On Feb 24, 5:04Â pm, Nick...@
Click.com wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:07:27 -0800 (PST), RCMAN
>
>
excite.com> wrote:>>On Feb 24, 12:27Â pm, Nick...@
Click.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:46:59 -0500, "SilverBullet"
>
>>>>Being a clinton spittoon boy must be a permanent position that covers the
>>>>entire clinton crime family.
>
>>> name any crime committed by the clintons that passed a
>>> laugh test, shitbag.
>
>>Ask Judge Wright, loser.
>
> Judge Wright found no crime clinton committed, stupid
Judge Wright found him in contempt.
He had his law license suspended in Arkansas and the USSC.
I think Judge Wright would laugh at your ignorance, Rosy, just like
they did back in ole Lead High School and in the USW union, right?
> What Wright did, was to be forced to rule that the
> Jones definition, by default, was legal----and that
> when clinton did not "re-win" the civil action----she
> was forced to "fine" him
There you go again, you stupid moron. The finding of contempt
was after the case was over. Your comment shows just how totally
ignorant you are about this. Do you sit in your government-provided
housing
day after day and think of this nonsense? Sheesh.
> Better that than the millions to "rewin"'
A finding of contempt has nothing to do with "rewinning" anything, you
pathetic
pinhead, McRosy, and it has nothing to do with "millions". It has to
do with
lying under oath before a judge and being outed for it.
> Thanks for letting me best you again, RCLOON
Easy for you to say. Too bad you never do it. I get the best of you
everytime
but you're too stooooopid to realize it.
> You haven't the personal courage, Â nor the intellectual
> honesty to compete.
It takes neither to prove you to be the pathetic loser I've always
said
you were.
> SNICKER
>
>>By the way, did you know you're a laughingstock even among the
>>weasels?
>
> And they "talk" by doing what that YOU can hear?
Wouldn't just LOVE to know?
SNICKER
