Snobocracy: When "The Right People" Run Washington

By Ernest Partridge
Created Dec 30 2006 - 9:55am

"This beautiful capital is often a place of intrigue and calculation.
Powerful people maneuver for position and worry endlessly about who is in
and who is out, who is up and who is down, forgetting those people whose
toil and sweat sends us here and pays our way."
-- President Bill Clinton, First Inaugural Address

Two days before the August 8 Connecticut primary, Corinne Boggs "Cokie"
Roberts reflected on ABC's "This Week" that it would be "a disaster for the
Democratic Party" if Joseph Lieberman were to lose that primary election to
Ned Lamont. "I think", she said, " that ... pushing the party to the left,
which is what's likely to happen, is pushing the party to the position from
which it traditionally loses ... presidential elections."

I suspect that Ms. Roberts was less concerned about the future of the
Democratic Party than she was about the seating arrangement at Steve and
Cokie Roberts' New Years Eve gala. After all, Joe and Hadassah are such fine
folks, and DC High Society simply would not be the same without them.

And so, perhaps because Ned Lamont and the voters in the Connecticut
Democratic primary could not be allowed to upset the proper order of things
in Washington Society, Lamont's campaign was abandoned by the Democratic
"centrists," and, with the indispensable support of a majority of
Connecticut republican voters, Lieberman kept his seat.

Read closely both on and between the lines of Washington (so-called)
"journalism," and you will find evidence of an unelected
"shadow-government"of comfortable, self-appointed and self-satisfied DC
elites, composed of lobbyists, pundits, publishers, diplomats, military,
and, of course, politicians. This is the Washington "snobocracy." It
decides, through its "establishment" media, what news, information and
opinion are worthy of the public's attention. And it determines if a
politician's life in the nation's Capital will be comfortable and productive
or an unremitting misery, as Bill and Hillary Clinton were to discover.

The snobocrats share a bond of community that is unperturbed by such mundane
concerns as partisanship. This non-partisan conviviality is typified by the
ownership of a Washington steakhouse, "The Caucus Room," which opened in
August, 2000:

Thomas H. Boggs Jr., a prominent lobbyist [and brother of Cokie Roberts],
and Haley Barbour, former chairman of the Republican National Committee and
now in the lobbying business, hold the largest shares, $150,000 each. Ted
Leonsis, a top executive at America Online, and Jon Ledecky, another
Internet entrepreneur, are also investors.

[The owners are] a bipartisan bunch: Terry McAuliffe, President Clinton's
top fund-raiser; C. Boyden Gray, a former counsel to President Bush and now
with the law firm Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering; Thomas Downey, a former
Democratic congressman and now a lobbyist; Richard Burt, the former
ambassador to Germany; and Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster. (Marian
Burros, New York Times, August 30, 2000).

These "beltway insiders," as DC High Society chronicler Sally Quinn calls
them, "have a proprietary interest in Washington and identify with it" - it
is their "town." "We have our own set of village rules," says
advisor-to-any-President, David Gergen, "there's a small-town quality here."
(Quinn [1]).

The snobocracy is typified by veteran pundit, David Broder. As David Sirota
observes: [2]

In David Broder's world, those hundreds of thousands of blue collar
workers who have been thrown out onto the street thanks to NAFTA ... are the
filth of the earth that high and mighty elite Washington journalists like
him cannot be bothered with. In David Broder's world, any request for our
trade pacts to include restrictions on child slavery, environmental
degradation, and pharmaceutical industry profiteering off desperately poor
people, [is] positively un-American. Why? Because David Broder lives in a
place where all of these critical issues are merely just more fodder and
gossip for a newspaper column - not real challenges in his life, nor in the
life of the people he spends his time with in the Washington Beltway.

Upon reading Broder, Quinn, Cokie Roberts, et al, one wonders if these
worthies might not be reluctant to venture far beyond the beltway, lest they
fall off the edge.

It was into this forbidding scene that Bill and Hillary Clinton arrived in
1993. As Eric Alterman observed, notwithstanding their law degrees from
Yale, and Bill Clinton's Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford, the snobocracy seemed
to regard the new President as "some Ozark hick who failed to pay proper
heed to their superior social grace and aristocratic breeding."

And Hillary stepped on to the scene on the decidedly wrong foot. Salon's
Harry Jaffe reports: [3]

According to society sources, Sally [Quinn] invited Hillary to a luncheon
when the Clintons came to town in 1993. Sally stocked her guest list with
her best buddies and prepared to usher the first lady into the capital's
social whirl. Apparently, Hillary didn't accept. Miffed, Sally wrote a catty
piece in the Post about Mrs. Clinton. Hillary made sure that Quinn rarely
made it into the White House dinners or social events.

In return, Sally started talking trash about Hillary to her buddies, and
her animus became a staple of the social scene. "There's just something
about her that pisses people off," Quinn is quoted as saying in a New Yorker
article about Hillary...

David Broder famously remarked to Sally Quinn, that Bill Clinton "came in
here and trashed the place, and it's not his place." It never seemed to
occur to Broder, Quinn, or the snobocrats, that Washington DC is not their
"place" either. It is, or at least was meant to be, the American people's
"place."

The Clinton's arrival in David Broder's "place" was followed by Whitewater,
Travelgate, Filegate, and Ken Starr and his $55 million search for a crime
to fit the punishment. No dice. And finally, at long last, paydirt: Monica!

Thanks to the 2006 election, the snobocracy may be losing its grip on
Washington. But it remains a significant player in our politics. For
despite the clear message from the voters that it is past time for
progressive reform and renewal, the snobocracy is pulling hard to the
center. Again, just read and watch the mainstream media. The Democrats,
inside and outside of Washington, must resist this pull persistently and
forcefully.

The best way for the American public and the newly-elected Democrats to deal
with the snobocracy is to ignore it. Attention and publicity are its
mother's milk. Without them, it will wither. The snobocracy's primary
outreach to the public, and thence its influence upon the Congress, is
through the DC punditry. Thankfully, because the pundits' commentaries have
been so spectacularly off-base during the past six years, the public appears
to be paying much less attention to them.

When in 1790, the U.S Congress passed legislation to establish a new capital
city, it selected an uninhabited tidal marsh on the estuary of the Potomac
River. It was hoped that a new city might leave behind the corruption of the
previous capitals, New York and Philadelphia.

Perhaps it's time to move again, leaving the snobocrats behind to party-on
to their hearts' content, but out of harm's way. Madison Wisconsin strikes
me as an ideal location. Or maybe another "from-scratch" city, this time
along the upper Mississippi River.

For unless the United States Government once again pays attention to the
scientists and acts decisively about the global climate crisis, it will have
to move in any case.

After all, the District of Columbia is located at sea level.

Copyright 2006, by Ernest Partridge
_______

About author Dr. Ernest Partridge is a consultant, writer and lecturer in
the field of Environmental Ethics and Public Policy. He has taught
Philosophy at the University of California, and in Utah, Colorado and
Wisconsin. He publishes the website, "The Online Gadfly"
(www.igc.org/gadfly) and co-edits the progressive website, "The Crisis
Papers" (www.crisispapers.org). His book in progress, "Conscience of a
Progressive," can be seen at www.igc.org/gadfly/progressive/^toc.htm [4].
Send comments to: crisispapers@hotmail.com [5].

--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson