...
So did Bush.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: FoxtrotFoxtrot
Date: Dec 13, 2007 00:13
3883 Dead finestplanet.com> wrote:
>The White House today was directly accused of authorising the
>waterboarding of al-Qaida suspects, putting President George Bush at
>the centre of a deepening controversy about the treatment of
>detainees.
Great. What's the down side. IIRC Dem Jane Harmon was also
briefed on the use of waterboarding and didn't object.
>Kiriacou did not say how he knew that the coercive interrogations had
>been authorised. However, he said that CIA agents were required to
>offer a "well thought out reason" any time they wished to use
>waterboarding.
>
>In the case of Zubaydah, he told ABC news yesterday that the
>waterboarding had an immediate effect. The al-Qaida detainee began
>talking within 35 seconds, providing information that Kiriacou claims
>disrupted dozens of planned attacks.
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: William December StarrWilliam December Starr
Date: Dec 13, 2007 00:13
In article news.motzarella.org>,
Imam Contemptus Mundi divinepraxeology.org> said:
> MURS radios yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> But, instead of instilling a sense of right and wrong in young
>> boys, the super-libs simply want to indoctrinate all the young
>> boys to "explore their...
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: David JohnstonDavid Johnston
Date: Dec 13, 2007 00:09
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:21:41 -0800, AnAmericanCitizen
earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:33:56 -0700, Click@ Knicklas.com wrote:
> >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:27:21 -0500, "Centurion"
>> empire.com> wrote:
>>>>>Democrats are naturally disappointed even though...
|
| Show full article (1.51Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: George GrapmanGeorge Grapman
Date: Dec 13, 2007 00:06
Says that Clinton only won in 1992 because of Perot. In fact polls
showed that Perot took votes away from both candidates.
He then tells us that Clinton never won majorities in either
presidential race which follows the conservative logic of:
1992 and 1996- Clinton had no mandate because he never had a majority
of the popular vote.
2000- Only the electoral vote mattered.
2004- 51 percent is a mandate.
2006- 53 percent is not a mandate.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121207/content/01125100.guest.html
"Bill Clinton is not a big vote-getter, and he never has been -- not on
the national scene. He couldn't win majorities in his own presidential
races, and he wouldn't have been president the first time if it weren't
for Ross Perot."
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
