"SHOOTER586" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168669780.845938.288360@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

I have no hard proof. If I did, I would not be publicly speaking out and
calling for an investigation. I would be living a very low profile life,
probably in another country, and secretly writing a book.

"SHOOTER586" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168209306.687458.29770@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Yeah, REAL Zionists don't do ANYTHING for free... :Oo

Incredible Bikini Sexy Romp http://bikini.sexyhosting.info/ Wilder than girls gone wild.

Dirk was on the West Coast when he got the call. An old
friend at the Toronto police department thought he would like
to fly up and take a look at a homicide which had occurred
the previous evening. He decided to skip the last day at the
World Holistics conference and take the next plane out of
San Francisco.

The flight was bad; Dirk had been hit on the back of the head
by the Newspaper trolley, the drinks trolley, the dinner trolley
and now the gift trolley. When the hostesses weren

I keep seeing his paste as if he is done with his "investigation". So,
to clean up a large portion of it with his quotes from firefighters
claiming to have heard explosions, I have a paragraph that would debunk
it.

It is from the "Journal of Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories" So it is
actually peeer-reviewed. Hence the word 'Journal'.

Failure to call for an investigation:

The argument from silence If a majority of the 503 firefighters on the
scene that day heard what they felt were explosives, why haven't they
been calling for an investigation? These are NYC firefighters...

Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group

In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
bugs. They found nothing.

I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video, surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be using.

I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping" devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
believe our neighbours would permit this.

We paid Nationwide