|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Pete nospam ZakelPete nospam Zakel Date: Jul 23, 2006 10:22
In article anubis.demon.co.uk> huge@huge.org.uk writes:
>Smoking causes cancer. I am completely convinced of that.
Then why do people who smoke cannabis and nothing else not get any more cancer
than non-smokers?
>And smoking
>one kind of leaf (or other vegetable matter) is not significantly
>different from any other kind.
Even though the smoke from smoking different kinds of leaves have
significantly different chemical compounds?
Tobacco smoking DEFINITELY causes cancer, emphysema, heart disease,
circulatory disease and bronchitis.
Cannabis smoking DEFINITELY causes bronchitis.
Cannabis smoking has not been shown to cause cancer, emphysema, heart disease
or circulatory disease.
How do you explain this fact if, as you believe, "smoking one kind of leaf ...
is not significantly different from any other kind"?
|
| Show full article (1.47Kb) |
|
| | 15 Comments |
|
|
Author: Phil StovellPhil Stovell Date: Jul 23, 2006 11:38
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:18:23 +0000, Huge wrote:
> Simple - it isn't a fact. It's wishful thinking on the part of cannabis
> consumers combine with too small, improperly controlled studies almost
> all conducted by people with an agenda.
|
| |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
|
Author: JAFJAF Date: Jul 23, 2006 12:34
On 23 Jul 2006 11:57:47 -0700, "arclight" system-x.info> wrote:
>rate of death from cancer amongst cannabis users
Whatever.
Have you ever thought of learning punctuation?
--
JAF
anarchatntlworldfullstopcom
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Phil StovellPhil Stovell Date: Jul 24, 2006 01:19
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:12:30 +0000, Huge wrote:
> On 2006-07-23, Phil Stovell stovell.org.uk> wrote:>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:18:23 +0000, Huge wrote:
>>
>>> Simple - it isn't a fact. It's wishful thinking on the part of cannabis
>>> consumers combine with too small, improperly controlled studies almost
>>> all conducted by people with an agenda.
>
> Scientific American? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
SciaAm are merely the messengers. What have you got against SciAm?
>
> Tobacco use not properly controlled for.
|
| Show full article (1.45Kb) |
| 10 Comments |
|
|
Author: Phil StovellPhil Stovell Date: Jul 24, 2006 03:26
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:49:57 +0000, Huge wrote:
> On 2006-07-24, Phil Stovell stovell.org.uk> wrote:>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:12:30 +0000, Huge wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-07-23, Phil Stovell stovell.org.uk> wrote:>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17...
|
| Show full article (2.58Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: bobbie sellersbobbie sellers Date: Jul 24, 2006 08:04
On 24 Jul 2006 08:49:57 GMT,Huge, wrote
> On 2006-07-24, Phil Stovell stovell.org.uk> wrote:>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:12:30 +0000, Huge wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-07-23, Phil Stovell stovell.org.uk> wrote:>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006...
|
| Show full article (3.41Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
|
|
|
