On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:06:55 -0700, Bob Ward email.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:40:14 -0500, QueBarbara
>gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:00:21 -0700, Bob Ward email.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:51:53 -0400, "Don K" dont_bother_me.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what technology he has set up to insure that no unwanted rings
>>>>> happen at his doorbell?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>A bad doorbell switch eliminates unwanted rings.
>>>>Our friends know they should knock instead.
>>>>
>>>>Don
>>>>
>>>My "doorbell" would be a voice that says "You'll have to knock - the
>>>doorbell's busted."
>>
>>Bob Ward: Who rang that bell?
>>AFCA: We did!
>>Bob Ward: Can't you read?
>>AFCA: Read what?
>>Bob Ward: The notice!
>>AFCA: What notice?
>>Bob Ward: It's on the door - as plain as the nose on my face! It...
>>oh...
>>[does a "tisk tisk tisk" expression, goes inside door for a moment]
>>Bob Ward: [hangs the notice and goes back inside]
>>AFCA: [Reading notice, all together] Bell out of order, please knock.
>>[knocks]
>>Bob Ward: Well, that's more like it! Now, state your business!
>
>No note needed - the voice comes on when they push the button.
Inside and outside*?
--
QueBarbara
*Remember, for me yesterday was GDAPSYRTD, so today is SHD**
**stupid hangover day