 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: DaveDave Date: Aug 26, 2007 13:31
|
| |
|
| | 16 Comments |
|
|
Author: tphiletphile Date: Aug 26, 2007 18:00
Dave wrote:
That we know of. . . . ;-)
We have no idea of what kinds of plans and inventions he worked on in
The Fortress of Solitude
tphile
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Nicole MasseyNicole Massey Date: Aug 28, 2007 10:04
Since Jules Verne already covered that arena in Master of the World, with a
submersible that both flew and also could drive on roads at incredible
speeds, I don't think it would challenge Doc to reinvent what Robor the
Conqueror did almost half a century earlier.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ted Nolan Ted Nolan Date: Aug 28, 2007 10:17
In article <46d456c6$0$18920$4c368faf@ roadrunner.com>,
Nicole Massey gypsyheir.com> wrote:>Since Jules Verne already covered that arena in Master of the World, with a
>submersible that both flew and also could drive on roads at incredible
>speeds, I don't think it would challenge Doc to reinvent what Robor the
>Conqueror did almost half a century earlier.
>
>
|
| Show full article (0.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TBerkTBerk Date: Aug 30, 2007 13:50
> In article <46d456c6$0$18920$4c368...@ roadrunner.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> Nicole Massey gypsyheir.com> wrote:
>>>>E ven DOC never had one of these
>
>
>>Since Jules Verne already covered that arena in Master of the World, with a
>>submersible that both flew and also could drive on roads at incredible
>>speeds, I don't think it would challenge Doc to reinvent what Robor the
>>Conqueror did almost half a century earlier. ...
|
| Show full article (1.29Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tphiletphile Date: Aug 30, 2007 15:57
TBerk wrote:
>>In article <46d456c6$0$18920$4c368...@ roadrunner.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Nicole Massey gypsyheir.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>E ven DOC never had one of these
>>
>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ted Nolan Ted Nolan Date: Aug 30, 2007 16:29
>
>
>
>Then of course there is the Flying Sub from Voyage to the Bottom of the
>Sea. a classic beautiful design.
>
>tphile
And, iirc, like the "pod" on Lost In Space, a late addition. At least the
Seaview could plausibly have been retrofitted in port..
Ted
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tphiletphile Date: Aug 30, 2007 18:37
Ted Nolan wrote:
>>
>>
>>Then of course there is the Flying Sub from Voyage to the Bottom of the
>>Sea. a classic beautiful design.
>>
>>tphile
>
>
> And, iirc, like the "pod" on Lost In Space, a late addition. At least the
> Seaview could plausibly have been retrofitted in port..
>
> Ted
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Chuck MichaelChuck Michael Date: Aug 31, 2007 04:54
> that was what was so unique with both the Seaview and the Jupiter II. They
> both were bigger on the inside than they were on the outside.
> It was amazing how such a small ship as the Jupiter II was able to carry
> all that equipment and vehicles, from the pod to the chariot.
> no doubt a Doc Savage design ;-)
>
> tphile
Sound like a TARDIS.
chuck
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Phantom21Phantom21 Date: Aug 31, 2007 05:27
Chuck Michael wrote:
>> that was what was so unique with both the Seaview and the Jupiter II.
>> They both were bigger on the inside than they were on the outside.
>> It was amazing how such a small ship as the Jupiter II was able to carry
>> all that equipment and vehicles, from the pod to the chariot.
>> no doubt a Doc Savage design ;-)
>>
>> tphile
>
> Sound like a TARDIS.
>
> chuck
They had a tesseract inside.
Mark
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
