Angel wrote:
>
>
> We are quoting the number that was claimed by Eric Logan and Arbitron
> we are still waiting for evidence other than Eric's word.
Are we? Do we really care what an XM shill has to say?
> Assuming Eric is correct, 2+ million at XM, Arbitron puts O&A over 2
> million spread across their 20 something stations. I keep saying 4
> million because the overage has not been defined.
So you are making things up, just like I suspected.
>
> YOU (on the other hand) make outrageous claims to how many fans Howard
> has despite evidence that proves he only has 1.5 million.
No evidence proves that. Your clone regurgitating is just silly now.
> Add a couple dozen phantom subs, a few stolen downloads and 30 people
> per radio and you can get wonderfull numbers for that utter failure.
> But it is what Howard needs to be a success, fake numbers. isn't he
> grand ?
>
Either that of nearly a billion dollars, maybe you can figure it out
after you count all the zeros. Or maybe him saving Sirius could be success.
>
> Sirius would be fine without him. and the cost of his commercials are
> evidence of his failure.
>
They'd be fine, except they'd be a division of XM by now.
>
> I know, you suck with numbers. Get a calculator, we are going above
> basic addition here.
>
Figures confuse you, I should be more careful.
>
>>>>They are all legitimate claims since just about everything the clones do
>>>>has been copied from Howard.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Never once has there been a legitamate claim and as expected, you dont
>>>seem to be willing to be the first to step up and show some proof.
>>>
>>
>>There have been hundreds, the homeless shopping spree being the most
>>recent,
>
>
> which was compared to an intern taking one homeless guy for a haircut
> and a little spending spree. O&A take a dozen of the worse bums they
> can find and let them lose in an upscale mall with a few hundred
> dollars each.
> Fine... you want to call that copying ? I'll accept it. O&A copyed it
> and made it better.
>
Except for the "making it better" part. By the time the clones started
the bit was done to death, especially as a christmas bit.
>
>>Since you need to bury your head in the sand when presented with
>>facts in order to enjoy listening to the radio I won't try to ruin the
>>thing you live for.
>
>
> seems more like you can only think of the thing that was brought up in
> the past week. You dont seem to have a problem attacking me with your
> other fake theories, why else would THIS be different ?
> Obviously it is because you have nothing... as usual
>
>
I brought it up because it was a simple answer that I figured you might
understand, plus I'm not going to google crap because you are too lazy.
>>>4+million people are quite happy with their original content. only a
>>>tiny little 1.5 million dopes think that O&A would clone the person
>>>they hate most in this world.
>>>
>>
>>4 million, 5 million, more than 2 million, I see you are quoting "facts"
>>again.
>
>
>>When they can beat Imus they will have a chance at radio success,
>
>
> and what will you say when they do ? something about the next show
> that is ahead of them, Im sure.
>
Congrats probably. But let them actually climb into the coveted top 15
before we decide.
>>The trick for
>>them will be to never ask for too much money and keep their heads down
>>when the ratings come in.
>
>
> really ? despite the fact that they talk about money and their ratings
> on the show ? interesting theory.
>
Yes. Talking about money is different than demanding it. Test this
theory at your job sometime.
>>
>>I'm sure some intern presented the idea to him
>
>
> Joe Rogan came up with it while they were doing another bit and one of
> their employees came up with the name. All of which was done on the
> air.
>
Sure he did.
>
>
> wrong again, way to do a little research.
>
No thanks.
>
>>Now I
>>understand their appeal to the low IQ'd among you.
>
>
> and yet it seems that O&A fans tend to have a higher IQ than the Howie
> fans.
>
Can you provide one example of this?
>>
>>What is really shocking is that people like you really care enough about
>>him to make up lies about him all day long.
>
>
> I care because I want to see him fail. I do not need to make up lies
Then why do you do it?
>
> You accuse us of resorting to lies because you have sucked on Howard
> tit-o-lies for so long you have lost the ability to discern the
> difference between truth and fiction.
Sorry you are wrong again.
>
> for example.
> Truth: Howard drew 1.5 million subs
> Fiction : Howard has succeeded at anything since
1.1.06
>
>
Your fake numbers won't change Howard's success at Sirius.
>>
>>Again, sorry for using numbers, FIFTY is not EIGHTY, EIGHTY is older
>>thats the higher number.
>
>
> wow, did you just learn that ? your skills are improving.
>
> try this one... 4m>1.5m
>
Try this one ... you are regurgitating lies to make yourself feel better.
