|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: CurtCurt Date: Jan 27, 2008 17:13
On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
Shouldn't the real question b
-- what kind of a "free country"
tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
with that?
Curt
|
| |
|
| | 31 Comments |
|
|
Author: Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential CandidateJorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:10
"Curt" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6d5e2b3e-70ec-4f85-abdb-59de5eef13a4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
| On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
| > About 50%% of employees are tested.
| > So to pay tax you get tested.
| > So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
| > receive government money?
| >
| > http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
|
| Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
| tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
| with that?
What kind of "free country" tolerates drug infested parasites mindlessly
preying on their fellow citizens?
http://www.kansas.com/news/local/story/274919.html
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Sanders KaufmanSanders Kaufman Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:24
> On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:>
> Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
> tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
> with that?
Since *their* drug of choice was opium - I think the answer might be a
resounding "no".
Indeed - Ben Franklin himself was a *serious* party-monster.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Sanders KaufmanSanders Kaufman Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:27
> What kind of "free country" tolerates drug infested parasites mindlessly
> preying on their fellow citizens?
What a stupid question
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential CandidateJorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:52
"Sanders Kaufman" kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:m1bnj.41960$Pv2.36804@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
| "Curt" gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:6d5e2b3e-70ec-4f85-abdb-59de5eef13a4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
| > On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
|
| >> http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
| >
| > Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
| > tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
| > with that?
|
| Since *their* drug of choice was opium - I think the answer might be a
| resounding "no".
| Indeed - Ben Franklin himself was a *serious* party-monster.
|
|
"A penny saved is a penny earned.......Duuuude...."
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential CandidateJorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate Date: Jan 27, 2008 22:03
"Starkiller" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nljqp3ptj3e0mnpnevundct06025eta1re@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:13:19 -0800 (PST), Curt
| gmail.com> wrote:
|
| >On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
| >> About 50%% of employees are tested.
| >> So to pay tax you get tested.
| >> So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
| >> receive government money?
| >>
| >> http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
| >
| >Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
| >tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
| >with that?
| >
| >Curt
|
| I worked for a company once that decided they would start andom ...
|
| Show full article (4.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: john smithjohn smith Date: Jan 28, 2008 00:14
>
> "Curt" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6d5e2b3e-70ec-4f85-abdb-59de5eef13a4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> | On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
> | > About 50%% of employees are tested.
> | > So to pay tax you get tested.
> | > So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
> | > receive government money?
> | >
> | > http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
> |
> | Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
> | tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
> | with that?
>
> What kind of "free country" tolerates drug infested parasites mindlessly...
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: john smithjohn smith Date: Jan 28, 2008 00:16
"Starkiller" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nljqp3ptj3e0mnpnevundct06025eta1re@4ax.com...> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:13:19 -0800 (PST), Curt
> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:>>> About 50%% of employees are tested.
>>> So to pay tax you get tested.
>>> So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
>>> receive government money?
>>>
>>> http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html>>
>>Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
>>tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
>>with that?
>>
>>Curt
>
> I worked for a company once that decided they would start andom ...
|
| Show full article (3.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: john smithjohn smith Date: Jan 28, 2008 00:21
"Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate" wrote in
message news:5fenj.3535$nK5.2075@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...>
> "Starkiller" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:nljqp3ptj3e0mnpnevundct06025eta1re@4ax.com...
> | On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:13:19 -0800 (PST), Curt
> | gmail.com> wrote:
> |
> | >On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
> | >> About 50%% of employees are tested.
> | >> So to pay tax you get tested.
> | >> So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
> | >> receive government money?
> | >>
> | >> http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
> | >
> | >Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
> | >tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up
> | >with that?
> | > ...
|
| Show full article (5.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential CandidateJorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate Date: Jan 28, 2008 08:09
"john smith" bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:l9gnj.7852$421.4215@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
|
| "Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidential Candidate" wrote
in
| message news:gQanj.846$R84.406@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
| >
| > "Curt" gmail.com> wrote in message
| >
news:6d5e2b3e-70ec-4f85-abdb-59de5eef13a4@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
| > | On Jan 26, 1:53 pm, SMITH29 comcast.net> wrote:
| > | > About 50%% of employees are tested.
| > | > So to pay tax you get tested.
| > | > So what would be wrong with welfare recipients being tested to
| > | > receive government money?
| > | >
| > | > http://www.reason.com/news/show/28584.html
| > |
| > | Shouldn't the real question be-- what kind of a "free country"
| > | tolerates mandatory pee testing for ANYONE? Would the FFs have put up ...
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
