Well, you'll just have to sue me, Knickers. And hope, of course, that
the story Carlson wrote in the week or so after Steve's odd death
doesn't emerge.
Of course, getting a jury to sympathize with you when you do celebrate
his death in front of his friends each year isn't gonna be real easy,
Knickers.
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:01:22 -0800 (PST), Kurt Nicklas
bellsouth.net> wrote:
>On Januray 14, 2007, Bryan "Zepp" Jamieson posted an article to these
>groups entitled "Rotterdamerueng"(sic). In the main, this "essay"
>differed
>very little from Bryan's usual collection of lies, lame invective and
>canards but it did include the following paragraph which - even with
>the name misspelling - caught my eye:
>
>"We in the Lying Socialist Weasels (Steve was a member) also learned
>another important lesson: television media personages were no longer
>journalists. A week after Steve's death, a smarmy little creature
>named Tucker Carlson decided to write a story about the emotionally
>troubled would-be assassin of Richard Scaife. Or so Carlson had
>decided Steve should be portrayed. Of the hundreds of friends and
>foes
>on Usenet Carlson could have asked for information, he chose exactly
>one: a noisome Usenet denizen, a Free Republic habitue who routinely
>liked to mine the internet for personal information on liberal
>posters
>with an eye to intimidating them. That user, one Kirk Nicklas, posts
>a
>celebration of Steve's death each year, just because he enjoys
>hurting
>people. That was the only person that Tucker Carlson found to be
>worth
>discussing Steve's death with. It taught us that the stuffed shirts
>on
>cable news were more interested in promoting diseased propaganda then
>they were in getting news stories."
>
>I've reprinted the story from Carlson in a separate thread entitled
>"Stalking Scaife". The article makes no mention of me 'Kurt', 'Kirk'
>or otherwise. Why did Bryan lie about the article? I've challenged him
>repeatedly to produce
>any piece where Carlson claims to have interviewed me. Each challenge
>is met
>with silence.
>
>On, the other hand, the following is the one and only article
>regarding the suicide of Steve Kangas for which I WAS interviewed. I
>leave it to the reader to decide if I was 'celebrating' Kangas' death
>as Bryan alleges. What will be obvious is that most of those
>interviewed for the piece *are* friends of Kangas.
>
>Perhaps "Zepp" is simply miffed that no one from Salon interviewed
>*him* for the piece. Until he breaks his silence about this subject,
>we'll never know....
>
>A VINCENT FOSTER FOR USENET LIBERALS?
>
http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1999/03/19feature.html
>
>
--
What do you call a Republican with a conscience?
An ex-Republican.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)
"I simply can not believe this is what the Republican party has
become. I just canÂ’t. It just makes me sick to think all those years
of supporting this party, and this is what it has become. Even if you
donÂ’t like the S-Chip expansion, it is hard to deny what Republicans
are- a bunch of bitter, nasty, petty, snarling, sneering, vicious
thugs, peering through peopleÂ’s windows so they can make fun of their
misfortune.
IÂ’m registering Independent tomorrow."
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscribe@
yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscribe@
yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
