On Jun 14, 5:40 pm, "Bill Bonde { ''Direct And On Point'')"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:> Mr C wrote:
>
>> On Jun 14, 4:33 pm, "Bill Bonde { ''Direct And On Point'')"
>>
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>>> Mr C wrote:
>
>>>>> Greg Goss
gossg.org> wrote:>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>> What does it mean to be "caught as terrorists"? People are in their
>>>>>> own country and Americans come raiding and take some of them away.
>>>>>> How do we know whether or not a particular prisoner is a terrorist?
>>>>>> Take Bush's word for it?
>
>>>>> Yes. Seriously. We already allow The president to order the summary
>>>>> execution of people so tageed willy nilly, yet we get squeamish at the
>>>>> thought that instead of having thier limbs blown off and bleeding out, we
>>>>> capture them and hold them.
>
>>>> What are you talking about, you insane person? The detainees in
>>>> question were not, nor had they ever been, on a battlefield at risk of
>>>> "bleeding out". They were sitting at home in Sarajevo when they were
>>>> arrested for plotting to blow up the US Embassy.
>
>>> Sarajevo isn't part of the US.
>
>> Thanks for that. Now, if you would mind making some kind of point.
>
> I thought it was obvious that the US doesn't give its
> constitutional rights to non-citizens in other countries.
>
>>>> Even though the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina released them
>>>> for lack of evidence, the US has held them without charge or evidence
>>>> for six years.
>
>>> How do you know what evidence they have?
>
>> I don't know what evidence they DO have, I only know what evidence
>> they DON'T--enough to lock them up.
>
> How do you know that?
Because they're utterly unwilling to make their case.
