Jason Miller: 'Why do we hate them?'

Fear and Loathing in the Occident

Jason Miller

Islamophobia is a mental and spiritual affliction. And our Western ruling
elites bear the responsibility for inflicting it upon the psyches of the
masses.

Now that the Stalinist/Maoist regimes have collapsed or evolved toward
capitalism and no fascist states with imperial ambitions exist (besides the
United States and its few allies), the American Empire needed to find a new
"enemy" to replace Stalinists and Nazis. Much of the soft power employed by
the leaders of America's "top down democracy" stems from psychological
manipulation of "the mob". Mobilization of the masses against a common enemy
"threatening the very existence of the American Way" has long been a staple
in the United States' ruling elites' ongoing push to monopolize the world's
wealth, power, and prestige.

And who better to vilify than Islamic people? Many are dark-skinned and live
in developing nations, meaning their lives are inconsequential in the
prevailing moral calculus of the West. The Middle East is predominately
Islamic, its sands are oozing with crude oil, and it is home to Israel. From
the perspective of the Empire, what better region to target than the Middle
East?

And whether one believes that 9/11 was a false flag operation perpetrated by
the US government or the work of radical Islamic Fundamentalists, the
members of the Bush Regime obviously shed their crocodile tears publicly
while privately celebrating the event as their Pearl Harbor. 3,000 civilian
deaths and the demolition of a powerful symbol of the Western "value" of
avaricious Capitalism whipped the American public into a furor against the
"evil Muslims" who "hate our freedoms".

Never mind the fact that the United States and Israel have undertaken a
nearly unparalleled program of military aggression and ethnic cleansing
throughout the Middle East since the formation of the illegitimate colonial
nation in Palestine. Given the premises for founding Israel, someone needs
to remind Great Britain and the United States that it is incumbent upon them
to create a homeland for homosexuals and Romani people. After all, they were
also Holocaust victims and are people without a nation. And like the
Palestinians, the other inhabitants of the Middle East are more akin to
animals than human beings. So why not establish two more colonies on their
land?

On August 13, Sixty Minutes aired a segment that revealed a great deal about
Islamophobia and the role the corporate media plays in its proliferation.

In his recent open letter to Mike Wallace, Michael K. Smith declared:
Your interview with Iranian Prime Minister Ahmadinejad was a disgrace to
the journalistic profession. You began with the condescending manner of a
school principal lecturing the class clown for immature behavior and
squandered the entire interview on hypocritically accusatory questions. If
gall were an Olympic sport, you'd take the Gold Medal.
Michael made some fine points throughout his letter. However, I opine that
he was too generous when he called Wallace's vituperative verbal assault an
interview. What I witnessed was Mike Wallace, the Ugly American. Brimming
with contempt, impatience, hubris, and belligerence, he more closely
resembled the Grand Inquisitor than a journalist.

Did Wallace truly fail to grasp that he was acting as an apologist and
cheerleader for bellicose, heartless, and ruthless perpetrators of war
crimes on behalf of Israel, and thus is a Zionist (as Ahmadinejad
suggested)? Through its grossly biased coverage of the "War on Terrorism"
and mindless perpetuation of the inane myth that Israel has the right to
annihilate an unlimited number of civilians to protect its "right to exist",
CBS News has joined the squad of corporate media cheerleaders which has been
shamelessly complicit in the Empire's egregious crimes against humanity. I
submit that one can be a Zionist and a journalist. Mike Wallace is living
proof.

Yet in spite of Wallace's tenacious efforts, the "devil incarnate",
Ahmadinejad, remained composed. At times Ahmadinejad seemed to thoroughly
enjoy Wallace's obvious "flustration" in attacking him from what has become
an absurdly untenable position, both morally and logically. For those of us
who don't believe the Western media fairy tale that the United States is a
force for good engaged in a noble struggle in its bid to rid the world of
the evil of Islam and defend Israel's "right to exist", Wallace's ill-fated
attempt to expose the malevolence of the "enemy" was quite entertaining.

Just as Wallace scrambled madly in a hopeless attempt to prevail
intellectually in his interrogation of Ahmadinejad, the debt-ridden, aging
American Empire and its allies are flailing wildly in a desperate attempt to
claim military victory in the Middle East. And like Ahmadinejad, those who
comprise the resistance to occupation and exploitation in the Middle East
are facing down their occupiers with a deft persistence, filled with a
confidence born from the knowledge that recent history has not been kind to
imperial invaders facing a people determined to expel them (i.e. Vietnam,
Lebanon, and Iraq).

In the perverse worldview of the Neocons, Israel, and AIPAC, Iran is
considered to be a part of the "Axis of Evil". Since Wallace championed the
cause of the "benevolent" United States in his Sixty Minutes interrogation
of the leader of one of the members of the "Axis", it is instructive to
consider the "evils" Iran and resistance groups like Hamas and Hezbollah
have perpetrated.

While various resistance groups in the Middle East have certainly committed
war crimes by killing civilians, the "leader of the free world" and its
counterpart in Palestine have annihilated hundreds of thousands more
civilians than have the so-called "terrorists".

Yes, militant Fundamentalist Islamic individuals wield much of the power in
Iran. But let's put on our thinking caps to discern how that situation
evolved. In 1979 hard-line anti-American Islamic clerics assumed control of
the Iranian government when they ousted the Shah (the corrupt US puppet who
tortured and killed tens of thousands of Iranian "dissidents" during his
reign of terror). Ironically, the Iranian government the United States loves
to hate exists because the CIA and MI6 facilitated the Shah taking power
from Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. The significance? Mossadegh was a
democratically-elected secular prime minister who had had the audacity to
nationalize the oil industry because the British oil companies were grossly
exploiting the Iranian people. By acting in typical fashion (by taking out a
populist leader and replacing him with a vicious tyrant), the United States
provided an incubator for powerful anti-American sentiment. Thus the United
States and Great Britain are responsible for the theocracy in Iran which
they fear and despise.

Corporate media pundits like Michelle Malkin and Anne Coulter are the
vanguards in spreading pernicious distortions which fan the rapidly
spreading emotional flames of fear, prejudice, and hatred comprising
Islamophobia. Two of the most disturbing and inflammatory perversions of the
truth the Western media entities disseminate are that all adherents of the
Islamic faith are radical fundamentalists and that Sharia Law is universally
harsh and grossly inferior to the Empire's system (which provides "liberty
and justice for all").

Just as Christianity encompasses a broad spectrum of people with varying
ways of practicing and expressing their faith, the Islamic world is filled
with human beings who have diverse ways of expressing their religious
beliefs. There are liberal, moderate, and Fundamentalist Muslims. And
surprising as it may seem, most practitioners of Fundamentalist Islam, like
most Fundamentalist Christians, are essentially peaceful individuals. In
fact, a Muslim truly following the tenets of Islam practices moderation and
tolerance. Many Muslims are no more willing to strap plastic explosives to
their belts for a suicide mission than most Christians would be to bomb an
abortion clinic. There are radicals from both religions, but they are very
much in the minority.

Another lie deeply embedded in the barrage of communications we receive from
the Western corporate media is that the United States and its allies are
morally superior to the "evil Muslims". One aspect of Islam they offer as
"proof" of this faulty conclusion is that many Islamic nations incorporate
Sharia into their legal systems. While Sharia can involve harsh and rigid
forms of justice, it exists to varying degrees in the many Muslim nations
around the globe. Judiciaries in Islamic nations manifest the influence of
Sharia in ways that span the spectrum from extremely dogmatic to highly
secular and liberal.

While the Western media's blistering criticism of the more draconian actions
of some Islamic nations (i.e. Iran's execution of teenagers) is definitely
warranted, the Empire has a great deal of house-cleaning to do before it is
in a position to preach to other nations on human rights issues.

Here are but a few recent examples of the United States' own flagrant human
rights abuses:

1. carrying out quite a number of its own executions in a manner recently
discovered to inflict a great deal of suffering on the victim

2. routinely torturing and suspending justice for suspected "enemy
combatants"

3. funding the Israeli Apartheid and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians

4. occupying a nation where it has killed over a million Iraqi civilians
since the Gulf War invasion (through brutal economic sanctions and military
actions).

5. funding the Israeli devastation of Lebanon

6. supporting numerous ruthless and murderous regimes (as long as they are
friendly to US corporations)

7. having cynically embraced Saddam Hussein as an ally (knowing of his
crimes against humanity) when it furthered US interests and invading Iraq
preemptively to topple him when he ceased to be useful.

8. having kept the House of Saud in power for years despite its harsh
practice of Sharia (i.e. thieves' hands are severed and adulterers are
stoned).

9. maintaining the largest prison population in the world through a legal
system so unjust that 50%% of those incarcerated are Black when Blacks
comprise 14%% of the general population.

10. engaging in numerous outright massacres of civilians (i.e. Haditha,
Fallujah)

In light of the above, how long will it be before a significant portion of
the Muslim population falls prey to an extreme prejudice against all
Westerners called Anglo-Christophobia? Let's hope it does not happen any
time soon.

Speaking of Christians (at least the Fundamentalist ones), their
demonization of Islam is actually rather amusing. Christian Fundamentalists
share more common ground with the extreme members of the Islamic faith than
they perhaps realize. Some Muslim nations treat homosexuality as a crime.
Abortion is illegal in virtually every circumstance throughout much of the
Middle East. Separation of church and state does not exist in nations like
Iran. Implementation of the death penalty is common in the Middle East. How
can men like John Hagee reconcile their cognitive dissonance in advocating
war against Iran, a model of the theocracy they strive to implement in the
United States?

CBS, Mike Wallace and the rest of the United States' corporate media can
continue to do the Empire's bidding from now until the world comes to an end
(which may not be as far away as I make it sound if sanity and humanity do
not prevail over greed, ignorance, and hatred). However, their nearly
endless bombardment of intelligently crafted lies readily distributed to
nearly every corner of the globe are powerless to alter the truth.

In truth, Israeli and American lives are no more precious than those of the
Arab and Persian human beings populating the Middle East. And neither the
United States/Israel/Great Britain nor the nations and groups comprising the
resistance in the Middle East are innocent of the deep transgression of
murdering innocents. Each nation or group also commits human rights abuses
against its own people in some fashion. However, Western exploiters and
invaders are culpable of far more frequent and grievous war crimes than the
Middle Easterners who are defending themselves, their resources, and their
people.

If the majority of the human beings controlling the corporate media had a
shred of moral decency they would focus their efforts on informing their
viewers, listeners, and readers of the vast number of war crimes committed
by Israel and the United States. They would start portraying the
"terrorists" as the resistors of oppression they truly are. They would make
a distinction between the various Middle Eastern resistance groups'
legitimate attacks on their occupiers' militaries and the war crimes they
commit against civilians. And they would devote most of their remaining
substantial resources to the inundation of news consumers with stories,
photos and video footage depicting the tragic and gruesome civilian
suffering and death.

As it is, the Western corporate media shamelessly serve the Neocons by
perpetuating a virtually endless cycle of hatred and violence. They incite
and feed Islamophobia and they fabricate a plethora of false justifications
for the malevolent actions of Israel and the United States. But then in a
fascist nation, corporations are wedded with the state, militarism is the
state's primary focus, scapegoats and enemies are essential, and the
function of the Fourth Estate is to provide the propaganda to control the
masses.

Just imagine if the mainstream media in the United States actually began
fulfilling its role (in what is ostensibly a free society) and acted as a
check on our government rather than its accomplice. If more Americans knew
more truth, instead of hating Islamic people and pushing to intensify the
war in the Middle East, the masses would be demanding that reason, justice,
and peace prevail. They would demand that the United States completely
withdraw its military from the Middle East and leave Israel to stand on its
own, which would force the Israelis to finally settle the Palestinian issue
in a just manner and to cooperate with their neighbors as equals.

If the major media entities of the West were living up to their
responsibilities as members of the Fourth Estate, perhaps 3 year old Ali
Ahmad Hashim of Qana would not have been bombed to death, the members of the
Ghalia family would not have been obliterated on a Gaza beach, 76 year old
wheel-chair bound amputee Abdul Hamid Hassan Ali would not have been
massacred at Haditha, Cindy Sheehan would not be grieving for a son lost to
a war of imperial aggression, and Reuven Levy of Haifa would not have been
annihilated by a rocket attack as he was doing his job for Israel Railways.

I am not holding my breath waiting for money-driven enablers of war like
Rupert Murdoch to start heeding the advice of Jiminy Cricket. However, I
will not succumb to their assault of malicious distortions. I refuse to
fear, hate, or consider myself at war with 20%% of the world's population
simply because they choose to follow the teachings of the Qur'an.

Islamophobia is an intellectual and spiritual malignancy. Reason and
humanity are the cures.

Jason Miller is a 39 year old sociopolitical essayist with a degree in
liberal arts and an extensive self-education (derived from an insatiable
appetite for reading). He welcomes responses at willpowerful@hotmail.com or
comments on his blog, Thomas Paine's Corner, at
http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/.

--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson