Anti-war Dem wakes up, sez "Duh!"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.economics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.economics Profile…
 Up
Anti-war Dem wakes up, sez "Duh!"         


Author: Dennis
Date: Jul 21, 2008 12:18

FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES

HEAD: Confessions of an anti-Iraq War Democrat

By Lanny Davis, a prominent Washington lawyer and a political analyst for
Fox News Channel. In 2007 and 2008, he made multiple appearances on cable TV
in support of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign. From 1996
to 1998, he served as special counsel to President Clinton.

I remember the exact moment I had my first serious doubts about whether I
was 100 percent right that the U.S. pre-emptive invasion of Iraq and the
take-out of Saddam Hussein was a serious mistake.

I had been strongly opposed to the U.S. intervention from the start. I felt
this way even though I believed (as did most everyone, including the
intelligence community) that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and even
though I thought that he was a murderous, genocidal thug and the world would
be better off - and the U.S. safer - with him dead.

However, I reasoned, the WMD inspectors were back in, and we had Saddam
surrounded - thanks to George Bush, by the way, for which we Democrats did
not give him sufficient credit at the time.
Show full article (5.14Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Anti-war Dem wakes up, sez "Duh!"         


Author: Patriot Games
Date: Jul 21, 2008 12:50

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:18:10 -0400, "Dennis" never.net>
wrote:
>FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES
>HEAD: Confessions of an anti-Iraq War Democrat
>By Lanny Davis, a prominent Washington lawyer and a political analyst for
>Fox News Channel. In 2007 and 2008, he made multiple appearances on cable TV
>in support of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign. From 1996
>to 1998, he served as special counsel to President Clinton.
>I remember the exact moment I had my first serious doubts about whether I
>was 100 percent right that the U.S. pre-emptive invasion of Iraq and the
>take-out of Saddam Hussein was a serious mistake.
>I had been strongly opposed to the U.S. intervention from the start. I felt
>this way even though I believed (as did most everyone, including the
>intelligence community) that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and even
>though I thought that he was a murderous, genocidal thug and the world would
>be better off - and the U.S. safer - with him dead.
>However, I reasoned, the WMD inspectors were back in, and we had Saddam
>surrounded - thanks to George Bush, by the way, for which we Democrats did
>not give him sufficient credit at the time.
>So why risk the uncertainties of a pre-emptive invasion, loss of life and ...
Show full article (5.50Kb)
no comments