On Dec 23, 12:54 pm, fanghorn wrote:

On Dec 21, 8:15 pm, JudithSco...@webtv.net (Judy Scobee) wrote:

They are not only pateints. They are victims of fraud drug companies
used as guinea pigs.

Remmber that the war was started bt Nixon and his pack of Veitnam war
pussies.

My Republicunnies Hurt.

On Dec 21, 3:49 pm, BudBurner hotmail.com> wrote:

On Dec 21, 10:08 am, Damaeus wrote:

It is more likely Obama will use the illusion Clinton used with Biden.
Act cool contract from hell byproxy.

Most drug addicts that I have met are real stupid deluded and
celebrate the rape of a little girl named Mary Christmas. Obama is a
recovering drug addict. The AA NA cult is deeply embedded in the
bowels of America. All DUI drug cases are deprived of driver licenses
unless they support the 12 steps cults. This is huge money making tax
free assets controlled by the medical mafia.

High All, hoping your Christmas was fantastic, and that you all have a
safe and Happy New Years. We spent Christmas with our grown children
and our 2 wonderful grandsons, 8 & 11 yrs old. They are such fun, and
we're sure this is the last year for the 11 yrs old to believe in
Santa.
They were a riot with remote control cars from their Uncle and kept
saying how wicked fast the cars were, and they were amazingly fast.
New Years we will probably go out to eat fairly early, then GET OFF
THE ROADS. After all it is what the AAers call Amateur Night. No need
to be out there with all the drunks. And we can always crawl to bed
if necessary........ Olde Hippee

where i live:

some people are able to purchase black market tobacco. here it is informally
referred to as 'chop chop';

however, where my dad lives (a particularly remote town)
it is referred to as 'shot dog' tobacco. the reason for this is thus: person
'x' who lives out there once received a batch of chop chop in the mail;
customs must have seen it on the x-ray or some shit like that and assumed it
as marijuana;

they LET the letter go through, then they staked out this guys house,
right... waiting for him to open his mail...
and when he finally did, probably dressed in a gown and slippers or
whatever, and the cops pounced on him...
and all he was doing was retrieving a bit of untaxed tobacco;

his loyal companion (his dog) saw this happening to his owner and pounced on
THEM, so
they shot the poor thing right between the eyes!

just a quick story on "shot dog" tobacco...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

vinny@work wrote in alt.buzzard.rules on December 17, 2008 03:08 in
Message-ID: solani.org>:

[snip]

That doesn't pose a problem. Remember, the public key is needed to /verify/
the signature, while the private key is required to /make/ the signature.
A PGP public key can be posted to a keyserver, and one can include an URL
where the key can be downloaded from. I do this all the time in my .sig
block:

PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1E92C0E8
PGP Key Fingerprint: 40E4 E9BB D084 22D5 3DE9 66B8 08E3 638C 1E92 C0E8

Nonsense. The entire point behind digital signatures is to make it extremely
difficult, if not impossible to alter a document with an attached signature.
If even a single /bit/ in a signed message changes, the signature will show
as invalid.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

pj wrote in alt.buzzard.rules on December 16, 2008 16:08 in Message-ID:
4ax.com>:

[snip]

Precisely. That is what I've been doing for over a dozen years now.

Well, that's a given--it is believed by many that the algorithms employed
are secure against virtually all comers.

Let UA show you how. We cover ALL protocols.

Receive and send emails with complete Anonymity.
Read and post to newsgroups.
Web based chat rooms and bulletin boards.

Everything youll need to take control of your online
and real life p.r.i.v.a.c.y

http://www.privacy-center.vze.com

Emma Dee

hhh
we

ew

w
e
e






8hwnta8rsfsw3vhmnmp7bg1a0kmoj1b6uikyilurgp88

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

pj wrote in alt.buzzard.rules on December 16, 2008 15:51 in Message-ID:
4ax.com>:

[snip]

So what? The main thing is that you've established a way for people to
verify with certainty that a post was authored by you. If they don't want
to avail themselves of this, it's /their/ problem. By signing your posts,
you have made it possible to prove that /you/ authored them as opposed to
someone else.

I disagree. You have to be consistent--I sign *all* my posts, and if anyone
tries to forge a post purporting to come from me, it's a dead giveaway that
it's a forgery if it's _not_ signed.