On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:20:26 +0100, "*_//B_//B*"
<*TheAngel*@
tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:20:27 +0100, "*_//B_//B*"
>>> <*TheAngel*@
tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:10:43 +0100, "*_//B_//B*"
>>>>> <*TheAngel*@
tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"William Wingstedt"
comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:48a7397f.982113244@Newsgroups.Comcast.net...>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:20:43 +0100, "*_//B_//B*"
>>>>>>> <*TheAngel*@
tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"William Wingstedt"
comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:48a189a7.609398658@Newsgroups.Comcast.net...>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:41:06 -0400, "Hybrid Angel/Messenger"
>>>>>>>>>
comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>~>
>>>>>>>>>>Twonky.......
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Hybrid Angel/Messenger
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The human race needs a parental gene for it's inheritable
>>>>>>>>>>intelligence.
>>>>>>>>>>The missing link....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And we Hybrids have it, in Cain. An intelligent modern man, and a
>>>>>>>>>>premeditating, cold blooded murderer. Better than being evolved,
>>>>>>>>>>and insulting the Chimps or any Ape, as being our ancestor. They
>>>>>>>>>>never committed premeditated, cold blooded murder.....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Chimps do engage in murder. It's premeditated and it's cold
>>>>>>>>> blooded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The Definition of Murder:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Intentional Homicide (the taking of a Person's/Human Being's life by
>>>>>>>>another Human Being of Sound Mind), without Legal Justification or
>>>>>>>>Provocation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very well. The concept of murder must then be mapped onto chimp
>>>>>>> behavior. Call it what you will, a rose by any other name smells just
>>>>>>> as sweet.Thankfully the world is more complex than the mere
>>>>>>> definition
>>>>>>> of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No. Insincerity and Deliberate Willful NONSENSE noted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Legal Definition/Concept of Murder applies ONLY to Human Beings.
>>>>>>Pray tell us how in God's name do you establish 'IDENTITY' before even
>>>>>>trying to establish without Legal Justification or Provocation in the
>>>>>>case of
>>>>>>Apes vs.Apes when Apes are Incapable of 'IDENTIFYING' themselves?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apes cannot be Cross-Examined in a Court of Law to establish Guilt or
>>>>>>no
>>>>>>Guilt. Apes are Animal beings, bound by Instinct, and cannot CHOOSE to
>>>>>>act or be Human Beings & as such are deemed not Guilty of Murder in the
>>>>>>Eyes of the Law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Law therefore concludes that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apes Kill WITH Provocation and WITH Legal Justification in the Jungle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the Legal Justification to Kill? To Eat and Defend *To
>>>>>> Survive*.
>>>>>> (Anything else IS deemed UNLAWFUL).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IOW Animals Naturally/Lawfully Kill *to Survive* in the Jungle,
>>>>>> theWild
>>>>>> or their Natural Habitat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*Amen*
>>>>>
>>>>> Narrow minded attempt to corral vast subject of animal behavior into a
>>>>> courtroom noted and rejected. Carry on...
>>>>
>>>>The only one "Narrow minded" here is you, William.
>>>>
>>>>You are the one that claims Chimps/Apes/Animals engage in premeditated,
>>>>cold-blooded murder, William.
>>>
>>> That's right. Now how is it that human beings are not apes and
>>> animals?
>>
>> *I* have already addressed the Issues of Choice 'and' Identity
>> extensively.
>>
>>>>*I* put you Straight on the matter, but your Ego Obviously can't handle
>>>>it.
>>>>
>>>>In that case...take my *_//B* up your Twisted, Egostistical "Carry on..."
>>>>
>>>
>>> Some sort of attempt at communication? Let me get my lab coat,
>>> clipboard and goggles. I'll analyse it and get back to you.
>>
>> *I* have communited all there is to communicate to you, Mr Willful...
>>>
Of course you have. How wonderful it must be to operate completely
independent of egotistical willfulness...
snip
