Re: Drug War Chronicle, Issue #536 -(urls + editorial)- 5/16/08 - No stinkin' badges...
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.drugs.pot only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Drug War Chronicle, Issue #536 -(urls + editorial)- 5/16/08 - No stinkin' badges...         

Group: alt.drugs.pot · Group Profile
Author: Mycoloteur
Date: May 16, 2008 19:56

On May 16, 8:52 am, bobbie sellers california.com> wrote:
> Drug War Chronicle, Issue #536 -- 5/16/08
> Phillip S. Smith, Editor,http://stopthedrugwar.org/user/psmithhttp://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536
>
> A Publication of Stop the Drug War (DRCNet)
> David Borden, Executive Director,http://stopthedrugwar.org/user/borden
> "Raising Awareness of the Consequences of Drug Prohibition"
>
> New Offer: Clergy Against the War on Drugs Videohttp://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/clergy_against_the_war_on_dru...
>
> Students: Intern at DRCNet to help stop the drug war now!http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/drcnet_internships_to_stop_th...
>
> Enough is Enough: Stop the Deadly SWAT Raids:http://stopthedrugwar.org/raidpetition
>
> Table of Contents:
>
> 1. FEATURE: BATTLING MILITARY IMPUNITY IN MEXICO'S DRUG WAR
> As the US Congress begins to move toward passing a massive
> anti-drug aid package aimed mainly at the Mexican military,
> abuses by soldiers in the drug war there have prompted a serious
> legal challenge.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/mexico_military_human_rights_...
>
> 2. FEATURE: VANCOUVER'S SAFE INJECTION SITE FIGHTS FOR ITS LIFE
> -- AGAIN
> Time is running out for Vancouver's InSite, the only
> officially-sanctioned safe injection site in North America. The
> Conservative government of Canadian Prime Minister Harper has
> until June 30 to re-authorize the program, which it dislikes,
> and InSite supporters are now engaged in a major campaign to
> ensure its continued existence.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/vancouver_insite_safe_injecti...
>
> 3. LAW ENFORCEMENT: DEATH OF FLORIDA STUDENT FORCED TO BECOME A
> SNITCH SPARKS PROTESTS IN TALLAHASSEE
> The killing of a Florida State University student who became an
> informer after being busted on drug charges has provoked angry
> protests by her friends and fellow students.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/rachel_hoffman_informant_protes...
>
> 4. OFFER: NEW CLERGY ANTI-DRUG-WAR VIDEO
> Clergy are speaking out against the war on drugs! Donate $16 or
> more (or whatever you can afford) and we'll send you a copy.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/clergy_against_the_war_on_dru...
>
> 5. STUDENTS: INTERN AT DRCNET AND HELP STOP THE DRUG WAR!
> Apply for an internship at DRCNet for this fall (or spring), and
> you could spend the semester fighting the good fight!http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/drcnet_internships_to_stop_th...
>
> 6. LAW ENFORCEMENT: THIS WEEK'S CORRUPT COPS STORIES
> The evidence goes missing in Galveston, a pill-hungry cop goes
> down in Oklahoma, a pill-peddling cop gets popped in New Jersey,
> and another pill-peddling cop goes to prison in Indiana.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/police_drug_corruption
>
> 7. MEDICAL MARIJUANA: GOP ATTACKS OBAMA FOR SUGGESTING HE WOULD
> END RAIDS
> The Republican National Committee Wednesday attacked Sen. Barack
> Obama for suggesting he would end DEA raids on medical marijuana
> providers in states where it is legal. Given broad popular
> support for medical marijuana, it is not at all clear that this
> will be a winning issue for the GOP.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/gop_attacks_obama_over_medica...
>
> 8. PREGNANCY: SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS WOMAN'S
> MURDER CONVICTION FOR FETAL DEATH AFTER COCAINE USE
> Regina McKnight was the first woman in South Carolina charged
> with murder for having a stillborn child after using drugs while
> pregnant. Now, after almost a decade behind bars, the state
> Supreme Court has overturned her guilty verdict, saying she had
> poor legal representation and was the victim of shoddy science.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/regina_mcknight_south_carolin...
>
> 9. LATIN AMERICA: PROHIBITION-RELATED VIOLENCE SURGES IN MEXICO
> More than 100 people, including several top federal police
> commanders, have been killed in surging prohibition-related
> violence in Mexico in recent days as the so-called drug cartels
> strike back hard against police, soldiers, and each other.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/mexico_prohibition_related_vi...
>
> 10. CANADA: MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION RETAINS MAJORITY SUPPORT,
> POLL FINDS
> Canada's Conservative government wants to crack down on
> marijuana, but it's out of step with the population. According
> to a new poll, 53%% want to legalize it.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/canada_marijuana_legalization...
>
> 11. EUROPE: DESPITE BRITISH MARIJUANA RECLASSIFICATION, NO JAIL
> FOR LOW-LEVEL SELLERS
> The new tough line on marijuana signaled last week by the
> British government when it reclassified the herb may not be so
> tough after all. The British Sentencing Guidelines Council says
> small-scale sales and cultivation should be punished by
> probation and fines in most cases.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/british_marijuana_sentencing_...
>
> 12. SOUTHEAST ASIA: VIETNAM PONDERS DRUG DECRIMINALIZATION
> The Vietnamese National Assembly is considering decriminalizing
> drug possession. But with most drug users sent to detox camps
> under administrative regulations instead of criminal charges, it
> might not make much difference in the real world.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/vietnam_ponders_drug_decrimin...
>
> 13. DEATH PENALTY: MALAYSIA SENTENCES TWO TO HANG FOR MARIJUANA
> TRAFFICKING, IRAN EXECUTES NINE DRUG SELLERS
> Two Thai citizens have been sentenced to death in Malaysia over
> 75 pounds of marijuana, and nine convicted drug sellers go to
> the gallows in Iran.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/death_penalty_iran_malaysia
>
> 14. WEEKLY: THIS WEEK IN HISTORY
> Events and quotes of note from this week's drug policy events of
> years past.http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/drug_war_history
>
> (Not subscribed? Visithttp://stopthedrugwar.orgto sign up
> today!)
>
> ================
>
> 1. Feature: Battling Military Impunity in Mexico's Drug Warhttp://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/536/mexico_military_human_rights_...
>
> Lawmakers in the United States this week took the first steps
> toward approving a $1.6 billion dollar, three-year anti-drug
> assistance package for Mexico that is heavily weighted toward
> aid for the Mexican military. The Mexican army needs all the
> help it can get as, with 30,000 troops deployed against violent
> drug traffickers by President Felipe Calderon, it wages war
> against the so-called cartels, say supporters of the package.
>
> But even as the aid package, known as Plan Merida after the
> Mexican city where US and Mexican officials hammered out
> details, was being crafted, the Mexican military was once again
> demonstrating the risks of using soldiers for law enforcement.
> On the evening of March 26, near the town of Santiago de los
> Caballeros in the municipality of Badiriguato in the mountains
> of the state of Sinaloa, a five-man military patrol opened fire
> on a white Hummer driven by a local man back from the US. When
> the smoke cleared, four people in the vehicle were dead, two
> were wounded -- and there was no sign of any weapons.
>
> It was the second time in less than a year that soldiers in
> Badiriguato had opened fire, killing multiple innocent
> civilians. Last June, three school teachers and two of their
> young children were killed
> (http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/490/mexico_drug_war_calderon_iraq)
> when soldiers at a checkpoint perforated their vehicle with
> bullets. That case went away after the military paid their
> families $1,600 each.
>
> Seeing yet another unjustified killing by the military was
> enough for Mercedes Murillo, head of the independent human
> rights organization the Frente Civico Sinaloense (Sinaloa Civic
> Front). The veteran activist saw her brother assassinated in
> September after discussing the June killings on his radio
> program, but that didn't stop her from filing a lawsuit designed
> to end what is in effect impunity for soldiers who commit human
> rights offenses against civilians.
>
> Under Mexican law -- the result of a post-revolutionary
> political settlement designed to keep the military out of
> politics -- members of the military do not face trial in the
> civilian courts, but in special military courts. This fuero
> military, or military privilege, results in soldiers charged
> with human rights abuses being judged by members of their own
> institution, and all too frequently, being absolved of any
> wrongdoing no matter what the facts are.
>
> Now, Murillo and her legal team, acting on behalf of the widow
> of the Hummer driver, have filed suit in Sinaloa district court
> in Mazatlan, challenging the fuero system. She doesn't expect
> immediate success, she said.
>
> "This is the first case presented in Mexico against the actions
> the army has taken," said Murillo. "We know that when we present
> this in Mazatlan, the judges will give us nothing. Then we must
> take it to the Supreme Court of Mexico, and there might be
> people there who will study what we are presenting."
>
> But Murillo isn't counting on the Mexican courts; her vision
> goes beyond that. "I don't think we can win here, but even if
> the Supreme Court says the military can do what it wants, that
> will lay the groundwork for going to the Inter-American Court.
> Military impunity violates international treaties that Mexico
> has signed," she argued.
>
> The Organization of American States' Inter-American Court of
> Human Rights and Inter-American Commission of Human Rights
> (http://www.oas.org/oaspage/humanrights.htm) are autonomous
> institutions charged by the hemispheric organization with
> interpreting and applying the American Treaty on Human Rights
> and ensuring governments' compliance with it. Mexico is a
> signatory to that treaty.
>
> "Using the military for drug enforcement in Mexico is a serious
> problem," agreed Ana Paula Hernandez of the Tllachinollan Human
> Rights Center of the Mountains (http://www.tlachinollan.org) in
> the southern Mexican state of Guerrero. In addition to being one
> of the most impoverished areas of the country, the mountains of
> Guerrero have long been home to poppy and marijuana farmers, as
> well as the occasional leftist guerrilla band over the decades.
> The military has been deployed there for years.
>
> But while most attention these days is focused on the military's
> deployment to fight the cartels in major cities, Hernandez cited
> the military's more traditional drug war role: manual illicit
> crop eradication. "It's an almost impossible and useless task
> since illicit crop cultivation is an issue of survival in the
> mountain region, as in other parts of the country," she said.
> "In these regions, farmers have two options -- either they grow
> illicit crops or they migrate, so of course they will continue
> to find ways to grow illicit crops. It will never end unless the
> social and structural reasons for it are addressed."
>
> But instead, successive Mexican governments have sent in the
> military to root out the poppy and pot fields. At least, that is
> their stated purpose, but Hernandez isn't sure they're serious.
> "This is the excuse for deploying the military in many rural and
> indigenous regions, but in many cases it's more about a
> counterinsurgency strategy than a crop eradication strategy,"
> she said.
>
> The military presence in such regions is "an intimidating and
> threatening" one, said Hernandez. "They set up camp wherever
> they like, often destroying licit crops and harvests in the
> process, stealing the water from the community, entering
> people's homes to take their food, stopping people on the roads
> to interrogate them, and so on. Worse yet, the military has
> become one of the main perpetrators of human rights abuses in
> the region, committing violations as serious as sexual rape for
> example," Hernandez said. "This is something that is very common
> but that is rarely denounced."
>
> Tlachinollan has documented some 80 cases of human rights
> violations carried out by members of the military in the region
> in recent years, including the rape of two women, Valentina
> Rosendo Cantu and Ines Fern�ndez, by soldiers in 2002, said
> Hernandez. But because of the military court system, nobody has
> been punished.
>
> "Justice has not been carried out in a single case," she said.
> "It is very difficult, almost impossible, to obtain justice in
> cases where the military is involved. They remain untouchable to
> a certain degree and without a doubt, absolutely unaccountable
> to society for their actions."
>
> As for Cantu and Fernandez, they have given up on Mexican
> justice and are now seeking redress before the Inter-American
> Human Rights Commission. Their case is pending after a hearing
> last October.
>
> While Mexican citizens and activists struggle to rein in the
> military, some US experts wonder whether involving soldiers in
> drug law enforcement does any good anyway.
> "We don't think it's a problem that can be solved militarily,"
> said Joy Olson, executive director of the Washington Office on
> Latin America (http://www.wola.org). "The use of the military in
> the drug war is not a new thing -- they continually bring in the
> military because the police are either too weak or too corrupt
> to deal with the traffickers -- but the question is whether it
> can deal with the challenge at hand, and we don't think so," she
> said.
>
> But even if the military is unable to stop drug production and
> trafficking, it will continue to be the backstop for
> hard-pressed Mexican politicians unless real reforms take place,
> Olson said. "We need to be talking about significant police
> reform. Until that happens, the military will be used over and
> over again without solving the problem."
>
> Murillo agreed that police reforms were necessary, and vowed
> never to give up the fight for justice. "They killed my brother
> because he criticized the army," she said, "but we are so used
> to the soldiers now that we are not scared. I have nothing to
> lose. My sons and daughters are married, my husband is 82. If
> they kill me, I don't care. That's the only way to work. You
> can't be afraid."
>
> ================
>
> later
> bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com)
>
> --
> bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco
>
> "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
> It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed,
> the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning.
> It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion."
> --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste.

After reading about the various shenanigans, I wrote this:
The cost of prohibition
Comment posted by Anonymous on Fri, 05/16/2008 - 6:51pm

This just demonstrates (again) the costs associated with attempting to
legally regulate people's consciousness:

- officials in all levels of govt corrupted by the incredible
potential profits that are a product of prohibition,

- well-armed, violent, powerful, inner-city gangs supported by drug
profits which are in turn a product of prohibition.

- prisons that are not able to properly handle the violent offenders
because they are full of typically non-violent drug users.

- drug users that we might actually be able to rehabilitate don't seek
treatment because of a figurative (or in some cases literal) death
penalty.

It was clear during alcohol prohibition, and it is clear now.
Prohibition causes more harm than good.

You tight-asses need to get over your need to control others! *You*
are destroying society with your hopeless belief that everyone should
think and act like you or be beaten into submission.

Here is the truth.
If people want to use a drug they will. You can not stop them. Its
been proven over and over throughout recorded history.

Its true that some drugs are really pretty dangerous but no matter how
dangerous, that does not mean that the well intentioned idea of
preventing access is a good one. If you could *prevent* access, it
might be a great idea, but you can not.

Indeed, prohibition is particularly laughable when you realize that we
are surrounded by "dangerous" drugs naturally occurring in foods and
other plants and animals. Today, any reasonably intelligent and
motivated fifteen year old kid can from natural sources, in their own
kitchen/backyard produce any or all of the following: alcohol, opium/
morphine, LSA (a close cousin of LSD), 5-meo-dmt, DMT, mescaline,
salvinorin, psilocin, as well as number of other psychedelic, sedative
and narcotic drugs. Very soon, most of those 15 yos will actually
*know* that they are able. For example, DMT alone, one of the most
powerful and useful/interesting of psychedelic drugs, can be extracted
from many hundreds of different plants and animals with little or no
special equipment. (incidentally, all these assertions are easily
verifiable fact)

So, since it is impossible to prevent access what happens when you try
anyway? Well, what happens is that since it is available, people who
want it try to obtain it. i.e., a market. Since its illegal its a
"black market". That means high prices, dangerous quality
misinformation and assorted other crime and disease. Prohibition is
like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.

Even among most of the zealots, the issue is supposedly one of
reducing harm. (protect the children, cost to society, etc) and in
that context the idea that we allow people to use some substances and
not others seems on the surface to be rational. But then we see
alcohol and tobacco, either of which are more harmful than many of
their illegal brethren and we see that there is a great hypocrisy at
work. We see that society says yes, "it is ok to alter your mind, even
to harm or poison yourself and others" as long as you use an accepted
poison. Now, of course they don't want to admit that, because the
supposed health risks are one of the ways that they rationalize the
prohibition of cannabis and a number of other beneficial substances.

However, the facts are clear. For example, look at the the legal
status of alcohol vs. cannabis I won't even have to enumerate all the
ways that this is backwards, I will pick just one: There are millions
of people who have died from abusing alcohol. There is NOT ONE
documented death attributable to cannabis alone.

Why then is alcohol legal? Because they already discovered that they
*CAN NOT STOP PEOPLE FROM USING ALCOHOL, AND THAT THE DEATH AND CRIME
CAUSED BY PROHIBITION WAS GREATER THAN THE DEATH AND CRIME CAUSED BY
PEOPLE USING IT LEGALLY AND AT LEAST IF ITS LEGAL AND REGULATED,
THERE'S MONEY TO PAY FOR/MITIGATE THE REAL ISSUES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED
WITH ITS USE.* YEAH ! They figured that out more than 70 years ago.
Unfortunately, they forgot it almost immediately or didn't realize
perhaps that alcohol was actually a drug just like all the others and
they immediately started prohibition all over again with various other
drugs.

When will they make that same discovery with cannabis whose cost of
legality is much lower than alcohol's? Hell, cannabis has been
medicine and food and clothing and technology for humans for all of
recorded history and into archaeological history as well. Even if
cannabis is discovered to be mildly harmful its is obviously far less
harmful than alcohol (looking even at death rate alone).

Perhaps sometime they will realize that this is probably true for
every drug that people might abuse: i.e., prohibition not only does
not work, it actually causes much more harm than doing nothing, and is
literally nonsense compared to education/treatment in terms of
actually reducing the net harm to society.

I get all the drugs I want or need directly from god in the form of
numerous plants and animals that he gave us, so I am near to the point
that don't care if they ever figure it out. However, I just hate to
see people suffer needlessly, so I hope for their (and their kids)
sakes that they figure it out soon.

Love and Light
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!