|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: slarkslark Date: May 3, 2008 21:54
Now posted in alt.binaries.multimedia.divx
ENJOY!
|
| |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: ThePulp.Net editorThePulp.Net editor Date: May 6, 2008 21:19
On 5/3/08 9:54 PM, in article 481d416a.70631933@ news.giganews.com, "slark"
sprynet.com> wrote:
> Now posted in alt.binaries.multimedia.divx
>
> ENJOY!
We screened one called "Doc SaLvageD" at last year's Arizona Doc Con. And
apparently there is another fan edit. Which version did they show at Windy
City? (Or was it yet another one?)
--
William Lampkin
http://ThePulp.Net -- When Your Next Adventure Was Just a Dime Away!
Introducing PulpWiki, the online encyclopedia of the pulp magazines.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Ed HulseEd Hulse Date: May 7, 2008 10:18
> We screened one called "Doc SaLvageD" at last year's Arizona Doc Con. And
> apparently there is another fan edit. Which version did they show at Windy
> City? (Or was it yet another one?)
Gee, I didn't know there was more than one. Wish I could give you an
answer,
William, but Doug gave me the fan edit and all I did was plop it in
the player.
I wasn't about to sit through the thing; no amount of editing
-- fan
or otherwise --
could make that wretched movie any better, IMO.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ThePulp.Net editorThePulp.Net editor Date: May 7, 2008 13:15
> I wasn't about to sit through the thing; no amount of editing -- fan
> or otherwise -- could make that wretched movie any better, IMO.
Ha! Ed, that was the general consensus at AZ Doc Con, too. It was better,
but only marginally.
--
William Lampkin
http://ThePulp.Net -- When Your Next Adventure Was Just a Dime Away!
Introducing PulpWiki, the online encyclopedia of the pulp magazines.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: blkhawk62blkhawk62 Date: May 7, 2008 21:50
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 13:15:20 -0700, " ThePulp.Net editor"
>
>
>
>
>
> <_visit_the_contact_pa...@ thepulp.net> wrote: >>On 5/7/08 10:18 AM, in article
>>48c14319-11e0-4e38-9d72-f9524db9f...@ 56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com, "Ed Hulse"
>> optonline.net> wrote:>
>>> I wasn't about to sit through the thing; no amount of editing -- fan
>>> or otherwise -- could make that wretched movie any better, IMO.
>
>>Ha! Ed, that was the general consensus at AZ Doc Con, too. It was better,
>>but only marginally.
>>--
>>William Lampkin
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: slarkslark Date: May 8, 2008 15:03
On Wed, 7 May 2008 21:50:20 -0700 (PDT), blkhawk62@ aol.com wrote:
>I have to admit I enjoyed this edit. Read about this and thought I
>give it a try. Ya did pretty good. Was it perfect? No, but you did
>your best with what you had. You probably by now have heard plenty of
>suggestions. Mine would have been after Doc gave his speech before
>boarding the plane you should have gotten rid of the clapping. Oh
>well. Thank you for getting rid of that horrible song and Monk saying
>"Have no fear..."
>
Thanks for the kind words. "Plenty" of suggestions? I WISH! In the
past year, I've gotten much, much less feedback than you'd think. In
fact, the only rating I got on fanedit.org was my own! (I gave it 5
stars, naturally... :)
|
| Show full article (1.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
