On Feb 7, 9:40 am, 3941 Dead
finestplanet.com> wrote:> Well, you'll just have to sue me, Knickers. And hope, of course, that
> the story Carlson wrote in the week or so after Steve's odd death
> doesn't emerge.
There is no "story Carlson wrote in the week or so after", Porky. You
made it up. It's a lie you made up to support your smear. I've
challenged you multiple times to produce this story and you can't do
it.
Care to prove me wrong by producing this mysterious "story" or will
you run away from the challenge once again?
I'm betting the later.
---
Wow, Billy Beck always did have you pegged *exactly*!
> Of course, getting a jury to sympathize with you when you do celebrate
> his death in front of his friends each year isn't gonna be real easy,
> Knickers.
In this case, the 'jury' includes your "target audience", Porky. I
wonder what *they* think of your lies and dissembling.
Furthermore, if you can produce anything I've written that
*celebrates* the death of Usenet leftwing hypocrite Steve Kangas you
are invited to reproduce it. Once again, you're a liar.
Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:01:22 -0800 (PST), Kurt Nicklas
>
>
>
>
>
>
bellsouth.net> wrote:>>On Januray 14, 2007, Bryan "Zepp" Jamieson posted an article to these
>>groups entitled "Rotterdamerueng"(sic). In the main, this "essay"
>>differed
>>very little from Bryan's usual collection of lies, lame invective and
>>canards but it did include the following paragraph which - even with
>>the name misspelling - caught my eye:
>
>>"We in the Lying Socialist Weasels (Steve was a member) also learned
>>another important lesson: television media personages were no longer
>>journalists. A week after Steve's death, a smarmy little creature
>>named Tucker Carlson decided to write a story about the emotionally
>>troubled would-be assassin of Richard Scaife. Or so Carlson had
>>decided Steve should be portrayed. Of the hundreds of friends and
>>foes
>>on Usenet Carlson could have asked for information, he chose exactly
>>one: a noisome Usenet denizen, a Free Republic habitue who routinely
>>liked to mine the internet for personal information on liberal
>>posters
>>with an eye to intimidating them. That user, one Kirk Nicklas, posts
>>a
>>celebration of Steve's death each year, just because he enjoys
>>hurting
>>people. That was the only person that Tucker Carlson found to be
>>worth
>>discussing Steve's death with. It taught us that the stuffed shirts
>>on
>>cable news were more interested in promoting diseased propaganda then
>>they were in getting news stories."
>
>>I've reprinted the story from Carlson in a separate thread entitled
>>"Stalking Scaife". The article makes no mention of me 'Kurt', 'Kirk'
>>or otherwise. Why did Bryan lie about the article? I've challenged him
>>repeatedly to produce
>>any piece where Carlson claims to have interviewed me. Each challenge
>>is met
>>with silence.
>
>>On, the other hand, the following is the one and only article
>>regarding the suicide of Steve Kangas for which I WAS interviewed. I
>>leave it to the reader to decide if I was 'celebrating' Kangas' death
>>as Bryan alleges. What will be obvious is that most of those
>>interviewed for the piece *are* friends of Kangas.
>
>>Perhaps "Zepp" is simply miffed that no one from Salon interviewed
>>*him* for the piece. Until he breaks his silence about this subject,
>>we'll never know....
>
