On Feb 3, 10:35 pm, jack sprat nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:02:07 -0600, Mike Ross
>
>
>
>
>
> REMOVEcomcast.net> wrote:
>>Due to the summer heat in my attic, I tried to initiate flowering by
> having
>>the lights on 11 hrs at night, and off 13 hrs during the day, hoping
> to
>>keep the peak temperatures down.
>
>>4 weeks of this lead to absolutely no flowering! They didn't even
> begin
>>flowering until 2 weeks after they went to the big bed, which is on
> 12 hrs
>>during the day. Messed up my schedule big time.
>
>>The next batch was flowered with a normal day cycle, and flowered
> well at 2
>>weeks, so I'm lead to believe that light and heat periods should be
>>aligned, or that heat during the dark period prevents the flowering
>>hormones from developing. So make sure the cool period comes at
> night.
>
>>-mikey
>
> I also use a night time lighting scheme to prevent overheating in the
> summer and underheating in the winter. It gets up to 100 in my
> location in the summer. I've flowered s few plants in the last 32
> years, and I've only seen two things prevent plowering. Once the timer
> broke, and the lights were on 24 hours: the other time, I had the
> system on 6 hours on - six hours off to test if it was the length of
> the dark time, or the total of the dark hours, that cause flowering.
> Point being, as I discovered after doing that, the only thing that
> prevents flowering is not enough continuous dark time. Heat won't
> prevent flowering unless it kills your plants. I'd suggest either your
> timer was busted, or you had a large light leak, maybe for only a few
> minutes a day, but big enough to do the job. If the dark period is cut
> in two by a period of light, that is enough to stop flowering
> completely.
>
> As the other poster mentioned, moonlight levels aren't enough. But a
> daytime sunshine leak in the roof that hit your light shielding in
> just the right place to penetrate through a crack, that would do it.
Thanks for the observations.
Your position closely aligns with mine. I have never seen it either,
but I have heard of other suggestions that heat interferes. If nothing
else, high temps would - as a product of normal chemistry - increase
the rate at which our light sensitive hormone is destroyed. So it
might lower the threshold. If the strain is light picky, well. Seems
plausible to help reconcile the differences.
Love and Light