On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:46:27 -0400, strabo
flashlight.net>
wrote:
>David Johnston wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 03:56:36 -0400, strabo
flashlight.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>> David Johnston wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 23:28:55 -0700, Tim May
>>>>
removethis.got.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If the United States had not refused the Jews after WW II, they would
>>>>>> all be here in America. Palestine was a bad choice, in 1946, for the
>>>>>> world's wandering Jews. They should have gone to Madagascar where the
>>>>>> Germans wanted them to go even before the Holocaust.
>>>>> It was not a legitimate function of the U.S. government to let in many
>>>>> milliions of Jews or any other kind of refugees.
>>>>>
>>>> My goodness what a brain-damaged statement. So whose job is it to let
>>>> in millions of refugees?
>>>>
>>> No one has such authority in the US.
>>
>> Oh really? What denies them that authority? .
>>> Yes, the current invasion of illegal aliens is unconstitutional
>>> and is destroying the US as we knew it.
>>
>> Please cite the constitutional measure forbidding it.
>>
>
>Apparently you attended government schools and/or you are a lawyer.
>FYI, the US constitution is a negative document. If it ain't in there
>it ain't lawful. The constitution describes the responsibilities of
>government and authorizes lawful action. Mass immigration is not
>authorized.
Isn't it? So you're saying that the United States, a nation which
accepted a flow of immigration all though it's existence was violating
the Constitution throughout it's entire history?
