>
>
> MushMouth wrote:
>

>> "Paisely Sky" retina.net> wrote in message
>> news:459D6BE2.8FEF94B1@retina.net...

>>>
>>>
>>> MushMouth wrote:
>>>

>>>> "Paisely Sky" retina.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:459D285F.3332AA25@retina.net...

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MushMouth wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> "Paisely Sky" retina.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:459C791B.6E1A52E4@retina.net...

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pj wrote:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:18:14 GMT, Paisely Sky
>>>>>>>> retina.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>pj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:08:04 GMT, Paisely Sky
>>>>>>>>>> retina.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>Has that new movie about the Queen's reaction to Diana's
>>>>>>>>>>>death
>>>>>>>>>>>gotten
>>>>>>>>>>>over
>>>>>>>>>>>there yet. If so, what do Brits seem to think about it?

>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In set theoretical terms, I think the intersection of the set
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> brits
>>>>>>>>>> who care about the royal family, and the set of brits who are
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> psychedelics, is the empty set.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well, I'm into psychedelics (although it's been quite a while
>>>>>>>>>since I
>>>>>>>>>tripped)
>>>>>>>>>and I'm interested in Diana. I think she was a great force for
>>>>>>>>>good
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>the world
>>>>>>>>>before she died. Kinda reminded me of John Lennon and some of
>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>counter-culture public figures from the sixties. I think she
>>>>>>>>>was a
>>>>>>>>>bit
>>>>>>>>>naive in
>>>>>>>>>some ways, but she had an enormous positive influence on the
>>>>>>>>>world,
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>my
>>>>>>>>>opinion. too bad she died---for the *world* I mean. The world
>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>quite a
>>>>>>>>>different place now that her voice is gone, wouldn't you agree?

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No I don't I'm afraid. She was pretty and sweet. Then she became
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> typical socialite. I fail to see the enormous positive influence
>>>>>>>> she
>>>>>>>> had.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She was a big help in destigmatizing aids.

>>>>>> i didnt know that, but philidelfia, and the show melrose place
>>>>>> helped,
>>>>>> freddi mucury, & arthure ash, and 100's of other people, the
>>>>>> princess
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> not the face of aids advocacy i knew,

>>>>>
>>>>> You must be pretty young, then. Or you must not have ever watched
>>>>> the
>>>>> news.
>>>>>

>>>> has any one else here seen shit about her, that was not bullshit P.R
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She brought attention to the problems of

>>>>>>> third world children.

>>>>>> michael jackson, heral the world, we are the world, uhh countledss
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> people,

>>>>>
>>>>> So what? There's always room for one more.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> i never said no

>>>
>>> Look, I'm not trying to cannonize Diana. Yes, I'll admit that her PR
>>> image
>>> was
>>> that of a fairy tale princess, something she couldn't have possibly
>>> been
>>> in real
>>> life. But I admire how she used it. The image she created had enormous
>>> power,
>>> and she was learning to use it for great good. However, the Dodi thing
>>> showed
>>> just how naive she could be about PR. Either that or it shows she may
>>> not
>>> have
>>> cared about her PR as much as we thought. But probably the best
>>> explanation is
>>> that she started believeing her own PR to the point where she thought
>>> she
>>> could
>>> do know wrong (in the realms of PR).
>>>
>>> There are a lot of rich people who aren't saints but who try to do good
>>> in
>>> the
>>> world. Danny Thomas was one. He created the best children's hospital in
>>> the
>>> world: St Jude Children's Hospital.
>>>
>>> I think you come down on Diana a little too hard. Yes, I believe
>>> royalty
>>> is a
>>> hold over from the past that has outlasted its usefulness. But she did
>>> manage to
>>> be more useful, in my opinion, to the world at large, by promoting
>>> peace
>>> and
>>> compassion, than the royal family she married into.
>>>

>>
>> your right was talking with a friend and we started talking about this
>> subject, and it hit me... in highschool i studied Photography and 1994
>> when
>> this happend i set my gaze on hollywood for graduation, Celeb photography
>> would have been my stock and trade. when the photographers were hit with
>> the
>> blame for her death, it set me off and i never took her name well again,

>
> OK. But she wasn't the one making those allegations. She was too dead at
> the
> time and wasn't returning calls.
>
> :-D
>
> I must say that I don't have much respect for paparazi in general, but it
> is the
> people who buy the tabloids who fuel the demand. On the other hand, Diana
> obviously used the paparazi for publicity when she wanted to. It's like
> making a
> habit of leaving milk out for the neighborhood cats. You shouln't be
> surpirised
> when they start coming around all the time, even when you may not want
> them
> around. If she had been a private person *all the time*, then I would have
> understood her not liking the paparazi. But she wanted them around
> sometimes.
>

>
>

>> we
>> all are in controle of our destiny on new years rolling with my boy who
>> was
>> tipsy, was my choice and if it killed me then i am to blame, her driver
>> was
>> drunk and any one could have made a smart desition in that situation, and
>> there was no need to speed, a flash never killed any one, try it flash
>> your
>> self, a photo never stole a soul, so there paranoya killed them... sorry
>> yes
>> i was critical of her, my bad, i didnt even think that, that shit was a
>> balance on my views of her as a person... again my bad
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> again i dont remember the princess

>>>>>
>>>>> Then you must have a short memory.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> no i remember those that matter

>>>
>>> Fair enough. Everyone has a different idea about who and what matters
>>> most.
>>>

>>
>> word, hell you might no know the importance of kool herc but in my
>> community, people would have know more of his contributions than hers...
>> this is true, i guess its what you place importance on
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> doing it, modona has done more
>>>>>> for the third world "visably" may be she did more but i didnt see
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> you mixing her up with mother terasa

>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Mother Teresa was not perfect either. But I wouldn't compare
>>>>> the
>>>>> two.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> LOL

>>>
>>> I believe Mother Tersa's compassion was honest. But she had what I
>>> consider to
>>> be flaws which I can't quite understand. Still, I admire her
>>> accomplishments and
>>> will readily acknowledge she was a far better person than I am, or most
>>> people
>>> are.
>>>

>>
>> me too, not catholic but respect self sacrifice
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> they both died around the same time,
>>>>>> its easy to get them confused LOL

>>>>>
>>>>> I loved Mother Teresa, but if I had the chance to go to bed with one
>>>>> of
>>>>> the two,
>>>>> well...
>>>>>
>>>>> :-D
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> i'm with you on that one LOL
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She got involved in an attempt to ban land mines world wide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> paul mccartney, paul simon, prince,

>>>>>
>>>>> So what? There's always rooms for one more voice against the evils
>>>>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>> world.
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> again i didnt say no just that she didnt enter my visual spectrum

>>>
>>> I see.
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> there was mad more but i forgot, i'm not
>>>>>> sure i remember her at thos benifits, FYI even O.J Simpson help in
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> effort, look it up LOL
>>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> what you have nothing to say here LOL, what was he bad? manson was a
>>>> hippy... he hung with the beachboys too, so ones stance does not
>>>> reflect
>>>> ones heart

>>>
>>> Charles Manson? He was a sociopathic serial killer. He had the ability
>>> to
>>> manipulate people, brainwash kids on acid and convince them to murder
>>> for
>>> him,
>>> ruining their lives in the process, not to mention the lives of those
>>> they
>>> killed.
>>>
>>> I see nothing admirable about Charles Manson. He had cunning. He was
>>> extremely
>>> intelligent. That's all. But he used it in the worst way imaginable.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> LOL nooo i was not batting for him, i was just saying he was a hippy and
>> hung with the beach boys thats it... i was batting for O.J i love him

>
> Oh, I see. Someone else posted a positive thread about him recently. I
> obviously
> misunderstood you.
>
>
>

>>
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> She did some charity stuff - like a lot of wealthy socialites,
>>>>>>>> but what did she change? I see no similarity with
>>>>>>>> counter-culture
>>>>>>>> figures from the sixties.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She adopted the same kinds of social issues, for one.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> "counter-culture figures from the sixties." you might want to
>>>>>> rethink
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> shit LOL

>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> counter culture was to go agenst the grain, to deny the established
>>>> norms,

>>>
>>> Well, counter-culture wasn't a homogenous thing. It was comprised of
>>> many
>>> different contradictory influences. One *aspect* of counter-culture
>>> reflects
>>> what you describe. But that is the aspect I was/and am opposed to.
>>>

>>
>> good for you, but if you dont remember the culture at the time was war
>> mongering, biggoted, close minded and sheeps, i guess you think that shit
>> was well and good, the point of being counter culture anti establisment
>> was
>> that the establishment was contaminated, and needed to be rebooted, so to
>> say you were agenst the cut and pase action here.................
>> "counter

>
> I've lost that part of the thread. Can't remember the context or the
> details.
> Sorry.
>
>
>

>>
>> culture was to go agenst the grain, to deny the established norms"|"One
>> *aspect* of counter-culture reflects what you describe. But that is the
>> aspect I was/and am opposed to" then you were agent malcom, martin,
>> bobby,
>> panters, weather men, beatles, dylan, sly and the family stone, hendrix,
>> gandi, every freedom fighter, and peace activist, and the list goes on,
>> counter culture agenst the grain... again forgive me for rehashing this
>> but
>> were does the princess fit in with these people, i do agree with you that
>> she used the press and P.R to spot light some well established causes,
>> but
>> the diffrence between them and her was they started something she signed
>> her
>> name to it, to be a revolutionary you must be on your feet and running,
>> no
>> time for P.R thats why to quote Scott Heron "The revolution will not be
>> televised" thats the counter culture, i'm not sure if you listened to the
>> interviwes of john and yoko on there bed in, they were lambasted by the
>> counter culture press on using the bujwa press, like i said befor, lennon
>> new when he was full of shit, thats what made him real, but he knew the
>> bullshitwould fit for the cause, even though he hated that fact, but
>> since
>> he would be in the public "have them cover whay you want them to" sorry
>> for
>> the rant
>>

>>>

>>>>
>>>> "counter"-"culture" what of that is the rejected princess
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, she was also a rich socialite and took advantage of the
>>>>>>> perks
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> her
>>>>>>> position.
>>>>>>> And she was self-promoting. Her "saint-like" public image was
>>>>>>> carefully
>>>>>>> crafted. She
>>>>>>> was not without flaws. But I think she was generally a
>>>>>>> compassionate
>>>>>>> person. And it
>>>>>>> was how she *used* her public persona that I was impressed with.
>>>>>>> She
>>>>>>> took
>>>>>>> a page
>>>>>>> right out of John Lennon's book, in my opinion.
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>> stop saying that shit!!! fuck her she was no lennon damb it,

>>>>>
>>>>> I dodn't say she was a John Lennon. Jesus, when will you people
>>>>> learn
>>>>> how
>>>>> to
>>>>> fucking read. I said she *took a page from John Lennon's book*.
>>>>> Which
>>>>> she
>>>>> obviously did.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> but what page would that be? tiger beat poster

>>>
>>> lol
>>>
>>> No. The idea that as long as she is going to be in the public eye
>>> *anyway*, then
>>> why not use that moment to advocate issues that were near and dear to
>>> her
>>> heart.
>>> That page.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> hay never mine my above paragraph LOL

>
> :-D
>
> no problem
>
> I'm growing ever more confused.
>
>
>

>>
>>

>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>> Well, maybe you are too young to know this. But John and Yoko
>>>>> decided
>>>>> that
>>>>> as
>>>>> long as they were going to be in the media anyway, they might as
>>>>> well
>>>>> use
>>>>> their
>>>>> moment in the public eye to bring attention to good causes, like
>>>>> world
>>>>> peace.
>>>>> Diana, obviously, learned that lesson and did the same thing with
>>>>> her
>>>>> celebrity.
>>>>> That's all I meant. Anything you gathered from my statement other
>>>>> than
>>>>> that is
>>>>> all in your own mind.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> i'll accept that,... "sorry for pushing buttons"

>>>
>>> No problem.
>>>

>> thanks
>>

>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> lennon was not
>>>>>> a poster or photo with i love ny shirt, he was no saint but resides
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> heaven due to the fact that he was real, she was fake, she was
>>>>>> walking
>>>>>> P.R.
>>>>>> madison ave poster girl, that why the prince left her for his pet
>>>>>> horse...
>>>>>> he knew she was fake and so did every one else, she didnt have a
>>>>>> stigmata,
>>>>>> she was not christ, che was no fucken Lennon, and if you asked Yoko
>>>>>> she'd
>>>>>> tell you the same

>>>>>
>>>>> Do you speak for Yoko?

>>>>
>>>> yes, we are kindred sprits...

>>>
>>> Then can I borrow some money?
>>>
>>> :-D
>>>

>>
>> does she lone money, uhh no she kicks people off there land, one of the
>> things i hate about he, lennons uncle i think, lennon gave him a home,
>> when
>> he died she kicked him off of the land "BITCH!!!!"

>
> lol
>
> That sounds like her all right.
>
>
>

>>
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>> I think Yoko would be the first to praise Diana for her public
>>>>> activities.
>>>>> She
>>>>> was doing exactly the same kind of thing John and Yoko were doing
>>>>> with
>>>>> their
>>>>> celebrity. And you seem to forget that Yoko is probably almost as
>>>>> wealthy
>>>>> as
>>>>> Diana was. The royals, after all, are mainly land rich. Why do you
>>>>> not
>>>>> fault
>>>>> Yoko for her luxurious lifestyle and capitalist ways. Yoko is a
>>>>> shrewd
>>>>> business
>>>>> woman who became rich due to her shrewdness in managing Lennon's
>>>>> fortune
>>>>> and
>>>>> increasing it dramatically.

>>>>
>>>> yoko was rich befor lennon, read a bio.

>>>
>>> Her family was rich, but she often ran out of money. In fact, that was
>>> why
>>> she
>>> went to England to try to meet a Beatle.

>>
>> bull mothata fucken shit people,

>
> Wait a second. Let me tell you where I got that. You may be right. It may
> not be
> true. But it sounds true.
>
> I read an unauthorized biography about Yoko Ono. But it was a very
> well-written
> book. I already knew quite a lot about her from reading a book about the
> Beatles
> by Pete Shotton, one of John's oldest and dearest friends, who remained
> close
> with John from the time they were both 11 years only until John and Yoko
> left
> for New York. It was an excellent book. It really rang true. It reflected
> the
> John and Yoko I knew from the interviews I'd read.
>
> I almost didn't read the unauthorized biography of Yoko, because, unlike a
> lot
> of Beatles fans, I liked Yoko from the start, and respected John's
> decision to
> quit the Beatles and go with Yoko. So I wasn't going to read another
> hatchet job
> in her. But after thumbing through the book, I started to realize it
> didn't look
> like a hatchet job. Yoko can be as tough as nails. Pete Shotton made that
> clear.
> I already knew that. Frankly, after I finished the biography I had more
> respect
> for Yoko than ever. It wasn't entirely flattering, but it seemed
> thoughtful and
> well-balanced, in my opinion. In fact, one of the points in the book was
> that
> Yoko deserved much more respect as an artist, and finally got it from the
> artistic community, years after John died. The book suggested that her
> promising
> career as an artist pretty much ended when she became involved with John.
> The
> book could hardly have prasied her importance as an artist more highly.
> The book
> also said that her musical talents weren't properly appreciated until
> years
> after John's death.
>
> OK. Here's what it said about Yoko going to England. It said that she
> needed
> money for art projects. She had relied on financial backers before but
> needed a
> new one. The book said that it was her husband at the time, Tony Cox, who
> got
> the idea of going to England to try to see if they could get one of the
> Beatles
> to finance her art projects. So they went to England. They tried to meet
> the
> Beatles but had no success. Then she managed to put an art exhibit
> together and
> John happened to come by one day. (Everyone knows that story). The book
> went on
> to say that Yoko was immediately smitten with John, which neither Tony or
> Yoko
> had counted on. And the rest is history.
>
> The book said that it was Tony's idea to hit up one of the Beatles to
> support
> Yoko's art projects, but it never happened. It wasn't like a con-game, but
> a
> shot at getting a financial backer. Later, she met John by chance and they
> fell
> in love. That doesn't sound so far-fetched to me.
>
> I can't know if it is true, of course. But it sounds plausible. And the
> rest of
> the book was very well ballanced and well researched, in my opinion. It
> was a
> perfect reflection and extension of the Pete Shotton book.
>

>
>

>> Lennon said and i quote "i met her for the
>> first time at her art exibit" "and fell inlove with the idea" "in the
>> font
>> room there was a ladder that lead to a tiny picture with a magnifine
>> glass
>> and the picture said 'YES' if it sad something negitive like 'fuck off'
>> or
>> something like that i would have walked out" he fell for her, not the
>> other
>> way around, theres a CD collection you might want to pick up called
>> lennon
>> remembers its a blayboy interview, he talks about every thing its 4CD 2
>> sets
>> of two disc lennon remembers life with the lions and working class hero,
>> well good shit, there are also some good radio interviews with him and
>> yoko
>> a "day on the radio", "last interview", "the last word", "west wood one
>> collection 218CD's lost lennon tapes" of what i have them all but only
>> listend to the first 60, not to mention many many other cd's of
>> interviews
>> of them both... you might not want to pull that bullshit on a fan, i'm a
>> fan

>
> Read the above. I'm a fan too. I was never one of the ones who didn't like
> Yoko.
> John was my favorite Beatle. I accepted Yoko from the beginning. In fact,
> I
> couldn't understand why other people didn't as well.
>
>

>

>>
>>
>> She wanted one of them to finance her

>>> art projects. Her family would only give her so much financial support.
>>> They
>>> would keep her from starving and keep a roof over her head, but that's
>>> about it
>>> in those days.

>>
>> again he came to her not the other way around, she was married to a
>> millionareand devorced him when she fell in love with lennon,

>
> I don't think Tony Cox was a millionaire. I've never heard that. It was
> her
> family who had money. They were bankers and investors. I'm not sure even
> they
> were millionaires, but they may have been.
>

>
>

>> that shit you
>> can read in wiki, you dont need the cd's, see i'f i was not a fan i would
>> have believed this bullshit, hey why not email her go to my
>> myspace.com/powerquee she's there, she does on occasion replys. get it
>> right!

>
> As I said, read the above. You may change yout mind about what I was
> trying to
> say.
>
> Yes, it would be interesting to ask her about that. But I wouldn't. It
> sounds
> too gossipy. I would rather ask her something about her philosophy on
> life.
>
>

>

>>
>>

>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>> and she's keen on marketing, i dont
>>>> fault diana for that, i faul you for assuming it was none other than
>>>> P.R,

>>>
>>> With Yoko and John? If that's what you mean, I don't. I highly respect
>>> both of
>>> them. And, yes, they were much more philosophically sophisticated and
>>> enlightened than Diana. If that's what you mean, I couldn't agree more.
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>> the others like hilton and yoko are transparent about it, but some of
>>>> you
>>>> think that the princess walked with a halo...

>>>
>>> Americans? Yes, I suppose that's true. But I think she was the first
>>> member of
>>> royalty that affected us that way. I mean, the Queen or Prince Charles
>>> would
>>> blow through town every now and then, and everyone would go ga ga. But
>>> they were
>>> just the flavor of the moment. All the hubub died down as soon as they
>>> were
>>> gone. It was different with Diana, though. Americans were smitten with
>>> her
>>> even
>>> when she wasn't around.
>>>

>>
>> true
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>> tif you read yur own writings
>>>> you would jump to the same conclusion...

>>>
>>> Duely noted. I see your point.
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>> i only wanted to piont out that she
>>>> didn't do it for them but her, get it right...

>>>
>>> I will agree that self-promotion was one of her motives. But I also
>>> think
>>> she
>>> was fairly kind-hearted by nature and personality. For example, that
>>> American
>>> couple who she baby sat for said she was wonderful with their children
>>> and
>>> they
>>> loved her. That doesn't make her a saint, of course. Just a caring baby
>>> sitter.
>>>

>>
>> word
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>> dont slap her with the marter
>>>> sticker

>>>
>>> No. I don't think of her as a martyr. But I do think of her as a
>>> positive
>>> force
>>> in the world while she was alive, a positive voice in regard to certain
>>> issues.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> i'm with you
>>

>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> I think a more accurate comparison would be
>>>>>>>> Paris Hilton.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ooooo, I can't believe you said that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There were parallels, of course. But Paris is virutally *only*
>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>> self-promotion.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> and walking around india with diamonds saying we should touch
>>>>>> lepers
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> fucken real

>>>>>
>>>>> I think it was real. I think it reflected the compassionate side of
>>>>> her
>>>>> personality.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> ok, i'm going to show up at the local soup kitchen in my ecalade with
>>>> spinners "cause there spinnin Ni&&a there Spinnin" blinged out, and
>>>> press
>>>> all around looking like p-diddi at the source awards. ist that for the
>>>> poor,
>>>> or was that for me?
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> At least Diana sometimes worked for good causes. And I think she
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> effective at it.
>>>>>>> There's no way Paris Hilton could focus attention on social
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> degree that
>>>>>>> Diana did.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> i have more respect for paris

>>>>>
>>>>> I have no respect for Paris.
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> i'd spend a night in paris

>>>
>>> She's good looking, but I don't think she has much inner sex appeal. I
>>> come from
>>> an entrirely different generation, though.
>>>

>>
>> actually i find her fugly but the video speaks for its self... she is
>> good
>> for something,
>>

>>>
>>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>> cause 1) she, also does as se believes, she
>>>>>> believes in nothing so thats what she does, 2) that cockeyed proda
>>>>>> priss
>>>>>> knows her place 3) she sucks a mean diznik

>>>>
>>>> what nothin?
>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one would take her seriously. I'll give Paris Hilton cretdit for
>>>>>> that

>>>>>>> much PR savvy, anyway. She knows people would take a cynical view
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> her
>>>>>>> motives if
>>>>>>> she did that. She's no dummy. I don't have much respect for her,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> she's
>>>>>>> got a
>>>>>>> pretty keen PR sense, at least, in relation to what she wants to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>> of it. She
>>>>>>> knows how to get what she wants.
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>> thats what makes her real, she bought her own DVD on Mtv thats
>>>>>> right

>>>>>
>>>>> Who cares if someone is "real" if they are also superficial and
>>>>> shallow?

>>>>
>>>> so who cares about diana,... cause she played one on TV...

>>>
>>> lol
>>>

>>
>> LOL, yah that one came to me from richard pryor inspiration
>>

>>>

>>>> oohh, boom bap
>>>> suprise oooh!!! look down, dont step on it, i think its your face, you
>>>> might
>>>> want to pick it up... foesheeze

>>>
>>> I don't think she was a superficial and shallow as Paris.
>>>

>>
>> i agree, but it was a slap fight and i sometime use my nails LoL
>>

>>>
>>>

>>
>> this was fun
>> --
>> So Have a Coke and a Smile and Shut the Fuck Up
>> --
>>
>> Quee
>>

>>>>
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pj

>>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>

>