GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.drugs.pot only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.drugs.pot Profile…
 Up
GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: curmudgeon
Date: Nov 1, 2007 12:28

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin

This looks like one for the ACLU.
As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
First Amendment?

*CUR*
14 Comments
GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: curmudgeon
Date: Nov 1, 2007 12:53

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin

This looks like one for the A.C.L.U.
As repulsive as this sort of behavior is.
Is this not the sort of thing expressly protected under the
First Amendment ?
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Date: Nov 1, 2007 20:32

curmudgeon wrote:
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>
> This looks like one for the ACLU.
> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
> First Amendment?
>

I don't see it as being an ACLU issue if they aren't getting
government funds.
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Rev Turd Fredericks
Date: Nov 1, 2007 20:32

curmudgeon wrote:
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>
> This looks like one for the ACLU.
> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
> First Amendment?
>
>
> *CUR*
>
>
I don't by any means condone the actions of the church, but that really
does look like their right to free speech is being taken away. Which
part of "free" does the court not understand?

--
Geeks may inherit the earth,
but they have no desire to rule it

-Robert Stevens (the Geek Squad founder)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Rev Turd Fredericks
Date: Nov 1, 2007 20:37

sparrow.sign@yahoo.com wrote:
> curmudgeon wrote:
>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>>
>> This looks like one for the ACLU.
>> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
>> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
>> First Amendment?
>>
>
> I don't see it as being an ACLU issue if they aren't getting
> government funds.
>
Does the ACLU not come to the aid of anybody whose right to free speech
is violated?

--
Geeks may inherit the earth,
but they have no desire to rule it

-Robert Stevens (the Geek Squad founder)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Onideus Mad Hatter
Date: Nov 1, 2007 21:24

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:32:40 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
catholic.org> wrote:
>curmudgeon wrote:
>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>>
>> This looks like one for the ACLU.
>> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
>> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
>> First Amendment?
>>
>>
>> *CUR*
>>
>>
>I don't by any means condone the actions of the church, but that really
>does look like their right to free speech is being taken away. Which
>part of "free" does the court not understand?
Show full article (3.65Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Rev Turd Fredericks
Date: Nov 1, 2007 21:45

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:32:40 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
> catholic.org> wrote:
>
>> curmudgeon wrote:
>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>>>
>>> This looks like one for the ACLU.
>>> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
>>> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
>>> First Amendment?
>>>
>>>
>>> *CUR*
>>>
>>>
>> I don't by any means condone the actions of the church, but that really
>> does look like their right to free speech is being taken away. Which
>> part of "free" does the court not understand?
> ...
Show full article (1.80Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Onideus Mad Hatter
Date: Nov 1, 2007 22:42

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:45:00 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
catholic.org> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:32:40 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>> catholic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> curmudgeon wrote:
Show full article (7.37Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Onideus Mad Hatter
Date: Nov 1, 2007 22:49

On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:27:05 -0800, Onideus Mad Hatter
backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:45:00 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>catholic.org> wrote:
>
>>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:32:40 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>> catholic.org...
Show full article (4.42Kb)
no comments
Re: GOD is LOVE but not in Kansas         


Author: Rev Turd Fredericks
Date: Nov 1, 2007 22:41

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:45:00 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
> catholic.org> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:32:40 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>> catholic.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> curmudgeon wrote:
>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/01/2078940.htm?section=justin
>>>>>
>>>>> This looks like one for the ACLU.
>>>>> As repulsive as this sort of behaviour is,
>>>>> Isn't this sort of thing expressly protected under the
>>>>> First Amendment?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *CUR*
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
Show full article (6.26Kb)
no comments
1 2