> As some of you may know, Canada *was* going to pass laws making
> possesion of small amounts of pot a finable (word?) offence as opposed
> to a criminal offence. Last night I saw a doc about the person mentioned
> in the subject, who was running an online seeds website and a tv
> (internet only?) called pot TV. Apparently at the time that Cretien
> mentioned the intent of the Liberal Govt. The US Drug Czar (damn that
> just sound opposite to what it is!) very quickly visited Canada
> (apparently to do something about this - in his mind - nonsence). He
> gave a talk where the above heckled everything the czar and reps, of the
> RCMP said that was incorrect - such as addiction/danger inherent in the
> drug etc. After this news conference...

> As some of you may know, Canada *was* going to pass laws making
> possesion of small amounts of pot a finable (word?) offence as opposed
> to a criminal offence. Last night I saw a doc about the person mentioned
> in the subject, who was running an online seeds website and a tv
> (internet only?) called pot TV. Apparently at the time that Cretien
> mentioned the intent of the Liberal Govt. The US Drug Czar (damn that
> just sound opposite to what it is!) very quickly visited Canada
> (apparently to do something about this - in his mind - nonsence). He
> gave a talk where the above heckled everything the czar and reps, of the
> RCMP said that was incorrect - such as addiction/danger inherent in the
> drug etc. After this news conference...

> On Oct 28, 11:03 am, fanghorn wrote:

>> As some of you may know, Canada *was* going to pass laws making
>> possesion of small amounts of pot a finable (word?) offence as
>> opposed...

> Olde Hippee yahoo.com> wrote innews:1193671156.060576.148070@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Oct 28, 11:03 am, fanghorn wrote:

>>> As some of you may know, Canada *was* going to pass laws making
>>> possesion of small amounts of pot a finable (word?) offence as
>>> opposed to a criminal offence. Last night I saw a doc about the
>>> person mentioned in the subject, who was running an online seeds
>>> website and a tv (internet only?) called pot TV. Apparently at the
>>> time that Cretien mentioned the intent of the Liberal Govt. The US
>>> Drug Czar (damn that just sound opposite to what it is!) very quickly
>>> visited Canada (apparently to do something about this - in his mind -
>>> nonsence). He gave a talk where the above heckled everything the czar
>>> and reps, of the RCMP said that was incorrect - such as
>>> addiction/danger inherent in the drug etc. After this news
>>> conference, apparently he met with the Feds and the plan was dropped. ...

> On Oct 29, 3:43 pm, fanghorn wrote:

>> Olde Hippee yahoo.com> wrote
>> innews:1193671156.060576.148070@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>

> Our government is out of control. We have a total idiot for
> a president. Would Canada please invade on the pretext of regime
> change like the US seems to do so often? I could get used to hockey,
> and some of that good BC bud (you guys hog all of the good stuff and
> send us the beasters eh?). :-)
> BudBurner
>
>

> BudBurner hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:1193706032.519396.224520@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
>

>> On Oct 29, 3:43 pm, fanghorn wrote:

>>> Olde Hippee yahoo.com> wrote
>>> innews:1193671156.060576.148070@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>>

>

>> Our government is out of control. We have a total idiot for
>> a president. Would Canada please invade on the pretext of regime
>> change like the US seems to do so often? I could get used to hockey,
>> and some of that good BC bud (you guys hog all of the good stuff and
>> send us the beasters eh?). :-)
>> BudBurner
>>
>>

>
> Tell you what we'll do it, but the NFL has to lose a lawsuit for theft ...