> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:12:17 -0700, Cl...@Knicklas.com
> wrote:
>
>
>

>>On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:42:51 -0600, Topaz
>>hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>>>    The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
>>>nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
>>>world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
>>>It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
>>>the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
>>>people in India.

>

>>>    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
>>>intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
>>>important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
>>>the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
>>>are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:

>

>>>     "One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
>>>was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
>>>D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
>>>opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
>>>children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
>>>an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
>>>prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
>>>to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
>>>defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
>>>almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
>>>supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
>>>within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
>>>mostly environmental.

>

>>>   The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
>>>well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
>>>age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
>>>including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
>>>and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
>>>exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
>>>to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
>>>above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
>>>scored above the Blacks. (88)

>

>>>   A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
>>>follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
>>>measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
>>>average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
>>>of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
>>>children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
>>>Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
>>>and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
>>>half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
>>>adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)

>

>>>  RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY

>

>>>                                                                IQ

>

>>>        Parental IQ                                       115.35    
>>>        Biological Children                            109.4
>>>       White Adopted children                     105.6
>>>        Mulatto parents adopted children       98.5
>>>        Black parents adopted children            89.4

>

>>>     Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
>>>follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
>>>as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
>>>reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
>>>dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
>>>paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
>>>Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
>>>re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
>>>dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
>>>(91)"

>

>>>(88)  Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
>>>Children Adopted By  White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
>>>p.26-739

>

>>>(89)  Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
>>>Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
>>>Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
>>>p.17-135

>

>>>(90)  Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
>>>Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27

>

>>>(91)  Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
>>>Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20

>

>>>http://www.nationalvanguard.org     http://www.natvan.com

>

>>>http://www.thebirdman.org   http://www.ihr.org/

>

>>>http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html   http://www.nsm88.com/- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -