On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:52:13 -0800, "Gandalf Grey"
infectedmail.com> wrote:

"hurt, nickle-less" bellsouth.net> sniveled like a 'tard:

Typical right-wing knee-jerk response..

--Like I said, complexity jut isn't in your range of abilities..

Kurt Lochner wrote:

Kurt! WB?
:-\

Click@Knicklas.com wrote:

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Whatta fucking moron you are, Roselles...
__________________________________________________________________________

Irrefutable proof that Roselles made up his entire, insipid "crank
call" fantasy:

The President Wants a War with Bigger Tits

By Steve Young
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:44am

While Fox New and the far-right Lords of Loud took aim at the important news
at the Senate Hearings - namely Barbara Boxer telling Condaleezza Rice that
either of them might not suffer through the war that someone with a kid over
there would - they completely ignored what Rice suggested that President
Bush really had in mind.

Sending additional troops into Iraq is not intended as a escalation. Rather
she would call it "an augmentation."

Augmentation. Now that made a hell of a lot more sense than sending more
soldiers into a growing quagmire. And it's also something most guys would
buy and women will understand. Not like, but have experiential familiarity
with.

New Lies Forward

By Stephen Pizzo
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:42am

Well it's a new year, and you know what that means; time to update the
administration's list of stated reasons for it's war in Iraq -- why we are
there, why we are/must "win," and why the loss of American lives there is a
"price worth paying."

Whew! Just typing the above sentence exhausted me. I'm so tired from
three-plus years of struggling with this administration's full frontal
assault on our collective intelligence. Tired of trying to untangle their
torqued logic, fractured facts and their Orwellian-ization of our language,
our traditions, our laws, our Constitution.

But I must - we all must. Because that beast, now boxed into a canyon of
it's own making, is more dangerous today than ever before. Though evermore
transparent, their lies have become even bolder. And, even with years of
disproved and discarded lies in their wake, far too many Americans - and
even the media, seem prepared to once again give them the benefit of the
doubt - when doubt itself should by now be the order of the day.

Barack, We Hardly Know Ye: A Question For Sen. Obama

By RJ Eskow
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:31am

It's Candidacy as Celebrity, as reported by our "American Idol" political
press. The resemblance to another Presidential candidate is striking: The
good looks, the swooning crowds, the swooning reporters, and the eloquence
all bring to mind another charismatic Democrat. Unfortunately it's not John
or Bobby Kennedy.

It's Jerry Brown.

When Brown ran in for President he drew the same screaming fans and the same
enthusiastic coverage. He was a late entrant in 1976 but was given more of a
real chance in 1980. Still, but at some point his campaign failed to
coalesce on the ground. Voters weren't able to get a grasp of who this
enigmatic candidate was, or what he stood for.

Is Jerry Brown's experience a cautionary tale for Barack Obama? It's too
early to tell, and of course there are significant differences between these
two intelligent and compelling politicians. But, like Obama, Brown had a
knack for defying left-right differences. He replaced ideology with enigma
and liberalism with language. In the end, it didn't work.

Spocko, Glenn Beck, and ABC

By Eric Boehlert
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:25am

President George W. Bush's popularity has fallen to new lows, Democrats have
been swept into office, and a strong majority of Americans now opposes the
war in Iraq, but ABC has decided the time is right to beef up with more
conservative pundits on staff and to strike out against a liberal online
critic who raised questions about the network's policy of broadcasting hate
radio.

Last week spotlighted ABC and its unfortunate trend toward irresponsibility,
as the broadcasting giant hired Glenn Beck -- a high-profile war cheerleader
[0] known for grade-school level name-calling of Democrats -- to comment on
the day's events for Good Morning America. ABC last week was also dealing
with the messy fallout from its wrongheaded decision to fire off a
cease-and-desist letter to a little-known blogger named Spocko who had been
posting audio clips from KSFO in San Francisco, an ABC-owned talk station
where hosts have advocated violence against, progressives, Muslims, and
Democratic members of Congress.

Death Watch in the Persian Gulf and Washington

By Dave Lindorff
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:19am

Watching the slow-motion march to war against Iran is a bit like watching a
terminal cancer patient in a hospice. We know how it's going to end. We know
it's going to be tragic and ugly. But we are powerless to stop it.

There is a difference of course.

For the cancer patient, there really is no alternative.

For us, there is an alternative to the catastrophe which President Bush and
his regent, Dick Cheney, are preparing for us all.

We could rise up as a nation and demand that our elected representatives
pass a Boland-type amendment banning any use of the military in Iraq. We
could demand that a resolution be passed revoking the 2002 Authorization for
Use of Military Force against Iraq. We could demand the revocation of the
2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force which the president has
improperly cited as giving him extra-Constitutional powers. And we could
demand that Congress tell the president and vice president that if they
attack Iran without explicit congressional authorization they will both be
immediately impeached.

Chuck Hagel for President!

By Robert Scheer
Created Jan 17 2007 - 9:06am

- from Truthdig (posted with permission) [1]

Chuck Hagel for president! If it ever narrows down to a choice between him
and some Democratic hack who hasn't the guts to fundamentally challenge the
president on Iraq, then the conservative Republican from Nebraska will have
my vote. Yes, the war is that important, and the fact that Sen. Hillary
Clinton of New York, the leading Democratic candidate, still can't or won't
take a clear stand on the occupation is insulting to the vast majority of
voters who have.

Sen. Hagel is a decorated Vietnam War vet who learned the crucial lessons of
that Democrat-launched debacle of post-colonial imperialism. Even more
important, he has the courage to challenge a president from his own party
who so clearly didn't.

"The speech given last night [Jan. 10] by this president represents the most
dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam," Hagel said.
"We are projecting ourselves further and deeper into a situation that we
cannot win militarily.