> On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:15:20 -0700, "ThePulp.Net editor"
>
>
>
>
>
> <_visit_the_contact_pa...@thepulp.net> wrote:

>>On 5/7/08 10:18 AM, in article
>>48c14319-11e0-4e38-9d72-f9524db9f...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com, "Ed Hulse"
>>optonline.net> wrote:

>

>>> I wasn't about to sit through the thing; no amount of editing -- fan
>>> or otherwise -- could make that wretched movie any better, IMO.

>

>>Ha! Ed, that was the general consensus at AZ Doc Con, too. It was better,
>>but only marginally.
>>--
>>William Lampkin

>

>>http://ThePulp.Net-- When Your Next Adventure Was Just a Dime Away!
>>Introducing PulpWiki, the online encyclopedia of the pulp magazines.

>
> Lots of guys who do these fanedits have a wealth of material to work
> from: DVDs with tons of supplemental footage, full soundtracks, etc.
> All I had was the German-release DVD and ONE TRACK from the "Fantasy
> Film Music of George Pal" CD (the first incidence of "The Doc Savage
> March", without vocals). �I really was forced to work with what I had.
> And if I couldn't rework the sow's ear into a silk purse, I was
> content to make it a slightly prettier sow's ear...
>
> I would hope that Doc fans would at least give it a fair viewing. �To
> that end, I implored any friends interested in my handiwork to watch
> my version FIRST: I found that anyone attempting to watch the original
> first would never make it to the closing credits - then skip my fan
> edit entirely.
>
> I was disappointed that the Windy City Con showed the original first
> (on Friday), then mine (on Saturday). �I wasn't there but I can just
> imagine...
>
> (sigh)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -