> In news:alt.drugs.pot, fanghorn posted on Wed, 17
> Sep 2008 21:45:22 +0000 (UTC):
>

>> Oh yes. Lets add yet *another* unsafe way to vote so the voting
>> process can be tampered with even more. Nothing works better
>> than paper ballots marked with a HB pencil and counted by
>> impartial people. Probably nothing ever will.

>
> Obviously the way it's set up now isn't being monitored by impartial
> people. I'd go so far as to say that people who have a fetish for
> counting ballots might well be in it either to find a way to
> manipulate the votes, or they're there because they know, within
> themselves, they are honest and will do a good job. And I think the
> chore attracts some in betweens. Either way, fraud is going to
> happen.
>
> There is a way to vote over the internet with biometrics. You get one
> vote for your biometric readout. If there's any question about your
> vote, they just call you up and ask. The only thing you have to do is
> have your biometric records on file with the government.
>