["Followup-To:" header set to alt.drugs.pot.]
On 2008-09-07, The tragedy of balding men with long hair
gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 7, 1:16 am, Giselle Wittgenstein
>
americanconservative.org> wrote:>> Pros:
>> - Dead Saddam
>> - No terror on American soil in 7 years; terrorists on the run
>> - Democratized Iraq
>> - Clinton Credit Crisis contained
>> - Lower taxes, tax rebates for hard-working American families
>>
>> Cons:
>> - Slightly higher gas prices
>> - ...?
>>
>> Worst president ever? Only if you're smoking crack.
>>
>> GWB is the man.
>
>
> Dead Saddam? You mean the dictator that America helped put in power
> in Iraq and keep in power? The man we armed? So what, now we're
> replacing him with a puppet democracy that has to give us what we want
> or we won't leave? Thousands die for a sham democracy and the death
> of a man who we helped enthrone. Great job, Bush. Thanks for
> ignoring the terrorists who attacked us and instead invade a country
> that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks. Genius.
Jimmy Carter is to blame for the disaster in the middle east.
> No terror on America's soil. Since few of the safeguards recommended
> by the 9/11 Commission haven't been enacted by Bush and since the war
> on terror is only creating more terrorists--as estimated by the CIA
> and other intelligence agencies--it won't be long before terrorists
> attack the United States again.
The country is much safer than ever thanks to Bush. Clinton made our
country so weak that a few rag tag militants we able to seize airliners
and crash them into buildings. Of course and idiot like you probably
thinks we did that to ourselves.
> Democratized Iraq. Nonsense. They have no sovereignty. They are an
> occupied nation who must abide by the United States mandates. How is
> that a democracy? When America leaves, then let's talk about Iraq
> being a democracy.
Woman can vote in Iraq.
> Clinton's yadda yadda yadda. Did you forget to mention Clinton's
> federal surplus spent and now we have the largest federal deficit
> ever?
The surplus he created by cutting military spending and closing bases?
> Lower taxes...for the very rich. And this during a time of war.
> These tax breaks for the rich have succeeded in only one thing:
> increase the gulf between the rich and everyone else and also eroded
> what little remains of the middle class. Last time there was this
> level of wealth disparity was immediately prior to the Great
> Depression. There is a connection between wealth inequity and
> economic downturns.
I am not rich and I benefited from Bush's cuts.
> I notice that you didn't mention Enron in the con grouping. Enron had
> close ties with the Bush administration. You didn't mention the
> housing bubble popping nor the mortgage scandal nor the failure of
> several banks and Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. All of these failures
> were set in motion over twenty years ago when the knuckleheaded
> Republicans thought it would be keen to deregulate everything. When
> the economists started predicting these events, instead of admitting
> that deregulation doesn't work, the Republicans and Bush specifically
> ignored the approaching storm.
You mean the lending giants your democrats will now bail out? HA! They
brought it upon themselves. The economy was excelent until Pelosi and
her cronies got in.
> Also, in the con grouping: The politicizing of many of the agencies
> under the Bush administration, which is illegal.
> The firing of US Attorneys for failure to illegally ignore Republican
> crimes and to manufacture false charges against Democrats.
Where is your proof other than left wing blogs and
moron.org?
>
> I could go on but we've all seen all of the negatives that Bush has
> brought upon America.
You could go on and on but then your propganda will become even more
boring.
> What is astounding is that there are people who
> still support Bush.
Clinton lied to your face then admited the lie and yet here you are
still supporting him.
> When you come on here and make false arguments to
> defend Bush, you're wasting your time because most of us Liberals and
> Democrats know our stuff. If you want to defend Bush, try it with
> your family, friends and coworkers because most Americans are ignorant
> as to what really happened in the White House.
ITYM knowing your liberal propaganda well. Reading peoples lies and memorizing
it, is not knowing "stuff".
HAND
--
evul
