Even Esquire Magazine Calls for a Democratic Senate

By Bob Geiger
Created Oct 16 2006 - 10:41am

I'm not sure how many of us pushing-50, liberal guys subscribe to both
Mother Jones [1] and Esquire [2] magazines, but I suspect it would be more
than people would think. And, for better or worse, I admit it: I've received
Esquire in my mailbox for a long time and look forward to its arrival each
month.

While I didn't care for the puff piece they did on John McCain in August and
don't think any woman under 30 should be deemed the "sexiest woman alive" --
as they just named the lovely, but callow, Scarlett Johansson [3] -- I'll
stick with any men's magazine that's as likely to include Sheryl Crow [4],
Kim Cattrall [5] and Sela Ward [6] in their "women we love" section, as they
are to laud Johansson and fellow 21-year-old, Keira Knightley [7].

So, what the hell does this have to do with the United States Senate?

Well, in addition to a nice cover photo of the fetching Ms. Johansson this
month, Esquire boldly announces up front that they will make a voting
recommendation in every House, Senate and Gubernatorial race contested this
year. Most encouraging to me, is that their Senate voting recommendations
would suggest a 52-48 Democratic majority when the 110th Congress convenes
in January.

Hey, after watching the craven, do-nothing 109th Congress run by the
Republican party, I'll take any sign of better things to come.

Most of the recommendations made by the urbane magazine's editors match my
picks [8] for who will win this year and some don't. They go way out on a
limb and recommend Democrat Dale Groutage in the Wyoming Senate race,
despite his standing no chance against Bush rubber-stamp Craig Thomas. (Of
Thomas, Esquire says "It would appear that he considers government good for
one thing: building weapons. Otherwise, he votes to slash and burn.")

They inexplicably recommend George W. Bush's Republican poodle, Mike DeWine,
over Democrat Sherrod Brown in Ohio but, other than that momentary error in
judgment, they make some sensible recommendations that we can only hope
their middle-aged, erudite demographic takes to heart.

All told, for the 33 seats up for grabs in 2006, they recommend that readers
vote for Democrats in 25 of those. In fact, the only Republicans getting the
nod from the 73-year-old publication are DeWine, Richard Lugar (Indiana),
Olympia Snowe (Maine), Trent Lott (Mississippi), John Ensign (Nevada),
Lincoln Chafee (Rhode Island), Kay Hutchison (Texas) and Orrin Hatch (Utah).

Here's some very interesting comments made by the magazine's editors in
specific races:

a.. Connecticut: In their endorsement of Democrat Ned Lamont [9], they
deal quite harshly with Joe Lieberman: "So the same Democratic primary
voters who rewarded you with their votes for 18 years are now mistaken when
they turn you out, giving you no choice but to run as an Independent?
Senator Lieberman, it is you who are mistaken. And your repeated assertion
that there should be no criticism of the president in a time of war is not
merely mistaken, it is un-American."
a.. Florida: Esquire recommends Democrat Bill Nelson and says of Katherine
Harris that she is "a twofer: a) a poster child for the ingratitude of the
Bush family (how quickly they forget) and b) a thorough nut."
a.. Maryland: "Paul Sarbanes is retiring. Both candidates to replace him
have decent bipartisan credentials, but [Michael] Steele's relatively thin
record can't compare with [Ben] Cardin's 20 good years in the House."
a.. Michigan: Esquire endorses Democrat Debbie Stabenow. "The GOP is
targeting this seat, charging incumbent Democrat Debbie Stabenow with
failing to pass legislation that would help the auto industry. Which isn't
actually true. But yeah, it's hard to protect your constituents when the
Republican Congress cynically stymies your every effort. Expect more of the
same if the Republican candidate, Mike Bouchard, gets elected."
a.. Minnesota: In recommending Democrat Amy Klobuchar, Esquire says of her
opponent, Mark Kennedy, that "Minnesota voters value independence and
forthrightness in their elected officials, and Kennedy, a Congressman, has
displayed neither, rubber-stamping most Bush policies until recently, and
now forgetting to mention he's a Republican."
a.. Missouri: The magazine recommends Claire McCaskill and lashes
incumbent Jim Talent. "Jim Talent, elected on a pro-Bush platform and one of
the administration's most faithful supporters, now takes great pains not to
mention the president on his campaign web site. But the stench of
weak-willed -- not to mention irresponsible -- obeisance still clings."
a.. Montana: Of the GOP's Conrad Burns, who they urge their readers to
vote against, Esquire says "Did Conrad Burns have any friends as a child?
From calling Arabs 'ragheads' to reportedly suggesting a flight attendant
become a stay-at-home mom to, in late August, branding all taxi drivers as
terrorists, his dominant trait is loutish insensitivity. Oh, and he's
closely tied to Jack Abramoff. Montanans have an opportunity to correct a
bad mistake."
a.. New Jersey: "Tom Kean Jr., son of the former New Jersey governor, is
relying on his name and cheap attacks in his run to replace incumbent [Bob]
Menendez. Unfortunately, his charge that Menendez was involved in a major
kickback scandal in the state in the early 1980s has proven not just
exaggerated, but blatantly untrue: Prosecutors from the case recall the
then-28-year-old Menendez as being extraordinarily courageous in fingering
both enemies and allies for their criminal activities."
In addition to strongly endorsing Democrat Jim Webb over Republican George
Felix "Macaca" Allen in Virginia -- calling Webb "eminently more qualified
than incumbent George Allen to comment on this year's hot topic, the Iraq
war" -- Esquire lists the people they call the "pillars" and the "worst" in
Congress right now.

Of those Senators running this year, they call Hillary Clinton "an excellent
Senator" and, of Republican Rick Santorum, the magazine says "For the love
of God, people, it's long past time that Rick Santorum did his man-on-dog,
dog-on-man ruminations on his own time."

They also call Wisconsin's Russ Feingold who, while not up for reelection
this year, may be running for president in 2008, "the kind of Democrat,
every Democrat should aspire to be."

And, before anyone writes to me telling me how meaningless Esquire
Magazine's political endorsements are, I already know that. But if a
publication targeted primarily toward middle-aged men is recommending such a
huge flip toward a Senate controlled by Democrats, I can't wait to read what
Mother Jones has to say.

--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson