Conservatives sift through ashes of Tuesday's overwhelming electoral defeat

By Bill Berkowitz
Created Nov 13 2006 - 8:30am

Christian evangelical leaders rally the troops for 'the biggest battle we
have faced for our core beliefs,' says Family Research Council's Tony
Perkins

In an election-eve email, the Reverend Donald Wildmon, the founder and
chairman of the American Family Association, urged his supporters to get out
and vote "for the sake of our children and grandchildren." The email
continued, "It is not merely control of Congress that will be decided ...
but also control of the federal courts who are assuming more and more
influence over the core values that you and I care about most."

Many who identify as Christian conservatives may have taken warnings from
Rev. Wildmon and other conservative Christian evangelical leaders to heart
and showed up at the polls. But this time around, in some races, religious
voters played an important role in electing Democratic candidates.

According to the New York Times, exit polling found that 24 percent (up from
23 percent in 2004) of the voters identified themselves as born-again
Christians. "And," the New York Times reported, "70 percent of those white
evangelical and born-again Christians voted for Republican Congressional
candidates nationally, also little changed from the 72 percent who voted for
such candidates in 2004."

There was a shift in Ohio, though, where Ted Strickland, a Methodist
Minister won the governor's race, and in Pennsylvania, where Bob Casey Jr.,
attracted Roman Catholics and mainline Protestants.

"It looks like the white evangelical base of the Republican Party pretty
much held firm," John Green, a senior fellow with the Pew Forum on Religion
and Public Life, told the Times. "The white evangelicals did show up, and
they did vote Republican."

"The biggest change appears to be in the states where the Democratic
candidates made a real effort to attract these religious voters," Mr. Green
said. "It seems to have paid off."

Sifting through the ashes

As conservative Christian evangelical leaders continue to sift through the
ashes of Tuesday's overwhelming electoral defeat, some are playing the blame
game, others are already in attack mode, and still others are planning for
the next battle. Some leaders are blaming Republican Party corruption for
the defeat, while others are again rallying their troops by continuing to
hammer away at the "Beware of Nancy Pelosi and her San Francisco values"
theme -- a theme that didn't resonate with voters -- as if voters preferred
that the atmosphere in Washington continued to be poisoned by partisan
politics.

"The Republicans didn't light our fire," said Tom Minnery, Focus on the
Family's vice president of government and public policy. "It took [Dr.
James] Dobson a long time before he decided to convince people to turn out."
Minnery said the decision by the group's political arm, Focus on the Family
Action, to back Republicans, "was not over how good the Republicans were,
but how bad the Democrats will be, and not just on the social issues but on
national security as well."

Echoing the pre-election theme of Richard Viguerie and other prominent
conservatives -- who before the election suggested that a defeat could be a
wake-up call that might drive the GOP back to its core values -- Dr. Tom
Coburn (R-OK), one of the Senate's most conservative members, wrote in a
post-election commentary posted at Focus in the Family's CitizenLink.com:
"Although this election represents a short-term setback for Republicans, it
could be an important turning point for the Republican Party."

In his commentary titled "We Need to Govern from Conscience," Sen. Coburn
wrote: "Many factors contributed to these election results. The American
people obviously are concerned about the conduct of the war in Iraq. Members
of both parties have an obligation to work together to offer creative and
constructive solutions that will help our troops accomplish their mission."

"The overriding theme of this election, however, is that voters are more
interested in changing the culture in Washington than changing course in
Washington, D.C. This election was not a rejection of conservative
principles per se, but a rejection of corrupt, complacent and incompetent
government."

In the November 8 edition of Tony Perkins' Washington Update, Perkins, the
head of the Family Research Council, the leading "family values" lobbying
group wrote: "As Pelosi prepares to lead the House, it will be painfully
obvious that the values of her hometown, San Francisco, are not the values
of Middle America. Make no mistake. The battle in which we are set to engage
will be the biggest one we have faced for our core beliefs. The assault
against abstinence, marriage, life, good judges, and cloning may be the
fiercest yet. As speaker, Rep. Pelosi and the old guard of extremists will
pounce on the opportunities that their new committee chairmanships will
afford them."

Responding to the unseating of Ohio's Senator Mike DeWine by Sherrod Brown,
Phil Burress, of the Citizens for Community Values Action Political Action
Committee (CCV Action PAC), said that DeWine's defeat was somewhat
understandable because, outside of being pro-life, he did not support many
key pro-family issues. However, there is no question that things will be
"quite a bit more serious with Sherrod Brown going up there for six years."

Burress pointed out that for decades Ohioans were represented by liberal
Democrats such as Howard Metzenbaum and John Glenn. Brown, said Buress, is
in the same vein as those two "ultra-liberal senators," and "it's really a
shame that we're going to have to go through this again."

Top-shelf conservatives go down to defeat

The election saw some of the GOP's most prominent conservative leaders go
down in flames: Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), one of the Senate's top GOP
leaders and a strong supporter of the Bush agenda, lost in his bid for
re-election to State Treasurer Bob Casey Jr.; another leader among Christian
conservatives, Missouri Sen. Jim Talent, was defeated by Democratic State
Auditor Claire McCaskill, who campaigned hard in favor of embryonic
stem-cell research (which passed); Congressman Richard Pombo (R-CA), an
anti-environmentalist closely tied to former House Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX)
and scandalized Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff, was defeated in his
majority Republican Central Valley; Congressman J.D,. Hayworth, one of the
loudest anti-immigrant voices in Congress, lost his seat in Arizona; Amway's
Dick DeVos, who helped found the ultra-right and secretive Council for
National Policy, lost his GOP-backed bid to become Governor of Michigan; and
in Ohio, Republican Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a strong ally of
the state's Patriot Pastors -- and who many blamed for the electoral
shenanigans that cost Senator John Kerry the presidential election in
2004 -- lost his bid to become governor.

A post-election press release from Americans United for Separation of Church
and State looked at a few other races where Christian conservatives fared
poorly:

. Kansas: Controversial Attorney General Phill Kline, who attempted to build
a church-based political machine and vowed to imprison doctors who provide
abortions, lost his reelection bid to Democrat Paul Morrison, 42 percent to
58 percent. Kline had appeared at the Family Research Council's "Values
Voter Summit" in September, where he promised to press a Religious Right
agenda if returned to office.

. Maryland: Republican Senate candidate Michael Steele, an opponent of legal
abortion and stem-cell research, was defeated by Benjamin Cardin, 54 percent
to 44 percent.

. Florida: In the race for U.S. Senate, U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris (R), who
based much of her candidacy on Religious Right appeals, lost badly to
incumbent Senator Bill Nelson, 60 percent to 38 percent.

. Oklahoma: U.S. Rep. Ernest "Jim" Istook (R), a frequent backer of a
constitutional amendment designed to weaken the separation of church and
state, lost the governor's race.

. Indiana: U.S. Rep. John Hostettler, a frequent speaker at Religious Right
gatherings and sponsor of a bill designed to make it harder for people to
bring church-state cases into federal courts, was trounced by Democrat Brad
Ellsworth, 61 percent to 39 percent.

. Kentucky: Anne Northup, a Republican who successfully used the promise of
public grants through the "faith-based" initiative to woo religious voters
in 2002 and 2004, lost to Democrat John Yarmuth, 51 percent to 48 percent.

. Conservative social agenda (except anti-gay initiatives) takes a bit hit

In addition to the passage of Missouri's stem cell research initiative, the
anti-abortion movement lost in South Dakota, where a provision to impose a
near-total ban on abortions failed 56 percent to 44 percent. According to
Americans United, "National Religious Right groups had poured into the
state, hoping to create a tide that would carry the initiative to other
states."

Judie Brown, of American Life League (ALL), told Agape Press, a
Christian-based news service, that ALL was very disappointed that many South
Dakota citizens made the "tragic decision" to vote down the Women's Health
and Human Protection Act. She said religious right supporters worked hard to
"combat the manipulative propaganda" from abortion proponents nationwide,
but pro-lifers' efforts fell short of the goal as Planned Parenthood and
other abortion supporters did all in their power to eradicate the South
Dakota abortion law.

"The proponents of death poured millions of dollars into the state," Brown
noted. They "decried the pro-life law as being callous toward women and did
all they could to convince the electorate that abortion is a good rather
than an evil."

And in California, Proposition 85, a parental notification initiative which
would have changed the state constitution to impose government-mandated
parental notification for young women seeking abortion care, even if it
jeopardized their safety -- similar to one that failed in 2004 -- went down
to defeat.

Michigan voters outlawed affirmative action in public education, employment
and state contracts. Fifty-eight percent of Michigan voters approved
Proposition 2, even though it was opposed by many prominent leaders in the
political, business, and academic worlds -- including both the re-elected
Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm and Dick DeVos, her Republican
opponent.

The proposition was orchestrated by Ward Connerly, the head of the
conservative philanthropy-supported organization the American Civil Rights
Institute, who pushed through a similar ban on affirmative action in
California during the 1996 election. According to the Feminist Daily News
Wire, Connerly "created an anti-affirmative action organization with the
same name as the bill on Michigan 's ballot -- 'the Michigan Civil Rights
Initiative' -- with Jennifer Gratz. Gratz had filed suit against the
University of Michigan Law School in 2003 when she was reportedly denied
admission."

Election Day was also a good day for the anti-gay, anti-same-sex marriage
amendment crowd. Voters approved so-called "defense of marriage" amendments
in Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Meanwhile, Arizona became the first of more than two dozen states that have
considered such measures to defeat a state constitutional amendment banning
gay marriage.

Texans' big money goes to waste

Megamillionaires James Leininger, the right-wing's top funder of school
vouchers in Texas, and Bob Perry, the Houston home-builder who was the major
financial backer of the Swiftboaters assault on Sen. John Kerry's military
record in the 2004 presidential election, spent more than $10 million during
this year's election cycle. While Leininger was content to spend his dough
mostly in state, the vast majority of Perry's money was channeled to a
number of GOP congressional candidates through several Perry-supported front
groups.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Leininger's candidates generally fared
poorly and Perry's money was practically tossed down a gopher hole.

Leininger "invested more than $2.7 million in 10 of this year's races for
the Legislature, giving more than $400,000 each to four candidates, in some
cases providing more than 90 percent of their financial support... [and]
eight of those 10 candidates lost, several to candidates who received active
support from teachers and other anti-voucher groups," the newspaper
reported.

"I think you could say Leininger was the biggest loser in these elections,"
Andrew Wheat of Texans for Public Justice, an Austin nonprofit that tracks
political contributions, told the Houston Chronicle.

Perry, who gave $5 million to the Economic Freedom Fund and $4 million to
two other groups, wound up supporting few victorious candidates. In addition
to funding a Sopranos-like attack ad against New Jersey Democratic Senator
Bob Menendez, Perry's money went toward "robo calls, mailers, and TV and
radio ads attacking 20 Democratic House and Senate candidates. Highlights
included Montana 's gay-baiting TV ad 'Brokebank Democrats' and his impish
habit of putting the home phone numbers of Democratic challengers in his
ads," TPMmuckraker.com's Justin Rood reported the day after the election.

According to Rood, "In 14 of the 20 races, [Perry's] GOP candidate lost.
Four of his candidates won; they're still puzzling over the ballots in two."

The religious left

The whys, wherefores and participants in the election are not only being
debated on the right. "Evangelicals working to bolster the Democratic Party
exulted in the resounding victory [and] moved quickly to claim credit for
the strong Democratic showing nationwide," Sheryl Henderson Blunt wrote in a
ChristianityToday.com analysis titled "Declaring Victory: Evangelical
Democrats claim credit, leading conservatives find plenty to blame."

"The Religious Right's dominance over politics and evangelicals has come to
an end," said Jim Wallis, leader of the Sojourners/Call to Renewal movement
and an adviser to Democrats. "I would say the Religious Right has lost, and
the Secular Left has lost."

According to Blunt, Wallis' "organization distributed more than 300,000
'Voting God's Politics Issues Guides' in an effort to thwart religious
conservatives and prompt voters to think more broadly about what he believes
a biblical political agenda entails.

"The Democratic leadership needs to recognize how the winds are changing,"
Wallis told Christianity Today. "I really think there is a third force. Not
a third party but a broader, deeper agenda that reflects a more biblical
political agenda. [Focus on the Family founder James] Dobson can't be happy
this morning, but neither can the Secular Left.

"The candidates who won are genuinely either people of faith or friendly to
faith. A lot of them are pro-life, and pro-poor," he said. "The religious
faith communities were deeply involved in increasing the minimum wage, and
people are saying that fair wages are a biblical issue."

The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation
of Church and State had a different view. "The Religious Right threw
everything it had into this election and still came up short," Lynn said in
a statement released early Wednesday. "Its campaign to politicize churches
and demonize its opponents has failed."

American United's Lynn, author of the new book "Piety & Politics: The
Right-Wing Assault On Religious Freedom," said that "Despite unprecedented
efforts to mobilize churches with questionable tactics, the Religious Right
failed yesterday to elect many of its favorite candidates. But I've followed
this well-funded movement long enough to know that its leaders won't go away
quietly. We can expect them to be angrier than ever in the upcoming months."

Rallying the troops

Despite the early conciliatory statements coming from both President Bush
and Speaker-to-be Pelosi, failed presidential candidate Gary Bauer, who is
president of American Values, told Agape Press that he expects an "emotional
and vitriolic" debate to ensue when Democrats take control of Congress.

He pointed out that the liberal committee chairmen in the House --
Congressman Charles Rangel and others, for instance -- "have already
promised that there will be subpoenas and White House officials will be
dragged up to Capitol Hill to be run over the coals, et cetera."

"I think our politics, while it might be hard to believe, are going to get
even nastier over these next two years." And, he warned, Americans should be
prepared for a strong liberal agenda in the House.

"You just can't get around the fact that the National Democratic Party is
vehemently committed to abortion on demand and is in alignment with all of
the demands of the radical gay rights movement," Bauer maintained. "So, even
as some of the people being elected are conservative Democrats, when they
get here, they will be required -- they'll be forced -- to go along with
leaders like Nancy Pelosi."

The overriding messages from election 2006 is that it was an emphatic
rejection of the Bush Administration's policy in Iraq, a clear rebuke to
those involved in Abramoff Affair and other culture of corruption and sex
scandals, a reflection of the voter's disenchantment with one-party rule,
and a recognition that culture war issues -- same-sex marriage and
abortion -- in and of themselves do not have the same clout as they have had
in past elections.
_______

--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson